Cargando…
A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial sca...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153 |
_version_ | 1784860549532614656 |
---|---|
author | Siperstein, Robyn Nestor, Elizabeth Meran, Suzanne Grunebaum, Lisa |
author_facet | Siperstein, Robyn Nestor, Elizabeth Meran, Suzanne Grunebaum, Lisa |
author_sort | Siperstein, Robyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars. METHODS & MATERIALS: Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC‐17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch‐up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo‐analysis. RESULTS: According to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC‐17.5L compared with saline (−6.6 VYC‐17.5L vs −1.7 saline [t(28) = −4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = −3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC‐17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30. CONCLUSION: VYC‐17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97967172023-01-04 A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars Siperstein, Robyn Nestor, Elizabeth Meran, Suzanne Grunebaum, Lisa J Cosmet Dermatol Injectable Articles BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars. METHODS & MATERIALS: Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC‐17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch‐up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo‐analysis. RESULTS: According to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC‐17.5L compared with saline (−6.6 VYC‐17.5L vs −1.7 saline [t(28) = −4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = −3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC‐17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30. CONCLUSION: VYC‐17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9796717/ /pubmed/35689521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Injectable Articles Siperstein, Robyn Nestor, Elizabeth Meran, Suzanne Grunebaum, Lisa A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title | A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title_full | A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title_fullStr | A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title_full_unstemmed | A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title_short | A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
title_sort | split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars |
topic | Injectable Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sipersteinrobyn asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT nestorelizabeth asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT meransuzanne asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT grunebaumlisa asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT sipersteinrobyn splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT nestorelizabeth splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT meransuzanne splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars AT grunebaumlisa splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars |