Cargando…

Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C

We explore needle sugar isotopic compositions (δ(18)O and δ(13)C) in boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) over two growing seasons. A leaf‐level dynamic model driven by environmental conditions and based on current understanding of isotope fractionation processes was built to predict δ(18)O and δ(13...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leppä, Kersti, Tang, Yu, Ogée, Jérôme, Launiainen, Samuli, Kahmen, Ansgar, Kolari, Pasi, Sahlstedt, Elina, Saurer, Matthias, Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina, Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18227
Descripción
Sumario:We explore needle sugar isotopic compositions (δ(18)O and δ(13)C) in boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) over two growing seasons. A leaf‐level dynamic model driven by environmental conditions and based on current understanding of isotope fractionation processes was built to predict δ(18)O and δ(13)C of two hierarchical needle carbohydrate pools, accounting for the needle sugar pool size and the presence of an invariant pinitol pool. Model results agreed well with observed needle water δ(18)O, δ(18)O and δ(13)C of needle water‐soluble carbohydrates (sugars + pinitol), and needle sugar δ(13)C (R (2) = 0.95, 0.84, 0.60, 0.73, respectively). Relative humidity (RH) and intercellular to ambient CO(2) concentration ratio (C (i)/C (a)) were the dominant drivers of δ(18)O and δ(13)C variability, respectively. However, the variability of needle sugar δ(18)O and δ(13)C was reduced on diel and intra‐seasonal timescales, compared to predictions based on instantaneous RH and C (i)/C (a), due to the large needle sugar pool, which caused the signal formation period to vary seasonally from 2 d to more than 5 d. Furthermore, accounting for a temperature‐sensitive biochemical (18)O‐fractionation factor and mesophyll resistance in (13)C‐discrimination were critical. Interpreting leaf‐level isotopic signals requires understanding on time integration caused by mixing in the needle sugar pool.