Cargando…

Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study

AIM: The aim of this work was to compare the 5‐year overall survival in a national cohort of patients undergoing curative abdominal resection for rectal cancer by laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery. METHOD: All patients diagnosed with clinical Stage I–III rectal cancer and who underwent LAP o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh, Cao, Yang, Petersson, Josefin, Angenete, Eva, Matthiessen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16204
_version_ 1784860534266396672
author Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh
Cao, Yang
Petersson, Josefin
Angenete, Eva
Matthiessen, Peter
author_facet Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh
Cao, Yang
Petersson, Josefin
Angenete, Eva
Matthiessen, Peter
author_sort Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this work was to compare the 5‐year overall survival in a national cohort of patients undergoing curative abdominal resection for rectal cancer by laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery. METHOD: All patients diagnosed with clinical Stage I–III rectal cancer and who underwent LAP or OPEN abdominal curative surgery in Sweden between 2010 and 2016 were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. A noninferiority study design was employed with a statistical power of 90%, a one‐side type I error of 2.5% and a noninferiority margin of 2%. The analyses were performed as intention‐to‐treat and the relationship between surgical technique and overall mortality within 5 years was analysed. Multilevel regression models with the patients matched by propensity scores adjusted for patient‐ and tumour‐related variables were used. RESULTS: A total of 8410 Stage I–III cancer patients were included. This group underwent 2094 LAP (24.9%) and 6316 OPEN (75.1%) procedures and were followed until 31 December 2020. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that 5‐year overall survival was higher in the LAP group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.877; 95% CI 0.775–0.993]. [Correction added on 21 November 2022, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the CI value for LAP group has been corrected from “0.877” to “0.775” in this version.] The outcome was similar when multiple imputation and propensity score matching were employed. When cT4 patients were excluded there was no difference (HR 0.885; 95% CI 0.790–1.033). At 5‐years’ follow‐up local recurrence was not different, at 2.9% for the LAP group and 3.6% for the OPEN group (p = 0.075), while metastatic disease was more frequent in the OPEN group (19.6% compared with 15.6% for LAP; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the LAP technique was not inferior to OPEN surgery with regard to overall 5‐year survival. These results support the use of laparoscopic surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97966482022-12-30 Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh Cao, Yang Petersson, Josefin Angenete, Eva Matthiessen, Peter Colorectal Dis Original Articles AIM: The aim of this work was to compare the 5‐year overall survival in a national cohort of patients undergoing curative abdominal resection for rectal cancer by laparoscopic (LAP) or open (OPEN) surgery. METHOD: All patients diagnosed with clinical Stage I–III rectal cancer and who underwent LAP or OPEN abdominal curative surgery in Sweden between 2010 and 2016 were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. A noninferiority study design was employed with a statistical power of 90%, a one‐side type I error of 2.5% and a noninferiority margin of 2%. The analyses were performed as intention‐to‐treat and the relationship between surgical technique and overall mortality within 5 years was analysed. Multilevel regression models with the patients matched by propensity scores adjusted for patient‐ and tumour‐related variables were used. RESULTS: A total of 8410 Stage I–III cancer patients were included. This group underwent 2094 LAP (24.9%) and 6316 OPEN (75.1%) procedures and were followed until 31 December 2020. Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that 5‐year overall survival was higher in the LAP group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.877; 95% CI 0.775–0.993]. [Correction added on 21 November 2022, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, the CI value for LAP group has been corrected from “0.877” to “0.775” in this version.] The outcome was similar when multiple imputation and propensity score matching were employed. When cT4 patients were excluded there was no difference (HR 0.885; 95% CI 0.790–1.033). At 5‐years’ follow‐up local recurrence was not different, at 2.9% for the LAP group and 3.6% for the OPEN group (p = 0.075), while metastatic disease was more frequent in the OPEN group (19.6% compared with 15.6% for LAP; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the LAP technique was not inferior to OPEN surgery with regard to overall 5‐year survival. These results support the use of laparoscopic surgery. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-11 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9796648/ /pubmed/35656573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16204 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Dehlaghi Jadid, Kaveh
Cao, Yang
Petersson, Josefin
Angenete, Eva
Matthiessen, Peter
Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title_full Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title_fullStr Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title_full_unstemmed Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title_short Long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – A population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
title_sort long term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer – a population‐based nationwide noninferiority study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656573
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/codi.16204
work_keys_str_mv AT dehlaghijadidkaveh longtermoncologicaloutcomesforlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforrectalcancerapopulationbasednationwidenoninferioritystudy
AT caoyang longtermoncologicaloutcomesforlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforrectalcancerapopulationbasednationwidenoninferioritystudy
AT peterssonjosefin longtermoncologicaloutcomesforlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforrectalcancerapopulationbasednationwidenoninferioritystudy
AT angeneteeva longtermoncologicaloutcomesforlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforrectalcancerapopulationbasednationwidenoninferioritystudy
AT matthiessenpeter longtermoncologicaloutcomesforlaparoscopicversusopensurgeryforrectalcancerapopulationbasednationwidenoninferioritystudy