Cargando…

Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the treatment outcomes of endosseous implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with craniofacial defects resulting from congenital disease, trauma, or oncologic treatment had implant retained prostheses placed in the masto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alberga, Jamie, Eggels, Iris, Visser, Anita, van Minnen, Baucke, Korfage, Anke, Vissink, Arjan, Raghoebar, Gerry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13106
_version_ 1784860515167633408
author Alberga, Jamie
Eggels, Iris
Visser, Anita
van Minnen, Baucke
Korfage, Anke
Vissink, Arjan
Raghoebar, Gerry
author_facet Alberga, Jamie
Eggels, Iris
Visser, Anita
van Minnen, Baucke
Korfage, Anke
Vissink, Arjan
Raghoebar, Gerry
author_sort Alberga, Jamie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the treatment outcomes of endosseous implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with craniofacial defects resulting from congenital disease, trauma, or oncologic treatment had implant retained prostheses placed in the mastoid, orbital, or nasal region and then assessed over a period of up to 30 years. Implant survival rates were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Clinical assessments consisted of scoring skin reactions under the prosthesis and the peri‐implant skin reactions. Possible risk factors for implant loss were identified. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 10‐point VAS‐scale. RESULTS: A total of 525 implants placed in 201 patients were included. The median follow up was 71 months (IQR 28–174 months). Implants placed in the mastoid and nasal region showed the highest overall implant survival rates (10‐year implant survival rates of 93.7% and 92.5%, respectively), while the orbital implants had the lowest overall survival rate (84.2%). Radiotherapy was a significant risk factor for implant loss (HR 3.14, p < 0.001). No differences in implant loss were found between pre‐ and post‐operative radiotherapy (p = 0.89). Soft tissue problems were not frequently encountered, and the patients were highly satisfied with their implant‐retained prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Implants used to retain craniofacial prostheses have high survival and patient satisfaction rates and can thus be considered as a predictable treatment option. Radiation is the most important risk factor for implant loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97965662022-12-30 Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years Alberga, Jamie Eggels, Iris Visser, Anita van Minnen, Baucke Korfage, Anke Vissink, Arjan Raghoebar, Gerry Clin Implant Dent Relat Res Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively assess the treatment outcomes of endosseous implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with craniofacial defects resulting from congenital disease, trauma, or oncologic treatment had implant retained prostheses placed in the mastoid, orbital, or nasal region and then assessed over a period of up to 30 years. Implant survival rates were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Clinical assessments consisted of scoring skin reactions under the prosthesis and the peri‐implant skin reactions. Possible risk factors for implant loss were identified. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using a 10‐point VAS‐scale. RESULTS: A total of 525 implants placed in 201 patients were included. The median follow up was 71 months (IQR 28–174 months). Implants placed in the mastoid and nasal region showed the highest overall implant survival rates (10‐year implant survival rates of 93.7% and 92.5%, respectively), while the orbital implants had the lowest overall survival rate (84.2%). Radiotherapy was a significant risk factor for implant loss (HR 3.14, p < 0.001). No differences in implant loss were found between pre‐ and post‐operative radiotherapy (p = 0.89). Soft tissue problems were not frequently encountered, and the patients were highly satisfied with their implant‐retained prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Implants used to retain craniofacial prostheses have high survival and patient satisfaction rates and can thus be considered as a predictable treatment option. Radiation is the most important risk factor for implant loss. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-06-14 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796566/ /pubmed/35699941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13106 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Alberga, Jamie
Eggels, Iris
Visser, Anita
van Minnen, Baucke
Korfage, Anke
Vissink, Arjan
Raghoebar, Gerry
Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title_full Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title_fullStr Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title_short Outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – A retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
title_sort outcome of implants placed to retain craniofacial prostheses – a retrospective cohort study with a follow‐up of up to 30 years
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35699941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.13106
work_keys_str_mv AT albergajamie outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT eggelsiris outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT visseranita outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT vanminnenbaucke outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT korfageanke outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT vissinkarjan outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years
AT raghoebargerry outcomeofimplantsplacedtoretaincraniofacialprosthesesaretrospectivecohortstudywithafollowupofupto30years