Cargando…

Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple studies have examined barriers and facilitators to help‐seeking, but the prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling (PG) is not well established. We aimed to estimate the international prevalence of help‐seeking for PG among the general population and among subgrou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bijker, Rimke, Booth, Natalia, Merkouris, Stephanie S., Dowling, Nicki A., Rodda, Simone N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35830876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15952
_version_ 1784860475711815680
author Bijker, Rimke
Booth, Natalia
Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Dowling, Nicki A.
Rodda, Simone N.
author_facet Bijker, Rimke
Booth, Natalia
Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Dowling, Nicki A.
Rodda, Simone N.
author_sort Bijker, Rimke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple studies have examined barriers and facilitators to help‐seeking, but the prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling (PG) is not well established. We aimed to estimate the international prevalence of help‐seeking for PG among the general population and among subgroups of people at risk for PG (i.e. low‐risk, moderate‐risk and PG). METHODS: Systematic search of grey literature (through gambling repositories, gambling research institutes and Google) and peer‐reviewed literature (through ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus) for gambling prevalence studies that reported on help‐seeking for PG. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses. Studies used representative sampling methods to determine the prevalence of gambling participation and data collection 2010 onward. Twenty‐four studies met the inclusion criteria. The main outcome was population prevalence of help‐seeking for PG. Help‐seeking was defined as any intentional action to change gambling behaviours, including professional services (inclusive of in‐person or distance help), non‐professional help (e.g. from family and friends) and self‐help. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explain variability in help‐seeking prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Measurement of help‐seeking was inconsistent across included studies and, overall, there was high risk of bias. We estimated a general population help‐seeking prevalence for PG of 0.23% (95% CI, 0.16–0.33). Prevalence estimates were significantly higher in studies assessing lifetime (0.50%; 95% CI, 0.35–0.71) compared with current help‐seeking (0.14%; 95% CI, 0.10–0.20, P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of difference in prevalence estimates by gambling participation, region, type of help‐seeking, or year of data collection. Compared with people with low‐risk gambling (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.07%–1.04%), prevalence estimates were significantly higher in those with moderate‐risk (3.73%; 95% CI, 2.07%–6.63%) and problem gambling (20.63%; 95% CI, 12.89%–31.35%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One in 25 moderate‐risk gamblers and 1 in 5 people with problem gambling have sought help for problems related to their gambling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796401
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97964012022-12-30 Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Bijker, Rimke Booth, Natalia Merkouris, Stephanie S. Dowling, Nicki A. Rodda, Simone N. Addiction Reviews BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Multiple studies have examined barriers and facilitators to help‐seeking, but the prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling (PG) is not well established. We aimed to estimate the international prevalence of help‐seeking for PG among the general population and among subgroups of people at risk for PG (i.e. low‐risk, moderate‐risk and PG). METHODS: Systematic search of grey literature (through gambling repositories, gambling research institutes and Google) and peer‐reviewed literature (through ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus) for gambling prevalence studies that reported on help‐seeking for PG. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses. Studies used representative sampling methods to determine the prevalence of gambling participation and data collection 2010 onward. Twenty‐four studies met the inclusion criteria. The main outcome was population prevalence of help‐seeking for PG. Help‐seeking was defined as any intentional action to change gambling behaviours, including professional services (inclusive of in‐person or distance help), non‐professional help (e.g. from family and friends) and self‐help. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explain variability in help‐seeking prevalence estimates. RESULTS: Measurement of help‐seeking was inconsistent across included studies and, overall, there was high risk of bias. We estimated a general population help‐seeking prevalence for PG of 0.23% (95% CI, 0.16–0.33). Prevalence estimates were significantly higher in studies assessing lifetime (0.50%; 95% CI, 0.35–0.71) compared with current help‐seeking (0.14%; 95% CI, 0.10–0.20, P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of difference in prevalence estimates by gambling participation, region, type of help‐seeking, or year of data collection. Compared with people with low‐risk gambling (0.27%; 95% CI, 0.07%–1.04%), prevalence estimates were significantly higher in those with moderate‐risk (3.73%; 95% CI, 2.07%–6.63%) and problem gambling (20.63%; 95% CI, 12.89%–31.35%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One in 25 moderate‐risk gamblers and 1 in 5 people with problem gambling have sought help for problems related to their gambling. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-13 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9796401/ /pubmed/35830876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15952 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Reviews
Bijker, Rimke
Booth, Natalia
Merkouris, Stephanie S.
Dowling, Nicki A.
Rodda, Simone N.
Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort global prevalence of help‐seeking for problem gambling: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796401/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35830876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/add.15952
work_keys_str_mv AT bijkerrimke globalprevalenceofhelpseekingforproblemgamblingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT boothnatalia globalprevalenceofhelpseekingforproblemgamblingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT merkourisstephanies globalprevalenceofhelpseekingforproblemgamblingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dowlingnickia globalprevalenceofhelpseekingforproblemgamblingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT roddasimonen globalprevalenceofhelpseekingforproblemgamblingasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis