Cargando…
Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609 |
_version_ | 1784860482910289920 |
---|---|
author | Resnicow, Ken Delacroix, Emerson Chen, Gabriela Austin, Sarah Stoffel, Elena Hanson, Erika N. Gerido, Lynette Hammond Kaphingst, Kimberly A. Yashar, Beverly M. Marvin, Monica Griggs, Jennifer J. Cragun, Deborah |
author_facet | Resnicow, Ken Delacroix, Emerson Chen, Gabriela Austin, Sarah Stoffel, Elena Hanson, Erika N. Gerido, Lynette Hammond Kaphingst, Kimberly A. Yashar, Beverly M. Marvin, Monica Griggs, Jennifer J. Cragun, Deborah |
author_sort | Resnicow, Ken |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally been trained not to persuade the ambivalent or resistant patient. More recently, however, there has been discussion regarding when a greater degree of persuasion or directionality may be appropriate within genetic counseling (GC) and what role MI may play in this process. The role for “persuasive GC” is based on the premise that some genetic tests provide actionable information that would clearly benefit patients and families by impacting treatment or surveillance. For other tests, the benefits are less clear as they do not directly impact patient care or the benefits may be more subjective in nature, driven by patient values or psychological needs. For the former, we propose that GCs may adopt a more persuasive clinical approach while for the latter, a more traditional equipoise stance may be more appropriate. We suggest that motivational interviewing (MI) could serve as a unifying counseling model that allows GCs to handle both persuasive and equipoise encounters. For clearly beneficial tests, while directional, the MI encounter can still be non‐directive, autonomy‐supportive, and patient‐centered. MI can also be adapted for equipoise situations, for example, placing less emphasis on eliciting and strengthening change talk as that is more a behavior change strategy than a shared decision‐making strategy. The core principles and strategies of MI, such as autonomy support, evocation, open questions, reflective listening, and affirmation would apply to both persuasive and equipoise encounters. Key issues that merit discussion include how best to train GCs both during their initial and post‐graduate education. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97964312022-12-30 Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations Resnicow, Ken Delacroix, Emerson Chen, Gabriela Austin, Sarah Stoffel, Elena Hanson, Erika N. Gerido, Lynette Hammond Kaphingst, Kimberly A. Yashar, Beverly M. Marvin, Monica Griggs, Jennifer J. Cragun, Deborah J Genet Couns Professional Issue Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally been trained not to persuade the ambivalent or resistant patient. More recently, however, there has been discussion regarding when a greater degree of persuasion or directionality may be appropriate within genetic counseling (GC) and what role MI may play in this process. The role for “persuasive GC” is based on the premise that some genetic tests provide actionable information that would clearly benefit patients and families by impacting treatment or surveillance. For other tests, the benefits are less clear as they do not directly impact patient care or the benefits may be more subjective in nature, driven by patient values or psychological needs. For the former, we propose that GCs may adopt a more persuasive clinical approach while for the latter, a more traditional equipoise stance may be more appropriate. We suggest that motivational interviewing (MI) could serve as a unifying counseling model that allows GCs to handle both persuasive and equipoise encounters. For clearly beneficial tests, while directional, the MI encounter can still be non‐directive, autonomy‐supportive, and patient‐centered. MI can also be adapted for equipoise situations, for example, placing less emphasis on eliciting and strengthening change talk as that is more a behavior change strategy than a shared decision‐making strategy. The core principles and strategies of MI, such as autonomy support, evocation, open questions, reflective listening, and affirmation would apply to both persuasive and equipoise encounters. Key issues that merit discussion include how best to train GCs both during their initial and post‐graduate education. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796431/ /pubmed/35906848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Professional Issue Resnicow, Ken Delacroix, Emerson Chen, Gabriela Austin, Sarah Stoffel, Elena Hanson, Erika N. Gerido, Lynette Hammond Kaphingst, Kimberly A. Yashar, Beverly M. Marvin, Monica Griggs, Jennifer J. Cragun, Deborah Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title | Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title_full | Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title_fullStr | Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title_full_unstemmed | Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title_short | Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
title_sort | motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: a unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations |
topic | Professional Issue |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT resnicowken motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT delacroixemerson motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT chengabriela motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT austinsarah motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT stoffelelena motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT hansonerikan motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT geridolynettehammond motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT kaphingstkimberlya motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT yasharbeverlym motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT marvinmonica motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT griggsjenniferj motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations AT cragundeborah motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations |