Cargando…
Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices
The development of neural interfaces to provide improved control and somatosensory feedback from prosthetic limbs has initiated a new ability to probe the various dimensions of embodiment. Scientists in the field of neuroprosthetics require dependable measures of ownership, body representation, and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.902162 |
_version_ | 1784860617986801664 |
---|---|
author | Segil, Jacob L. Roldan, Leah Marie Graczyk, Emily L. |
author_facet | Segil, Jacob L. Roldan, Leah Marie Graczyk, Emily L. |
author_sort | Segil, Jacob L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of neural interfaces to provide improved control and somatosensory feedback from prosthetic limbs has initiated a new ability to probe the various dimensions of embodiment. Scientists in the field of neuroprosthetics require dependable measures of ownership, body representation, and agency to quantify the sense of embodiment felt by patients for their prosthetic limbs. These measures are critical to perform generalizable experiments and compare the utility of the new technologies being developed. Here, we review outcome measures used in the literature to evaluate the senses of ownership, body-representation, and agency. We categorize these existing measures based on the fundamental psychometric property measured and whether it is a behavioral or physiological measure. We present arguments for the efficacy and pitfalls of each measure to guide better experimental designs and future outcome measure development. The purpose of this review is to aid prosthesis researchers and technology developers in understanding the concept of embodiment and selecting metrics to assess embodiment in their research. Advances in the ability to measure the embodiment of prosthetic devices have far-reaching implications in the improvement of prosthetic limbs as well as promoting a broader understanding of ourselves as embodied agents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797051 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97970512022-12-29 Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices Segil, Jacob L. Roldan, Leah Marie Graczyk, Emily L. Front Neurorobot Neuroscience The development of neural interfaces to provide improved control and somatosensory feedback from prosthetic limbs has initiated a new ability to probe the various dimensions of embodiment. Scientists in the field of neuroprosthetics require dependable measures of ownership, body representation, and agency to quantify the sense of embodiment felt by patients for their prosthetic limbs. These measures are critical to perform generalizable experiments and compare the utility of the new technologies being developed. Here, we review outcome measures used in the literature to evaluate the senses of ownership, body-representation, and agency. We categorize these existing measures based on the fundamental psychometric property measured and whether it is a behavioral or physiological measure. We present arguments for the efficacy and pitfalls of each measure to guide better experimental designs and future outcome measure development. The purpose of this review is to aid prosthesis researchers and technology developers in understanding the concept of embodiment and selecting metrics to assess embodiment in their research. Advances in the ability to measure the embodiment of prosthetic devices have far-reaching implications in the improvement of prosthetic limbs as well as promoting a broader understanding of ourselves as embodied agents. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9797051/ /pubmed/36590084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.902162 Text en Copyright © 2022 Segil, Roldan and Graczyk. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Segil, Jacob L. Roldan, Leah Marie Graczyk, Emily L. Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title | Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title_full | Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title_fullStr | Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title_short | Measuring embodiment: A review of methods for prosthetic devices |
title_sort | measuring embodiment: a review of methods for prosthetic devices |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797051/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590084 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.902162 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT segiljacobl measuringembodimentareviewofmethodsforprostheticdevices AT roldanleahmarie measuringembodimentareviewofmethodsforprostheticdevices AT graczykemilyl measuringembodimentareviewofmethodsforprostheticdevices |