Cargando…

Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of Split‐Window optical coherence tomography OCT (SW‐OCT) biometry in measuring ocular axial dimensions as well as imaging the intraocular lens (IOL) and posterior capsule in pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: Sixty‐nine pseudophakic eyes of 69 subjects were enrolled in th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sikorski, Bartosz L., Hoffer, Kenneth J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15198
_version_ 1784860533053194240
author Sikorski, Bartosz L.
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
author_facet Sikorski, Bartosz L.
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
author_sort Sikorski, Bartosz L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the utility of Split‐Window optical coherence tomography OCT (SW‐OCT) biometry in measuring ocular axial dimensions as well as imaging the intraocular lens (IOL) and posterior capsule in pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: Sixty‐nine pseudophakic eyes of 69 subjects were enrolled in the study. The results of SW‐OCT biometry implemented in the SD OCT device for posterior and anterior segment imaging (REVO NX, Optopol Technology) were compared with those obtained with the SS‐OCT‐based biometer IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Differences in measurement values between the two biometers were determined using the paired t‐test. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: The correlation between measurements obtained with SW‐OCT and SS‐OCT was very high (ICC for: axial length (AL) = 1.000; anterior chamber depth (ACD) = 0.997; IOL thickness (IOL LT) = 0.997; central corneal thickness (CCT) = 0.987). The mean AL measurement difference was 0.003 ± 0.021 mm (the 95% LoA ranged from −0.04 to 0.05); the mean ACD difference was −0.009 ± 0.025 mm (95% LoA, −0.06 to 0.04); mean LT difference was 0.001 ± 0.021 mm (95% LoA, −0.04 to 0.04); and mean CCT difference was 1.4 ± 5.4 μm (95% LoA, −9 to 12). CONCLUSION: The study shows small, non‐significant differences between the biometric measurements obtained with REVO NX SW‐OCT and IOLMaster 700 SS‐OCT in pseudophakic eyes. However, SW‐OCT offered significantly lower ACD and LT measurement failure rates. With high‐resolution imaging, SW‐OCT enables accurate assessment of IOL position relative to the posterior capsule and visualization of capsular fibrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97966422022-12-30 Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes Sikorski, Bartosz L. Hoffer, Kenneth J. Acta Ophthalmol Original Articles PURPOSE: To determine the utility of Split‐Window optical coherence tomography OCT (SW‐OCT) biometry in measuring ocular axial dimensions as well as imaging the intraocular lens (IOL) and posterior capsule in pseudophakic eyes. METHODS: Sixty‐nine pseudophakic eyes of 69 subjects were enrolled in the study. The results of SW‐OCT biometry implemented in the SD OCT device for posterior and anterior segment imaging (REVO NX, Optopol Technology) were compared with those obtained with the SS‐OCT‐based biometer IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Differences in measurement values between the two biometers were determined using the paired t‐test. Agreement was assessed through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: The correlation between measurements obtained with SW‐OCT and SS‐OCT was very high (ICC for: axial length (AL) = 1.000; anterior chamber depth (ACD) = 0.997; IOL thickness (IOL LT) = 0.997; central corneal thickness (CCT) = 0.987). The mean AL measurement difference was 0.003 ± 0.021 mm (the 95% LoA ranged from −0.04 to 0.05); the mean ACD difference was −0.009 ± 0.025 mm (95% LoA, −0.06 to 0.04); mean LT difference was 0.001 ± 0.021 mm (95% LoA, −0.04 to 0.04); and mean CCT difference was 1.4 ± 5.4 μm (95% LoA, −9 to 12). CONCLUSION: The study shows small, non‐significant differences between the biometric measurements obtained with REVO NX SW‐OCT and IOLMaster 700 SS‐OCT in pseudophakic eyes. However, SW‐OCT offered significantly lower ACD and LT measurement failure rates. With high‐resolution imaging, SW‐OCT enables accurate assessment of IOL position relative to the posterior capsule and visualization of capsular fibrosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-07 2022-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9796642/ /pubmed/35670319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15198 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sikorski, Bartosz L.
Hoffer, Kenneth J.
Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title_full Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title_fullStr Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title_full_unstemmed Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title_short Split‐Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes
title_sort split‐window oct biometry in pseudophakic eyes
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35670319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/aos.15198
work_keys_str_mv AT sikorskibartoszl splitwindowoctbiometryinpseudophakiceyes
AT hofferkennethj splitwindowoctbiometryinpseudophakiceyes