Cargando…
The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511 |
_version_ | 1784860526944190464 |
---|---|
author | Tajima, Tetsuya Hata, Koichiro Kusakabe, Jiro Miyauchi, Hidetaka Yurugi, Kimiko Hishida, Rie Ogawa, Eri Okamoto, Tatsuya Sonoda, Mari Kageyama, Shoichi Zhao, Xiangdong Ito, Takashi Seo, Satoru Okajima, Hideaki Nagao, Miki Haga, Hironori Uemoto, Shinji Hatano, Etsuro |
author_facet | Tajima, Tetsuya Hata, Koichiro Kusakabe, Jiro Miyauchi, Hidetaka Yurugi, Kimiko Hishida, Rie Ogawa, Eri Okamoto, Tatsuya Sonoda, Mari Kageyama, Shoichi Zhao, Xiangdong Ito, Takashi Seo, Satoru Okajima, Hideaki Nagao, Miki Haga, Hironori Uemoto, Shinji Hatano, Etsuro |
author_sort | Tajima, Tetsuya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990–2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between‐siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0–10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult‐to‐adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA‐B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11–5.35; p = 0.03) in between‐siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor–recipient relationships are parent‐to‐child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796617 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97966172022-12-30 The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation Tajima, Tetsuya Hata, Koichiro Kusakabe, Jiro Miyauchi, Hidetaka Yurugi, Kimiko Hishida, Rie Ogawa, Eri Okamoto, Tatsuya Sonoda, Mari Kageyama, Shoichi Zhao, Xiangdong Ito, Takashi Seo, Satoru Okajima, Hideaki Nagao, Miki Haga, Hironori Uemoto, Shinji Hatano, Etsuro Liver Transpl Original Articles Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990–2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between‐siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0–10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult‐to‐adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA‐B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11–5.35; p = 0.03) in between‐siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor–recipient relationships are parent‐to‐child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-04 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796617/ /pubmed/35603526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Liver Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Tajima, Tetsuya Hata, Koichiro Kusakabe, Jiro Miyauchi, Hidetaka Yurugi, Kimiko Hishida, Rie Ogawa, Eri Okamoto, Tatsuya Sonoda, Mari Kageyama, Shoichi Zhao, Xiangdong Ito, Takashi Seo, Satoru Okajima, Hideaki Nagao, Miki Haga, Hironori Uemoto, Shinji Hatano, Etsuro The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title | The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title_full | The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title_fullStr | The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title_short | The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
title_sort | impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796617/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tajimatetsuya theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hatakoichiro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT kusakabejiro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT miyauchihidetaka theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT yurugikimiko theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hishidarie theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT ogawaeri theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT okamototatsuya theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT sonodamari theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT kageyamashoichi theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT zhaoxiangdong theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT itotakashi theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT seosatoru theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT okajimahideaki theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT nagaomiki theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hagahironori theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT uemotoshinji theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hatanoetsuro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT tajimatetsuya impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hatakoichiro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT kusakabejiro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT miyauchihidetaka impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT yurugikimiko impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hishidarie impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT ogawaeri impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT okamototatsuya impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT sonodamari impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT kageyamashoichi impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT zhaoxiangdong impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT itotakashi impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT seosatoru impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT okajimahideaki impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT nagaomiki impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hagahironori impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT uemotoshinji impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT hatanoetsuro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation |