Cargando…

Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptoms of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CeD) often overlap, and studies suggest a link between SIBO and CeD. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare SIBO prevalence in CeD patients and controls and assessed effects o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shah, Ayesha, Thite, Parag, Hansen, Teressa, Kendall, Bradley J, Sanders, David S, Morrison, Mark, Jones, Michael P, Holtmann, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15920
_version_ 1784860377801031680
author Shah, Ayesha
Thite, Parag
Hansen, Teressa
Kendall, Bradley J
Sanders, David S
Morrison, Mark
Jones, Michael P
Holtmann, Gerald
author_facet Shah, Ayesha
Thite, Parag
Hansen, Teressa
Kendall, Bradley J
Sanders, David S
Morrison, Mark
Jones, Michael P
Holtmann, Gerald
author_sort Shah, Ayesha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptoms of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CeD) often overlap, and studies suggest a link between SIBO and CeD. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare SIBO prevalence in CeD patients and controls and assessed effects of antimicrobial therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms in SIBO positive CeD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched until February 2022 for studies reporting SIBO prevalence in CeD. Prevalence rates, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SIBO in CeD and controls were calculated. RESULTS: We included 14 studies, with 742 CeD patients and 178 controls. The pooled prevalence of SIBO in CeD was 18.3% (95% CI: 11.4–28.1), with substantial heterogeneity. Including case–control studies with healthy controls, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was significantly increased (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 2.1–12.4, P = 0.0001), with minimal heterogeneity. Utilizing breath tests, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was 20.8% (95% CI: 11.9–33.7), almost two‐fold higher compared with culture‐based methods at 12.6% (95% CI: 5.1–28.0), with substantial heterogeneity in both analyses. SIBO prevalence in CeD patients nonresponsive to a gluten free diet (GFD) was not statistically higher as compared with those responsive to GFD (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.4–5.0, P = 0.511). Antibiotic therapy of SIBO positive CeD patients resulted in improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms in 95.6% (95% CI: 78.0–99.9) and normalization of breath tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a link between SIBO and CeD. While SIBO could explain nonresponse to a GFD in CeD, SIBO prevalence is not statistically higher in CeD patients non‐responsive to GFD. The overall quality of the evidence is low, mainly due to substantial “clinical heterogeneity” and the limited sensitivity/specificity of the available diagnostic tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97959792022-12-28 Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Shah, Ayesha Thite, Parag Hansen, Teressa Kendall, Bradley J Sanders, David S Morrison, Mark Jones, Michael P Holtmann, Gerald J Gastroenterol Hepatol Meta‐Analysis BACKGROUND AND AIM: Symptoms of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and celiac disease (CeD) often overlap, and studies suggest a link between SIBO and CeD. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis to compare SIBO prevalence in CeD patients and controls and assessed effects of antimicrobial therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms in SIBO positive CeD patients. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched until February 2022 for studies reporting SIBO prevalence in CeD. Prevalence rates, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of SIBO in CeD and controls were calculated. RESULTS: We included 14 studies, with 742 CeD patients and 178 controls. The pooled prevalence of SIBO in CeD was 18.3% (95% CI: 11.4–28.1), with substantial heterogeneity. Including case–control studies with healthy controls, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was significantly increased (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 2.1–12.4, P = 0.0001), with minimal heterogeneity. Utilizing breath tests, SIBO prevalence in CeD patients was 20.8% (95% CI: 11.9–33.7), almost two‐fold higher compared with culture‐based methods at 12.6% (95% CI: 5.1–28.0), with substantial heterogeneity in both analyses. SIBO prevalence in CeD patients nonresponsive to a gluten free diet (GFD) was not statistically higher as compared with those responsive to GFD (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 0.4–5.0, P = 0.511). Antibiotic therapy of SIBO positive CeD patients resulted in improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms in 95.6% (95% CI: 78.0–99.9) and normalization of breath tests. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a link between SIBO and CeD. While SIBO could explain nonresponse to a GFD in CeD, SIBO prevalence is not statistically higher in CeD patients non‐responsive to GFD. The overall quality of the evidence is low, mainly due to substantial “clinical heterogeneity” and the limited sensitivity/specificity of the available diagnostic tests. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-01 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9795979/ /pubmed/35734803 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15920 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Meta‐Analysis
Shah, Ayesha
Thite, Parag
Hansen, Teressa
Kendall, Bradley J
Sanders, David S
Morrison, Mark
Jones, Michael P
Holtmann, Gerald
Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort links between celiac disease and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Meta‐Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734803
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15920
work_keys_str_mv AT shahayesha linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT thiteparag linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hansenteressa linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kendallbradleyj linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sandersdavids linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT morrisonmark linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jonesmichaelp linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT holtmanngerald linksbetweenceliacdiseaseandsmallintestinalbacterialovergrowthasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis