Cargando…
Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies
Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are biting nuisances and arbovirus vectors of both public health and veterinary significance in Trinidad. We compared sampling methods to define the behaviour and bionomics of adult Culicoides populations at a commercial dairy goat farm. Three stat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mve.12590 |
_version_ | 1784860397719781376 |
---|---|
author | Brown‐Joseph, Tamiko Oura, Christopher A. L. Carrington, Christine V. F. Harrup, Lara E. |
author_facet | Brown‐Joseph, Tamiko Oura, Christopher A. L. Carrington, Christine V. F. Harrup, Lara E. |
author_sort | Brown‐Joseph, Tamiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are biting nuisances and arbovirus vectors of both public health and veterinary significance in Trinidad. We compared sampling methods to define the behaviour and bionomics of adult Culicoides populations at a commercial dairy goat farm. Three static trap designs were compared: (a) Centre for Disease Control (CDC) downdraft UV trap; (b) CDC trap with an incandescent bulb and (c) CDC trap with semiochemical lure consisting of R‐(−)‐1‐octen‐3‐ol and CO(2) (no bulb). Sweep netting was used to define diel periodicity. A total of 30,701 biting midges were collected using static traps, dominated by female Culicoides furens (>70% of trap collections across all three designs). There was no significant difference in the Margalef's index between the three traps; however, trap designs A and C collected a significantly greater number of individuals than trap B, and trap C gained highest species richness. The greatest species richness and abundance of Culicoides collected by sweep net was observed between 6:00 and 6:15 pm and notable differences in the crepuscular activity pattern of several species were identified. Comparative data on Culicoides species richness, abundance, sex and reproductive status is discussed and can be used to improve surveillance strategies, research designs and risk management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97960622022-12-28 Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies Brown‐Joseph, Tamiko Oura, Christopher A. L. Carrington, Christine V. F. Harrup, Lara E. Med Vet Entomol Original Articles Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are biting nuisances and arbovirus vectors of both public health and veterinary significance in Trinidad. We compared sampling methods to define the behaviour and bionomics of adult Culicoides populations at a commercial dairy goat farm. Three static trap designs were compared: (a) Centre for Disease Control (CDC) downdraft UV trap; (b) CDC trap with an incandescent bulb and (c) CDC trap with semiochemical lure consisting of R‐(−)‐1‐octen‐3‐ol and CO(2) (no bulb). Sweep netting was used to define diel periodicity. A total of 30,701 biting midges were collected using static traps, dominated by female Culicoides furens (>70% of trap collections across all three designs). There was no significant difference in the Margalef's index between the three traps; however, trap designs A and C collected a significantly greater number of individuals than trap B, and trap C gained highest species richness. The greatest species richness and abundance of Culicoides collected by sweep net was observed between 6:00 and 6:15 pm and notable differences in the crepuscular activity pattern of several species were identified. Comparative data on Culicoides species richness, abundance, sex and reproductive status is discussed and can be used to improve surveillance strategies, research designs and risk management. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2022-06-15 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9796062/ /pubmed/35703533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mve.12590 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Medical and Veterinary Entomology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Entomological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Brown‐Joseph, Tamiko Oura, Christopher A. L. Carrington, Christine V. F. Harrup, Lara E. Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title | Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title_full | Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title_fullStr | Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title_short | Comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor Culicoides biting midge activity in Trinidad, West Indies |
title_sort | comparison of surveillance trapping methods to monitor culicoides biting midge activity in trinidad, west indies |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35703533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mve.12590 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brownjosephtamiko comparisonofsurveillancetrappingmethodstomonitorculicoidesbitingmidgeactivityintrinidadwestindies AT ourachristopheral comparisonofsurveillancetrappingmethodstomonitorculicoidesbitingmidgeactivityintrinidadwestindies AT carringtonchristinevf comparisonofsurveillancetrappingmethodstomonitorculicoidesbitingmidgeactivityintrinidadwestindies AT harruplarae comparisonofsurveillancetrappingmethodstomonitorculicoidesbitingmidgeactivityintrinidadwestindies |