Cargando…

Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations

Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Resnicow, Ken, Delacroix, Emerson, Chen, Gabriela, Austin, Sarah, Stoffel, Elena, Hanson, Erika N., Gerido, Lynette Hammond, Kaphingst, Kimberly A., Yashar, Beverly M., Marvin, Monica, Griggs, Jennifer J., Cragun, Deborah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609
_version_ 1784860482910289920
author Resnicow, Ken
Delacroix, Emerson
Chen, Gabriela
Austin, Sarah
Stoffel, Elena
Hanson, Erika N.
Gerido, Lynette Hammond
Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
Yashar, Beverly M.
Marvin, Monica
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Cragun, Deborah
author_facet Resnicow, Ken
Delacroix, Emerson
Chen, Gabriela
Austin, Sarah
Stoffel, Elena
Hanson, Erika N.
Gerido, Lynette Hammond
Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
Yashar, Beverly M.
Marvin, Monica
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Cragun, Deborah
author_sort Resnicow, Ken
collection PubMed
description Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally been trained not to persuade the ambivalent or resistant patient. More recently, however, there has been discussion regarding when a greater degree of persuasion or directionality may be appropriate within genetic counseling (GC) and what role MI may play in this process. The role for “persuasive GC” is based on the premise that some genetic tests provide actionable information that would clearly benefit patients and families by impacting treatment or surveillance. For other tests, the benefits are less clear as they do not directly impact patient care or the benefits may be more subjective in nature, driven by patient values or psychological needs. For the former, we propose that GCs may adopt a more persuasive clinical approach while for the latter, a more traditional equipoise stance may be more appropriate. We suggest that motivational interviewing (MI) could serve as a unifying counseling model that allows GCs to handle both persuasive and equipoise encounters. For clearly beneficial tests, while directional, the MI encounter can still be non‐directive, autonomy‐supportive, and patient‐centered. MI can also be adapted for equipoise situations, for example, placing less emphasis on eliciting and strengthening change talk as that is more a behavior change strategy than a shared decision‐making strategy. The core principles and strategies of MI, such as autonomy support, evocation, open questions, reflective listening, and affirmation would apply to both persuasive and equipoise encounters. Key issues that merit discussion include how best to train GCs both during their initial and post‐graduate education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97964312022-12-30 Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations Resnicow, Ken Delacroix, Emerson Chen, Gabriela Austin, Sarah Stoffel, Elena Hanson, Erika N. Gerido, Lynette Hammond Kaphingst, Kimberly A. Yashar, Beverly M. Marvin, Monica Griggs, Jennifer J. Cragun, Deborah J Genet Couns Professional Issue Genetic counselors (GCs) have traditionally been trained to adopt a position of equipoise or clinical neutrality. They provide information, answer questions, address barriers, and engage in shared decision‐making, but generally, they do not prescribe a genetic test. Historically, GCs have generally been trained not to persuade the ambivalent or resistant patient. More recently, however, there has been discussion regarding when a greater degree of persuasion or directionality may be appropriate within genetic counseling (GC) and what role MI may play in this process. The role for “persuasive GC” is based on the premise that some genetic tests provide actionable information that would clearly benefit patients and families by impacting treatment or surveillance. For other tests, the benefits are less clear as they do not directly impact patient care or the benefits may be more subjective in nature, driven by patient values or psychological needs. For the former, we propose that GCs may adopt a more persuasive clinical approach while for the latter, a more traditional equipoise stance may be more appropriate. We suggest that motivational interviewing (MI) could serve as a unifying counseling model that allows GCs to handle both persuasive and equipoise encounters. For clearly beneficial tests, while directional, the MI encounter can still be non‐directive, autonomy‐supportive, and patient‐centered. MI can also be adapted for equipoise situations, for example, placing less emphasis on eliciting and strengthening change talk as that is more a behavior change strategy than a shared decision‐making strategy. The core principles and strategies of MI, such as autonomy support, evocation, open questions, reflective listening, and affirmation would apply to both persuasive and equipoise encounters. Key issues that merit discussion include how best to train GCs both during their initial and post‐graduate education. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796431/ /pubmed/35906848 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Genetic Counseling published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Society of Genetic Counselors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Professional Issue
Resnicow, Ken
Delacroix, Emerson
Chen, Gabriela
Austin, Sarah
Stoffel, Elena
Hanson, Erika N.
Gerido, Lynette Hammond
Kaphingst, Kimberly A.
Yashar, Beverly M.
Marvin, Monica
Griggs, Jennifer J.
Cragun, Deborah
Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title_full Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title_fullStr Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title_full_unstemmed Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title_short Motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: A unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
title_sort motivational interviewing for genetic counseling: a unified framework for persuasive and equipoise conversations
topic Professional Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906848
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1609
work_keys_str_mv AT resnicowken motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT delacroixemerson motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT chengabriela motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT austinsarah motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT stoffelelena motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT hansonerikan motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT geridolynettehammond motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT kaphingstkimberlya motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT yasharbeverlym motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT marvinmonica motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT griggsjenniferj motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations
AT cragundeborah motivationalinterviewingforgeneticcounselingaunifiedframeworkforpersuasiveandequipoiseconversations