Cargando…

The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation

Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tajima, Tetsuya, Hata, Koichiro, Kusakabe, Jiro, Miyauchi, Hidetaka, Yurugi, Kimiko, Hishida, Rie, Ogawa, Eri, Okamoto, Tatsuya, Sonoda, Mari, Kageyama, Shoichi, Zhao, Xiangdong, Ito, Takashi, Seo, Satoru, Okajima, Hideaki, Nagao, Miki, Haga, Hironori, Uemoto, Shinji, Hatano, Etsuro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511
_version_ 1784860526944190464
author Tajima, Tetsuya
Hata, Koichiro
Kusakabe, Jiro
Miyauchi, Hidetaka
Yurugi, Kimiko
Hishida, Rie
Ogawa, Eri
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Sonoda, Mari
Kageyama, Shoichi
Zhao, Xiangdong
Ito, Takashi
Seo, Satoru
Okajima, Hideaki
Nagao, Miki
Haga, Hironori
Uemoto, Shinji
Hatano, Etsuro
author_facet Tajima, Tetsuya
Hata, Koichiro
Kusakabe, Jiro
Miyauchi, Hidetaka
Yurugi, Kimiko
Hishida, Rie
Ogawa, Eri
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Sonoda, Mari
Kageyama, Shoichi
Zhao, Xiangdong
Ito, Takashi
Seo, Satoru
Okajima, Hideaki
Nagao, Miki
Haga, Hironori
Uemoto, Shinji
Hatano, Etsuro
author_sort Tajima, Tetsuya
collection PubMed
description Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990–2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between‐siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0–10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult‐to‐adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA‐B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11–5.35; p = 0.03) in between‐siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor–recipient relationships are parent‐to‐child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97966172022-12-30 The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation Tajima, Tetsuya Hata, Koichiro Kusakabe, Jiro Miyauchi, Hidetaka Yurugi, Kimiko Hishida, Rie Ogawa, Eri Okamoto, Tatsuya Sonoda, Mari Kageyama, Shoichi Zhao, Xiangdong Ito, Takashi Seo, Satoru Okajima, Hideaki Nagao, Miki Haga, Hironori Uemoto, Shinji Hatano, Etsuro Liver Transpl Original Articles Donor–recipient human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility has not been considered to significantly affect liver transplantation (LT) outcomes; however, its significance in living‐donor LT (LDLT), which is mostly performed between blood relatives, remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study included 1954 LDLTs at our institution (1990–2020). The primary and secondary endpoints were recipient survival and the incidence of T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) after LDLT, respectively, according to the number of HLA mismatches at all five loci: HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ. Subgroup analyses were also performed in between‐siblings that characteristically have widely distributed 0–10 HLA mismatches. A total of 1304 cases of primary LDLTs were finally enrolled, including 631 adults (recipient age at LT ≥18 years) and 673 children (<18 years). In adult‐to‐adult LDLT, the more HLA mismatches at each locus, the significantly worse the recipient survival was (p = 0.03, 0.01, 0.03, 0.001, and <0.001 for HLA‐A, HLA‐B, HLA‐C, HLA‐DR, and HLA‐DQ, respectively). This trend was more pronounced when multiple loci were combined (all p < 0.001 for A + B + DR, A + B + C, DR + DQ, and A + B + C + DR + DQ). Notably, a total of three or more HLA‐B + DR mismatches was an independent risk factor for both TCMR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21–5.87; p = 0.02) and recipient survival (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.11–5.35; p = 0.03) in between‐siblings. By contrast, HLA mismatch did not affect pediatric LDLT outcomes at any locus or in any combinations; however, it should be noted that all donor–recipient relationships are parent‐to‐child that characteristically possesses one or less HLA mismatch at each locus and maximally five or less mismatches in total. In conclusion, HLA mismatch significantly affects not only TCMR development but also recipient survival in adult LDLT, but not in children. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-04 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796617/ /pubmed/35603526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Liver Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Tajima, Tetsuya
Hata, Koichiro
Kusakabe, Jiro
Miyauchi, Hidetaka
Yurugi, Kimiko
Hishida, Rie
Ogawa, Eri
Okamoto, Tatsuya
Sonoda, Mari
Kageyama, Shoichi
Zhao, Xiangdong
Ito, Takashi
Seo, Satoru
Okajima, Hideaki
Nagao, Miki
Haga, Hironori
Uemoto, Shinji
Hatano, Etsuro
The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title_full The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title_fullStr The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title_short The impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
title_sort impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatch on recipient outcomes in living‐donor liver transplantation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35603526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lt.26511
work_keys_str_mv AT tajimatetsuya theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hatakoichiro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kusakabejiro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT miyauchihidetaka theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT yurugikimiko theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hishidarie theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ogawaeri theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT okamototatsuya theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT sonodamari theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kageyamashoichi theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT zhaoxiangdong theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT itotakashi theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT seosatoru theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT okajimahideaki theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT nagaomiki theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hagahironori theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT uemotoshinji theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hatanoetsuro theimpactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT tajimatetsuya impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hatakoichiro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kusakabejiro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT miyauchihidetaka impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT yurugikimiko impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hishidarie impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ogawaeri impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT okamototatsuya impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT sonodamari impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kageyamashoichi impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT zhaoxiangdong impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT itotakashi impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT seosatoru impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT okajimahideaki impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT nagaomiki impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hagahironori impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT uemotoshinji impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT hatanoetsuro impactofhumanleukocyteantigenmismatchonrecipientoutcomesinlivingdonorlivertransplantation