Cargando…

A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial sca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siperstein, Robyn, Nestor, Elizabeth, Meran, Suzanne, Grunebaum, Lisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153
_version_ 1784860549532614656
author Siperstein, Robyn
Nestor, Elizabeth
Meran, Suzanne
Grunebaum, Lisa
author_facet Siperstein, Robyn
Nestor, Elizabeth
Meran, Suzanne
Grunebaum, Lisa
author_sort Siperstein, Robyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars. METHODS & MATERIALS: Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC‐17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch‐up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo‐analysis. RESULTS: According to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC‐17.5L compared with saline (−6.6 VYC‐17.5L vs −1.7 saline [t(28) = −4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = −3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC‐17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30. CONCLUSION: VYC‐17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97967172023-01-04 A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars Siperstein, Robyn Nestor, Elizabeth Meran, Suzanne Grunebaum, Lisa J Cosmet Dermatol Injectable Articles BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid fillers have been studied extensively for facial wrinkles; however, their efficacy for atrophic facial scars has yet to be analyzed in a prospective placebo‐controlled study. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler for atrophic facial scars. METHODS & MATERIALS: Fifteen subjects were randomized to receive up to 1 ml of VYC‐17.5 L on one cheek and up to 1 ml of saline on the other side, with an optional touch‐up treatment. Subjects were graded by a live blind evaluator using the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System (QGSGS) (J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5:48), the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and Canfield photo‐analysis. RESULTS: According to the blind evaluator, there was a significant reduction 90 days after the last treatment on the QGSGS for VYC‐17.5L compared with saline (−6.6 VYC‐17.5L vs −1.7 saline [t(28) = −4.3196, p = 0.008]). There was a smaller, but still significant reduction on the QGSGS for saline alone (10.4 to 8.6 [t(14) = −3.453, p = 0.004]). In addition, 93% (13/14) of subjects chose VYC‐17.5L over saline treatment and reported an improvement on the GAIS. There were no serious side effects and all minor side effects resolved by Day 30. CONCLUSION: VYC‐17.5L achieved significant improvements in rolling atrophic scars as compared to saline, though saline also had modest improvements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-12 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9796717/ /pubmed/35689521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Injectable Articles
Siperstein, Robyn
Nestor, Elizabeth
Meran, Suzanne
Grunebaum, Lisa
A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title_full A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title_fullStr A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title_full_unstemmed A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title_short A split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
title_sort split‐face, blind, randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid filler for the correction of atrophic facial scars
topic Injectable Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15153
work_keys_str_mv AT sipersteinrobyn asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT nestorelizabeth asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT meransuzanne asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT grunebaumlisa asplitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT sipersteinrobyn splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT nestorelizabeth splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT meransuzanne splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars
AT grunebaumlisa splitfaceblindrandomizedplacebocontrolledclinicaltrialinvestigatingtheefficacyandsafetyofhyaluronicacidfillerforthecorrectionofatrophicfacialscars