Cargando…

Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rohrbach, Pieter J., Dingemans, Alexandra E., Spinhoven, Philip, Van Ginkel, Joost R., Fokkema, Marjolein, Wilderjans, Tom F., Bauer, Stephanie, Van Furth, Eric F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785
_version_ 1784860560033054720
author Rohrbach, Pieter J.
Dingemans, Alexandra E.
Spinhoven, Philip
Van Ginkel, Joost R.
Fokkema, Marjolein
Wilderjans, Tom F.
Bauer, Stephanie
Van Furth, Eric F.
author_facet Rohrbach, Pieter J.
Dingemans, Alexandra E.
Spinhoven, Philip
Van Ginkel, Joost R.
Fokkema, Marjolein
Wilderjans, Tom F.
Bauer, Stephanie
Van Furth, Eric F.
author_sort Rohrbach, Pieter J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their combination. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial with a 12‐month follow‐up period was conducted. Participants aged 16 or older with at least mild eating disorder symptoms were randomized to four conditions: (1) Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, (2) chat or email support from a recovered expert patient, (3) Featback with expert‐patient support and (4) a waiting list control condition. The intervention period was 8 weeks and there was a total of six online assessments. The main outcome constituted reduction of eating disorder symptoms over time. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty five participants, of whom 43% had never received eating disorder treatment, were randomized. The three active interventions were superior to a waitlist in reducing eating disorder symptoms (d = −0.38), with no significant difference in effectiveness between the three interventions. Participants in conditions with expert‐patient support were more satisfied with the intervention. DISCUSSION: Internet‐based self‐help, expert‐patient support and their combination were effective in reducing eating disorder symptoms compared to a waiting list control condition. Guidance improved satisfaction with the internet intervention but not its effectiveness. Low‐threshold interventions such as Featback and expert‐patient support can reduce eating disorder symptoms and reach the large group of underserved individuals, complementing existing forms of eating disorder treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Individuals with eating‐related problems who received (1) a fully automated internet‐based intervention, (2) chat and e‐mail support by a recovered individual or (3) their combination, experienced stronger reductions in eating disorder symptoms than those who received (4) usual care. Such brief and easy‐access interventions play an important role in reaching individuals who are currently not reached by other forms of treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97967602023-01-04 Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial Rohrbach, Pieter J. Dingemans, Alexandra E. Spinhoven, Philip Van Ginkel, Joost R. Fokkema, Marjolein Wilderjans, Tom F. Bauer, Stephanie Van Furth, Eric F. Int J Eat Disord Original Articles OBJECTIVE: Many individuals with an eating disorder do not receive appropriate care. Low‐threshold interventions could help bridge this treatment gap. The study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, online expert‐patient support and their combination. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial with a 12‐month follow‐up period was conducted. Participants aged 16 or older with at least mild eating disorder symptoms were randomized to four conditions: (1) Featback, a fully automated online self‐help intervention, (2) chat or email support from a recovered expert patient, (3) Featback with expert‐patient support and (4) a waiting list control condition. The intervention period was 8 weeks and there was a total of six online assessments. The main outcome constituted reduction of eating disorder symptoms over time. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty five participants, of whom 43% had never received eating disorder treatment, were randomized. The three active interventions were superior to a waitlist in reducing eating disorder symptoms (d = −0.38), with no significant difference in effectiveness between the three interventions. Participants in conditions with expert‐patient support were more satisfied with the intervention. DISCUSSION: Internet‐based self‐help, expert‐patient support and their combination were effective in reducing eating disorder symptoms compared to a waiting list control condition. Guidance improved satisfaction with the internet intervention but not its effectiveness. Low‐threshold interventions such as Featback and expert‐patient support can reduce eating disorder symptoms and reach the large group of underserved individuals, complementing existing forms of eating disorder treatment. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Individuals with eating‐related problems who received (1) a fully automated internet‐based intervention, (2) chat and e‐mail support by a recovered individual or (3) their combination, experienced stronger reductions in eating disorder symptoms than those who received (4) usual care. Such brief and easy‐access interventions play an important role in reaching individuals who are currently not reached by other forms of treatment. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-07-30 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796760/ /pubmed/35906929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785 Text en © 2022 The Authors. International Journal of Eating Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rohrbach, Pieter J.
Dingemans, Alexandra E.
Spinhoven, Philip
Van Ginkel, Joost R.
Fokkema, Marjolein
Wilderjans, Tom F.
Bauer, Stephanie
Van Furth, Eric F.
Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: Results from a randomized controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of an online self‐help program, expert‐patient support, and their combination for eating disorders: results from a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35906929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.23785
work_keys_str_mv AT rohrbachpieterj effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dingemansalexandrae effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT spinhovenphilip effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanginkeljoostr effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fokkemamarjolein effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wilderjanstomf effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bauerstephanie effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanfurthericf effectivenessofanonlineselfhelpprogramexpertpatientsupportandtheircombinationforeatingdisordersresultsfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial