Cargando…

Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant

AIMS: This study evaluated changes in epiphytic microbial population of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) during the growing season. First cut forage was harvested to study the effects of an inoculant combining two obligate heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria strains on the bacterial and fungal communit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drouin, Pascal, Tremblay, Julien, da Silva, Érica Benjamim, Apper, Emmanuelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15641
_version_ 1784860587913641984
author Drouin, Pascal
Tremblay, Julien
da Silva, Érica Benjamim
Apper, Emmanuelle
author_facet Drouin, Pascal
Tremblay, Julien
da Silva, Érica Benjamim
Apper, Emmanuelle
author_sort Drouin, Pascal
collection PubMed
description AIMS: This study evaluated changes in epiphytic microbial population of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) during the growing season. First cut forage was harvested to study the effects of an inoculant combining two obligate heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria strains on the bacterial and fungal communities and the fermentation of alfalfa silage. METHODS AND RESULTS: The epiphytic microbiome of alfalfa was evaluated 10‐times during the growing season. Alfalfa wilted to 395.0 g/kg was treated with water (Control) or with a combination of L. buchneri NCIMB 40788 and L. hilgardii CNCM‐I‐4785 (LBLH). Mini‐silos were opened after 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 days of ensiling. The relative abundance (RA) of the epiphytic bacterial and fungal families varied during the growing season. After 1 day, Weissella was the most abundant genus and present at similar RA in the two treatments (average 80.4%). Compared with Control, LBLH had a higher RA of Lactobacillus at day 1, 16, 32, and 64, and a lower RA of Weissella from day 8 to 64. Control contained more bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriales than LBLH up to day 16. Inoculated silage had more acetate than Control at day 32 and 64. The fungal population were similar between treatments. The enhanced development and dominance of Lactobacillus in inoculated silage led to greater accumulation of acetate and propionate, which reduced the numbers of culturable yeasts but did not markedly affect the fungal community structure. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial community composition of alfalfa stands in the filed changed over time and was affected by cutting. For the ensiling trial, inoculation modified the composition of the bacterial community of alfalfa, increasing the RA of Lactobacillus while reducing the RA of Weissella and of Enterobacteriaceae. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Inoculation increased the RA of Lactobacillus, hampering the dominance of Weissella in the early stages of ensiling, improving antifungal compounds production and reducing the numbers of culturable yeasts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9796871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97968712023-01-04 Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant Drouin, Pascal Tremblay, Julien da Silva, Érica Benjamim Apper, Emmanuelle J Appl Microbiol Original Articles AIMS: This study evaluated changes in epiphytic microbial population of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) during the growing season. First cut forage was harvested to study the effects of an inoculant combining two obligate heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria strains on the bacterial and fungal communities and the fermentation of alfalfa silage. METHODS AND RESULTS: The epiphytic microbiome of alfalfa was evaluated 10‐times during the growing season. Alfalfa wilted to 395.0 g/kg was treated with water (Control) or with a combination of L. buchneri NCIMB 40788 and L. hilgardii CNCM‐I‐4785 (LBLH). Mini‐silos were opened after 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 days of ensiling. The relative abundance (RA) of the epiphytic bacterial and fungal families varied during the growing season. After 1 day, Weissella was the most abundant genus and present at similar RA in the two treatments (average 80.4%). Compared with Control, LBLH had a higher RA of Lactobacillus at day 1, 16, 32, and 64, and a lower RA of Weissella from day 8 to 64. Control contained more bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriales than LBLH up to day 16. Inoculated silage had more acetate than Control at day 32 and 64. The fungal population were similar between treatments. The enhanced development and dominance of Lactobacillus in inoculated silage led to greater accumulation of acetate and propionate, which reduced the numbers of culturable yeasts but did not markedly affect the fungal community structure. CONCLUSIONS: The bacterial community composition of alfalfa stands in the filed changed over time and was affected by cutting. For the ensiling trial, inoculation modified the composition of the bacterial community of alfalfa, increasing the RA of Lactobacillus while reducing the RA of Weissella and of Enterobacteriaceae. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF STUDY: Inoculation increased the RA of Lactobacillus, hampering the dominance of Weissella in the early stages of ensiling, improving antifungal compounds production and reducing the numbers of culturable yeasts. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-06-13 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9796871/ /pubmed/35633294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15641 Text en © 2022 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and Lallemand Inc. Journal of Applied Microbiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for Applied Microbiology. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of National Research Council Canada. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Drouin, Pascal
Tremblay, Julien
da Silva, Érica Benjamim
Apper, Emmanuelle
Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title_full Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title_fullStr Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title_full_unstemmed Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title_short Changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with Lentilactobacillus buchneri and Lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
title_sort changes to the microbiome of alfalfa during the growing season and after ensiling with lentilactobacillus buchneri and lentilactobacillus hilgardii inoculant
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35633294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jam.15641
work_keys_str_mv AT drouinpascal changestothemicrobiomeofalfalfaduringthegrowingseasonandafterensilingwithlentilactobacillusbuchneriandlentilactobacillushilgardiiinoculant
AT tremblayjulien changestothemicrobiomeofalfalfaduringthegrowingseasonandafterensilingwithlentilactobacillusbuchneriandlentilactobacillushilgardiiinoculant
AT dasilvaericabenjamim changestothemicrobiomeofalfalfaduringthegrowingseasonandafterensilingwithlentilactobacillusbuchneriandlentilactobacillushilgardiiinoculant
AT apperemmanuelle changestothemicrobiomeofalfalfaduringthegrowingseasonandafterensilingwithlentilactobacillusbuchneriandlentilactobacillushilgardiiinoculant