Cargando…

Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C

We explore needle sugar isotopic compositions (δ(18)O and δ(13)C) in boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) over two growing seasons. A leaf‐level dynamic model driven by environmental conditions and based on current understanding of isotope fractionation processes was built to predict δ(18)O and δ(13...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leppä, Kersti, Tang, Yu, Ogée, Jérôme, Launiainen, Samuli, Kahmen, Ansgar, Kolari, Pasi, Sahlstedt, Elina, Saurer, Matthias, Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina, Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18227
_version_ 1784860382177787904
author Leppä, Kersti
Tang, Yu
Ogée, Jérôme
Launiainen, Samuli
Kahmen, Ansgar
Kolari, Pasi
Sahlstedt, Elina
Saurer, Matthias
Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina
Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T.
author_facet Leppä, Kersti
Tang, Yu
Ogée, Jérôme
Launiainen, Samuli
Kahmen, Ansgar
Kolari, Pasi
Sahlstedt, Elina
Saurer, Matthias
Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina
Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T.
author_sort Leppä, Kersti
collection PubMed
description We explore needle sugar isotopic compositions (δ(18)O and δ(13)C) in boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) over two growing seasons. A leaf‐level dynamic model driven by environmental conditions and based on current understanding of isotope fractionation processes was built to predict δ(18)O and δ(13)C of two hierarchical needle carbohydrate pools, accounting for the needle sugar pool size and the presence of an invariant pinitol pool. Model results agreed well with observed needle water δ(18)O, δ(18)O and δ(13)C of needle water‐soluble carbohydrates (sugars + pinitol), and needle sugar δ(13)C (R (2) = 0.95, 0.84, 0.60, 0.73, respectively). Relative humidity (RH) and intercellular to ambient CO(2) concentration ratio (C (i)/C (a)) were the dominant drivers of δ(18)O and δ(13)C variability, respectively. However, the variability of needle sugar δ(18)O and δ(13)C was reduced on diel and intra‐seasonal timescales, compared to predictions based on instantaneous RH and C (i)/C (a), due to the large needle sugar pool, which caused the signal formation period to vary seasonally from 2 d to more than 5 d. Furthermore, accounting for a temperature‐sensitive biochemical (18)O‐fractionation factor and mesophyll resistance in (13)C‐discrimination were critical. Interpreting leaf‐level isotopic signals requires understanding on time integration caused by mixing in the needle sugar pool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9795997
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97959972022-12-28 Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C Leppä, Kersti Tang, Yu Ogée, Jérôme Launiainen, Samuli Kahmen, Ansgar Kolari, Pasi Sahlstedt, Elina Saurer, Matthias Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T. New Phytol Research We explore needle sugar isotopic compositions (δ(18)O and δ(13)C) in boreal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) over two growing seasons. A leaf‐level dynamic model driven by environmental conditions and based on current understanding of isotope fractionation processes was built to predict δ(18)O and δ(13)C of two hierarchical needle carbohydrate pools, accounting for the needle sugar pool size and the presence of an invariant pinitol pool. Model results agreed well with observed needle water δ(18)O, δ(18)O and δ(13)C of needle water‐soluble carbohydrates (sugars + pinitol), and needle sugar δ(13)C (R (2) = 0.95, 0.84, 0.60, 0.73, respectively). Relative humidity (RH) and intercellular to ambient CO(2) concentration ratio (C (i)/C (a)) were the dominant drivers of δ(18)O and δ(13)C variability, respectively. However, the variability of needle sugar δ(18)O and δ(13)C was reduced on diel and intra‐seasonal timescales, compared to predictions based on instantaneous RH and C (i)/C (a), due to the large needle sugar pool, which caused the signal formation period to vary seasonally from 2 d to more than 5 d. Furthermore, accounting for a temperature‐sensitive biochemical (18)O‐fractionation factor and mesophyll resistance in (13)C‐discrimination were critical. Interpreting leaf‐level isotopic signals requires understanding on time integration caused by mixing in the needle sugar pool. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-24 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9795997/ /pubmed/35575976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18227 Text en © 2022 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2022 New Phytologist Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Leppä, Kersti
Tang, Yu
Ogée, Jérôme
Launiainen, Samuli
Kahmen, Ansgar
Kolari, Pasi
Sahlstedt, Elina
Saurer, Matthias
Schiestl‐Aalto, Pauliina
Rinne‐Garmston, Katja T.
Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title_full Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title_fullStr Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title_full_unstemmed Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title_short Explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)O and δ(13)C
title_sort explicitly accounting for needle sugar pool size crucial for predicting intra‐seasonal dynamics of needle carbohydrates δ(18)o and δ(13)c
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9795997/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35575976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.18227
work_keys_str_mv AT leppakersti explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT tangyu explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT ogeejerome explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT launiainensamuli explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT kahmenansgar explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT kolaripasi explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT sahlstedtelina explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT saurermatthias explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT schiestlaaltopauliina explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c
AT rinnegarmstonkatjat explicitlyaccountingforneedlesugarpoolsizecrucialforpredictingintraseasonaldynamicsofneedlecarbohydratesd18oandd13c