Cargando…

The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood

We provide a computationally and statistically efficient method for estimating the parameters of a stochastic covariance model observed on a regular spatial grid in any number of dimensions. Our proposed method, which we call the Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood, makes important corrections to th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillaumin, Arthur P., Sykulski, Adam M., Olhede, Sofia C., Simons, Frederik J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12539
_version_ 1784860549784272896
author Guillaumin, Arthur P.
Sykulski, Adam M.
Olhede, Sofia C.
Simons, Frederik J.
author_facet Guillaumin, Arthur P.
Sykulski, Adam M.
Olhede, Sofia C.
Simons, Frederik J.
author_sort Guillaumin, Arthur P.
collection PubMed
description We provide a computationally and statistically efficient method for estimating the parameters of a stochastic covariance model observed on a regular spatial grid in any number of dimensions. Our proposed method, which we call the Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood, makes important corrections to the well‐known Whittle likelihood to account for large sources of bias caused by boundary effects and aliasing. We generalize the approach to flexibly allow for significant volumes of missing data including those with lower‐dimensional substructure, and for irregular sampling boundaries. We build a theoretical framework under relatively weak assumptions which ensures consistency and asymptotic normality in numerous practical settings including missing data and non‐Gaussian processes. We also extend our consistency results to multivariate processes. We provide detailed implementation guidelines which ensure the estimation procedure can be conducted in [Formula: see text] operations, where n is the number of points of the encapsulating rectangular grid, thus keeping the computational scalability of Fourier and Whittle‐based methods for large data sets. We validate our procedure over a range of simulated and realworld settings, and compare with state‐of‐the‐art alternatives, demonstrating the enduring practical appeal of Fourier‐based methods, provided they are corrected by the procedures developed in this paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97967182023-01-04 The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood Guillaumin, Arthur P. Sykulski, Adam M. Olhede, Sofia C. Simons, Frederik J. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol Original Articles We provide a computationally and statistically efficient method for estimating the parameters of a stochastic covariance model observed on a regular spatial grid in any number of dimensions. Our proposed method, which we call the Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood, makes important corrections to the well‐known Whittle likelihood to account for large sources of bias caused by boundary effects and aliasing. We generalize the approach to flexibly allow for significant volumes of missing data including those with lower‐dimensional substructure, and for irregular sampling boundaries. We build a theoretical framework under relatively weak assumptions which ensures consistency and asymptotic normality in numerous practical settings including missing data and non‐Gaussian processes. We also extend our consistency results to multivariate processes. We provide detailed implementation guidelines which ensure the estimation procedure can be conducted in [Formula: see text] operations, where n is the number of points of the encapsulating rectangular grid, thus keeping the computational scalability of Fourier and Whittle‐based methods for large data sets. We validate our procedure over a range of simulated and realworld settings, and compare with state‐of‐the‐art alternatives, demonstrating the enduring practical appeal of Fourier‐based methods, provided they are corrected by the procedures developed in this paper. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-20 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9796718/ /pubmed/36618552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12539 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Royal Statistical Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guillaumin, Arthur P.
Sykulski, Adam M.
Olhede, Sofia C.
Simons, Frederik J.
The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title_full The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title_fullStr The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title_full_unstemmed The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title_short The Debiased Spatial Whittle likelihood
title_sort debiased spatial whittle likelihood
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36618552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12539
work_keys_str_mv AT guillauminarthurp thedebiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT sykulskiadamm thedebiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT olhedesofiac thedebiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT simonsfrederikj thedebiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT guillauminarthurp debiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT sykulskiadamm debiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT olhedesofiac debiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood
AT simonsfrederikj debiasedspatialwhittlelikelihood