Cargando…
Trauma‐focused guided self‐help interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Trauma‐focused guided self‐help (TF‐GSH) is an important alternative to psychological therapy delivered by a therapist. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy of TF‐GSH in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms. A total of 17 trials we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796235/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35621368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/da.23272 |
Sumario: | Trauma‐focused guided self‐help (TF‐GSH) is an important alternative to psychological therapy delivered by a therapist. This meta‐analysis evaluates the efficacy of TF‐GSH in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms. A total of 17 trials were included that compared a TF‐GSH intervention (N = 610) to various control comparators (N = 570). Control conditions included treatment as usual (k = 2), waiting list (k = 11), phone monitoring (k = 1), nontrauma writing (k = 1), general support (k = 1), and supportive counseling (k = 1). A moderate‐ to large‐sized effect favouring TF‐GSH was observed for PTSD (k = 17, g = −0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −1.24, −0.39) and a moderate‐sized effect was observed for depressive (k = 13, g = −0.73, 95% CI: −1.16, −0.31) and anxiety (k = 11, g = −0.72, 95% CI: −1.18, −0.27) symptoms, with considerable heterogeneity. Moderator analyses were all not statistically significant. Results indicate that TF‐GSH is a promising treatment for PTSD and comorbid depressive and anxiety symptoms. We discuss the nature, extent, and quality of the literature to provide a point of departure for future research. TF‐GSH (and unguided self‐help) may not be appropriate for certain individuals at certain times. Exploring a broad range of treatment delivery modalities will move the field closer towards a model of evidence‐based care in which the likely appropriate dose and type of intervention can be matched to individuals based on presenting problems and other variables. |
---|