Cargando…
No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐can...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757 |
_version_ | 1784860585627746304 |
---|---|
author | Schwarm, Angela Clauss, Marcus Ortmann, Sylvia Jensen, Rasmus B. |
author_facet | Schwarm, Angela Clauss, Marcus Ortmann, Sylvia Jensen, Rasmus B. |
author_sort | Schwarm, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐cannulated horses (562 ± 31 kg) fed a constant amount (6.81 kg dry matter/day) of grass hay. Passage markers representing the liquid (Co‐EDTA) as well as the particulate digesta phase (Yb—undefined; Cr mordanted fibre 1−2 mm; Ce‐mordanted fibre 8 mm) were given as a pulse‐dose into the cannula to measure their mean retention times (MRT). The MRTs were compared by repeated‐measurements analysis of variance. The MRT in the hindgut was 22.2 ± 2.4 h for Co, 25.0 ± 3.4 h for Yb, 26.2 ± 1.6 h for Cr and 26.3 ± 1.5 h for Ce. Whereas differences between the particle marker MRTs were not significant (p (adj. )> 0.05), significant differences were observed between the solute marker Co and each of the particle markers Cr and Ce (p (adj. )< 0.009). The results confirm the well‐known significant, albeit small, difference in MRT in horses between the fluid and the particle digesta phase, and corroborate another recent study that used a combination of whole, marked hay and individual marker analysis in different particle size fractions of the faeces, which also did not detect a selective retention of any particle size class. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9796864 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97968642023-01-04 No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses Schwarm, Angela Clauss, Marcus Ortmann, Sylvia Jensen, Rasmus B. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) Original Articles Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐cannulated horses (562 ± 31 kg) fed a constant amount (6.81 kg dry matter/day) of grass hay. Passage markers representing the liquid (Co‐EDTA) as well as the particulate digesta phase (Yb—undefined; Cr mordanted fibre 1−2 mm; Ce‐mordanted fibre 8 mm) were given as a pulse‐dose into the cannula to measure their mean retention times (MRT). The MRTs were compared by repeated‐measurements analysis of variance. The MRT in the hindgut was 22.2 ± 2.4 h for Co, 25.0 ± 3.4 h for Yb, 26.2 ± 1.6 h for Cr and 26.3 ± 1.5 h for Ce. Whereas differences between the particle marker MRTs were not significant (p (adj. )> 0.05), significant differences were observed between the solute marker Co and each of the particle markers Cr and Ce (p (adj. )< 0.009). The results confirm the well‐known significant, albeit small, difference in MRT in horses between the fluid and the particle digesta phase, and corroborate another recent study that used a combination of whole, marked hay and individual marker analysis in different particle size fractions of the faeces, which also did not detect a selective retention of any particle size class. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-27 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9796864/ /pubmed/35894118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is p roperly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Schwarm, Angela Clauss, Marcus Ortmann, Sylvia Jensen, Rasmus B. No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title | No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title_full | No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title_fullStr | No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title_full_unstemmed | No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title_short | No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
title_sort | no size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796864/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwarmangela nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses AT claussmarcus nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses AT ortmannsylvia nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses AT jensenrasmusb nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses |