Cargando…
A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249 |
_version_ | 1784860581656788992 |
---|---|
author | O'Connor, Cathal Rafferty, Siobhán Murphy, Michelle |
author_facet | O'Connor, Cathal Rafferty, Siobhán Murphy, Michelle |
author_sort | O'Connor, Cathal |
collection | PubMed |
description | Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘skin cancer’ OR ‘melanoma’ OR ‘non‐melanoma skin cancer’ OR ‘SCC’ OR ‘BCC’ AND ‘misinformation’ OR ‘disinformation’ OR ‘conspiracy theories’. The most common themes of misinformation related to skin cancer included assertions of the ‘dangers’ of using sunscreen and alternative sunscreen practices; promotion of tanning and Melanotan (an unlicensed and untested form of α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone) as safe practices; claims that risk of skin cancer are limited to people who are older or have fair skin; and assertions of alternative ‘causes’ and alternative ‘cures’ for skin cancer. Sunscreen was particularly vilified as being an ineffective prophylactic measure and a cause of skin cancer. Dermatologists should be aware of misinformation available online relating to skin cancer, and refute and rebut misleading health information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97968462023-01-04 A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer O'Connor, Cathal Rafferty, Siobhán Murphy, Michelle Clin Exp Dermatol Concise Reports Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘skin cancer’ OR ‘melanoma’ OR ‘non‐melanoma skin cancer’ OR ‘SCC’ OR ‘BCC’ AND ‘misinformation’ OR ‘disinformation’ OR ‘conspiracy theories’. The most common themes of misinformation related to skin cancer included assertions of the ‘dangers’ of using sunscreen and alternative sunscreen practices; promotion of tanning and Melanotan (an unlicensed and untested form of α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone) as safe practices; claims that risk of skin cancer are limited to people who are older or have fair skin; and assertions of alternative ‘causes’ and alternative ‘cures’ for skin cancer. Sunscreen was particularly vilified as being an ineffective prophylactic measure and a cause of skin cancer. Dermatologists should be aware of misinformation available online relating to skin cancer, and refute and rebut misleading health information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-15 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796846/ /pubmed/35514125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Concise Reports O'Connor, Cathal Rafferty, Siobhán Murphy, Michelle A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title | A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title_full | A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title_fullStr | A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title_short | A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
title_sort | qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer |
topic | Concise Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnorcathal aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer AT raffertysiobhan aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer AT murphymichelle aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer AT oconnorcathal qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer AT raffertysiobhan qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer AT murphymichelle qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer |