Cargando…
Assessment of key characteristics, methodology, and effect size measures used in meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies
Since the early 1990s the number of systematic reviews (SR) of animal studies has steadily increased. There is, however, little guidance on when and how to conduct a meta‐analysis of human‐health‐related animal studies. To gain insight about the methods that are currently used we created an overview...
Autores principales: | Hooijmans, Carlijn R., Donders, Rogier, Magnuson, Kristen, Wever, Kimberley E., Ergün, Mehmet, Rooney, Andrew A., Walker, Vickie, Langendam, Miranda W. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1578 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Renal Perfusion and Function during Pneumoperitoneum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies
por: Wever, Kimberley E., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
The effect of analgesics on stimulus evoked pain-like behaviour in animal models for chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy- a meta-analysis
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies
por: Hooijmans, Carlijn R, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
A Systematic Review on Transplantation Studies of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Animal Models
por: Koster, Céline, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Determinants of the Efficacy of Cardiac Ischemic Preconditioning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies
por: Wever, Kimberley E., et al.
Publicado: (2015)