Cargando…
Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders
AIM: Using Niemann–Pick type C disease (NPC) as a paradigm, we aimed to improve biomarker discovery in patients with neurometabolic disorders. METHOD: Using a multiplexed liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry dried bloodspot assay, we developed a selective intelligent biomarker panel to mon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15334 |
_version_ | 1784860510035902464 |
---|---|
author | Papandreou, Apostolos Doykov, Ivan Spiewak, Justyna Komarov, Nikita Habermann, Stephanie Kurian, Manju A. Mills, Philippa B. Mills, Kevin Gissen, Paul Heywood, Wendy E. |
author_facet | Papandreou, Apostolos Doykov, Ivan Spiewak, Justyna Komarov, Nikita Habermann, Stephanie Kurian, Manju A. Mills, Philippa B. Mills, Kevin Gissen, Paul Heywood, Wendy E. |
author_sort | Papandreou, Apostolos |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Using Niemann–Pick type C disease (NPC) as a paradigm, we aimed to improve biomarker discovery in patients with neurometabolic disorders. METHOD: Using a multiplexed liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry dried bloodspot assay, we developed a selective intelligent biomarker panel to monitor known biomarkers N‐palmitoyl‐O‐phosphocholineserine and 3β,5α,6β‐trihydroxy‐cholanoyl‐glycine as well as compounds predicted to be affected in NPC pathology. We applied this panel to a clinically relevant paediatric patient cohort (n = 75; 35 males, 40 females; mean age 7 years 6 months, range 4 days–19 years 8 months) presenting with neurodevelopmental and/or neurodegenerative pathology, similar to that observed in NPC. RESULTS: The panel had a far superior performance compared with individual biomarkers. Namely, NPC‐related established biomarkers used individually had 91% to 97% specificity but the combined panel had 100% specificity. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed long‐chain isoforms of glucosylceramide were elevated and very specific for patients with NPC. INTERPRETATION: Despite advancements in next‐generation sequencing and precision medicine, neurological non‐enzymatic disorders remain difficult to diagnose and lack robust biomarkers or routine functional testing for genetic variants of unknown significance. Biomarker panels may have better diagnostic accuracy than individual biomarkers in neurometabolic disorders, hence they can facilitate more prompt disease identification and implementation of emerging targeted, disease‐specific therapies. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Intelligent biomarker panel design can help expedite diagnosis in neurometabolic disorders. In Niemann–Pick type C disease, such a panel performed better than individual biomarkers. Biomarker panels are easy to implement and widely applicable to neurometabolic conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97965412022-12-30 Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders Papandreou, Apostolos Doykov, Ivan Spiewak, Justyna Komarov, Nikita Habermann, Stephanie Kurian, Manju A. Mills, Philippa B. Mills, Kevin Gissen, Paul Heywood, Wendy E. Dev Med Child Neurol Original Articles AIM: Using Niemann–Pick type C disease (NPC) as a paradigm, we aimed to improve biomarker discovery in patients with neurometabolic disorders. METHOD: Using a multiplexed liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry dried bloodspot assay, we developed a selective intelligent biomarker panel to monitor known biomarkers N‐palmitoyl‐O‐phosphocholineserine and 3β,5α,6β‐trihydroxy‐cholanoyl‐glycine as well as compounds predicted to be affected in NPC pathology. We applied this panel to a clinically relevant paediatric patient cohort (n = 75; 35 males, 40 females; mean age 7 years 6 months, range 4 days–19 years 8 months) presenting with neurodevelopmental and/or neurodegenerative pathology, similar to that observed in NPC. RESULTS: The panel had a far superior performance compared with individual biomarkers. Namely, NPC‐related established biomarkers used individually had 91% to 97% specificity but the combined panel had 100% specificity. Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed long‐chain isoforms of glucosylceramide were elevated and very specific for patients with NPC. INTERPRETATION: Despite advancements in next‐generation sequencing and precision medicine, neurological non‐enzymatic disorders remain difficult to diagnose and lack robust biomarkers or routine functional testing for genetic variants of unknown significance. Biomarker panels may have better diagnostic accuracy than individual biomarkers in neurometabolic disorders, hence they can facilitate more prompt disease identification and implementation of emerging targeted, disease‐specific therapies. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Intelligent biomarker panel design can help expedite diagnosis in neurometabolic disorders. In Niemann–Pick type C disease, such a panel performed better than individual biomarkers. Biomarker panels are easy to implement and widely applicable to neurometabolic conditions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-14 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9796541/ /pubmed/35833379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15334 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Papandreou, Apostolos Doykov, Ivan Spiewak, Justyna Komarov, Nikita Habermann, Stephanie Kurian, Manju A. Mills, Philippa B. Mills, Kevin Gissen, Paul Heywood, Wendy E. Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title | Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title_full | Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title_fullStr | Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title_short | Niemann–Pick type C disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
title_sort | niemann–pick type c disease as proof‐of‐concept for intelligent biomarker panel selection in neurometabolic disorders |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35833379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papandreouapostolos niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT doykovivan niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT spiewakjustyna niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT komarovnikita niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT habermannstephanie niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT kurianmanjua niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT millsphilippab niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT millskevin niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT gissenpaul niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT heywoodwendye niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders AT niemannpicktypecdiseaseasproofofconceptforintelligentbiomarkerpanelselectioninneurometabolicdisorders |