Cargando…
Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785 |
_version_ | 1784860560033054720 |
---|---|
author | Rohrbach, Pieter J. Dingemans, Alexandra E. Spinhoven, Philip Van Ginkel, Joost R. Fokkema, Marjolein Wilderjans, Tom F. Bauer, Stephanie Van Furth, Eric F. |
author_facet | Rohrbach, Pieter J. Dingemans, Alexandra E. Spinhoven, Philip Van Ginkel, Joost R. Fokkema, Marjolein Wilderjans, Tom F. Bauer, Stephanie Van Furth, Eric F. |
author_sort | Rohrbach, Pieter J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their combination. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial with a 12‐month follow‐up period was conducted. Participants aged 16 or older with at least mild eating disorder symptoms were randomized to four conditions: (1) Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, (2) chat or email support from a recovered expert patient, (3) Featback with expert‐patient support and (4) a waiting list control condition. The intervention period was 8 weeks and there was a total of six online assessments. The main outcome constituted reduction of eating disorder symptoms over time. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty five participants, of whom 43% had never received eating disorder treatment, were randomized. The three active interventions were superior to a waitlist in reducing eating disorder symptoms (d = −0.38), with no significant difference in effectiveness between the three interventions. Participants in conditions with expert‐patient support were more satisfied with the intervention. DISCUSSION: Internet‐based self‐help, expert‐patient support and their combination were effective in reducing eating disorder symptoms compared to a waiting list control condition. Guidance improved satisfaction with the internet intervention but not its effectiveness. Low‐threshold interventions such as Featback and expert‐patient support can reduce eating disorder symptoms and reach the large group of underserved individuals, complementing existing forms of eating disorder treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Individuals with eating‐related problems who received (1) a fully automated internet‐based intervention, (2) chat and e‐mail support by a recovered individual or (3) their combination, experienced stronger reductions in eating disorder symptoms than those who received (4) usual care. Such brief and easy‐access interventions play an important role in reaching individuals who are currently not reached by other forms of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796760 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97967602023-01-04 Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial Rohrbach, Pieter J. Dingemans, Alexandra E. Spinhoven, Philip Van Ginkel, Joost R. Fokkema, Marjolein Wilderjans, Tom F. Bauer, Stephanie Van Furth, Eric F. Int J Eat Disord Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their combination. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial with a 12‐month follow‐up period was conducted. Participants aged 16 or older with at least mild eating disorder symptoms were randomized to four conditions: (1) Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, (2) chat or email support from a recovered expert patient, (3) Featback with expert‐patient support and (4) a waiting list control condition. The intervention period was 8 weeks and there was a total of six online assessments. The main outcome constituted reduction of eating disorder symptoms over time. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty five participants, of whom 43% had never received eating disorder treatment, were randomized. The three active interventions were superior to a waitlist in reducing eating disorder symptoms (d = −0.38), with no significant difference in effectiveness between the three interventions. Participants in conditions with expert‐patient support were more satisfied with the intervention. DISCUSSION: Internet‐based self‐help, expert‐patient support and their combination were effective in reducing eating disorder symptoms compared to a waiting list control condition. Guidance improved satisfaction with the internet intervention but not its effectiveness. Low‐threshold interventions such as Featback and expert‐patient support can reduce eating disorder symptoms and reach the large group of underserved individuals, complementing existing forms of eating disorder treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Individuals with eating‐related problems who received (1) a fully automated internet‐based intervention, (2) chat and e‐mail support by a recovered individual or (3) their combination, experienced stronger reductions in eating disorder symptoms than those who received (4) usual care. Such brief and easy‐access interventions play an important role in reaching individuals who are currently not reached by other forms of treatment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-07-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796760/ /pubmed/35906929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rohrbach, Pieter J. Dingemans, Alexandra E. Spinhoven, Philip Van Ginkel, Joost R. Fokkema, Marjolein Wilderjans, Tom F. Bauer, Stephanie Van Furth, Eric F. Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title | Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: results from a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796760/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohrbachpieterj effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dingemansalexandrae effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT spinhovenphilip effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanginkeljoostr effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fokkemamarjolein effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wilderjanstomf effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bauerstephanie effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vanfurthericf effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial |