Cargando…

A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer

Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor, Cathal, Rafferty, Siobhán, Murphy, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249
_version_ 1784860581656788992
author O'Connor, Cathal
Rafferty, Siobhán
Murphy, Michelle
author_facet O'Connor, Cathal
Rafferty, Siobhán
Murphy, Michelle
author_sort O'Connor, Cathal
collection PubMed
description Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘skin cancer’ OR ‘melanoma’ OR ‘non‐melanoma skin cancer’ OR ‘SCC’ OR ‘BCC’ AND ‘misinformation’ OR ‘disinformation’ OR ‘conspiracy theories’. The most common themes of misinformation related to skin cancer included assertions of the ‘dangers’ of using sunscreen and alternative sunscreen practices; promotion of tanning and Melanotan (an unlicensed and untested form of α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone) as safe practices; claims that risk of skin cancer are limited to people who are older or have fair skin; and assertions of alternative ‘causes’ and alternative ‘cures’ for skin cancer. Sunscreen was particularly vilified as being an ineffective prophylactic measure and a cause of skin cancer. Dermatologists should be aware of misinformation available online relating to skin cancer, and refute and rebut misleading health information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97968462023-01-04 A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer O'Connor, Cathal Rafferty, Siobhán Murphy, Michelle Clin Exp Dermatol Concise Reports Misinformation on diseases and treatments is a worldwide threat and can lead to worse outcomes for patients with skin cancer. The aim of this study was to qualitatively assess the content of online misinformation related to skin cancer. Searches were performed via PubMed and Google using the terms ‘skin cancer’ OR ‘melanoma’ OR ‘non‐melanoma skin cancer’ OR ‘SCC’ OR ‘BCC’ AND ‘misinformation’ OR ‘disinformation’ OR ‘conspiracy theories’. The most common themes of misinformation related to skin cancer included assertions of the ‘dangers’ of using sunscreen and alternative sunscreen practices; promotion of tanning and Melanotan (an unlicensed and untested form of α‐melanocyte‐stimulating hormone) as safe practices; claims that risk of skin cancer are limited to people who are older or have fair skin; and assertions of alternative ‘causes’ and alternative ‘cures’ for skin cancer. Sunscreen was particularly vilified as being an ineffective prophylactic measure and a cause of skin cancer. Dermatologists should be aware of misinformation available online relating to skin cancer, and refute and rebut misleading health information. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-15 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796846/ /pubmed/35514125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Concise Reports
O'Connor, Cathal
Rafferty, Siobhán
Murphy, Michelle
A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title_full A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title_fullStr A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title_short A qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
title_sort qualitative review of misinformation and conspiracy theories in skin cancer
topic Concise Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35514125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ced.15249
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorcathal aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer
AT raffertysiobhan aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer
AT murphymichelle aqualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer
AT oconnorcathal qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer
AT raffertysiobhan qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer
AT murphymichelle qualitativereviewofmisinformationandconspiracytheoriesinskincancer