Cargando…

No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses

Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schwarm, Angela, Clauss, Marcus, Ortmann, Sylvia, Jensen, Rasmus B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757
_version_ 1784860585627746304
author Schwarm, Angela
Clauss, Marcus
Ortmann, Sylvia
Jensen, Rasmus B.
author_facet Schwarm, Angela
Clauss, Marcus
Ortmann, Sylvia
Jensen, Rasmus B.
author_sort Schwarm, Angela
collection PubMed
description Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐cannulated horses (562 ± 31 kg) fed a constant amount (6.81 kg dry matter/day) of grass hay. Passage markers representing the liquid (Co‐EDTA) as well as the particulate digesta phase (Yb—undefined; Cr mordanted fibre 1−2 mm; Ce‐mordanted fibre 8 mm) were given as a pulse‐dose into the cannula to measure their mean retention times (MRT). The MRTs were compared by repeated‐measurements analysis of variance. The MRT in the hindgut was 22.2 ± 2.4 h for Co, 25.0 ± 3.4 h for Yb, 26.2 ± 1.6 h for Cr and 26.3 ± 1.5 h for Ce. Whereas differences between the particle marker MRTs were not significant (p (adj. )> 0.05), significant differences were observed between the solute marker Co and each of the particle markers Cr and Ce (p (adj. )< 0.009). The results confirm the well‐known significant, albeit small, difference in MRT in horses between the fluid and the particle digesta phase, and corroborate another recent study that used a combination of whole, marked hay and individual marker analysis in different particle size fractions of the faeces, which also did not detect a selective retention of any particle size class.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97968642023-01-04 No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses Schwarm, Angela Clauss, Marcus Ortmann, Sylvia Jensen, Rasmus B. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) Original Articles Sieve analyses of hindgut contents of horses as well as observations in horses where plastic markers had been applied to a caecal cannula suggested that there may be a discrimination by particle size in the passage or retention of digesta. Here, we performed a similar experiment with five caecum‐cannulated horses (562 ± 31 kg) fed a constant amount (6.81 kg dry matter/day) of grass hay. Passage markers representing the liquid (Co‐EDTA) as well as the particulate digesta phase (Yb—undefined; Cr mordanted fibre 1−2 mm; Ce‐mordanted fibre 8 mm) were given as a pulse‐dose into the cannula to measure their mean retention times (MRT). The MRTs were compared by repeated‐measurements analysis of variance. The MRT in the hindgut was 22.2 ± 2.4 h for Co, 25.0 ± 3.4 h for Yb, 26.2 ± 1.6 h for Cr and 26.3 ± 1.5 h for Ce. Whereas differences between the particle marker MRTs were not significant (p (adj. )> 0.05), significant differences were observed between the solute marker Co and each of the particle markers Cr and Ce (p (adj. )< 0.009). The results confirm the well‐known significant, albeit small, difference in MRT in horses between the fluid and the particle digesta phase, and corroborate another recent study that used a combination of whole, marked hay and individual marker analysis in different particle size fractions of the faeces, which also did not detect a selective retention of any particle size class. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-07-27 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9796864/ /pubmed/35894118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is p roperly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schwarm, Angela
Clauss, Marcus
Ortmann, Sylvia
Jensen, Rasmus B.
No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title_full No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title_fullStr No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title_full_unstemmed No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title_short No size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
title_sort no size‐dependent net particle retention in the hindgut of horses
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35894118
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13757
work_keys_str_mv AT schwarmangela nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses
AT claussmarcus nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses
AT ortmannsylvia nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses
AT jensenrasmusb nosizedependentnetparticleretentioninthehindgutofhorses