Cargando…
Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of viole...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569 |
_version_ | 1784860626605047808 |
---|---|
author | Bowling, Jessamyn Montanaro, Erika Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero McCabe, Sean Farris, Shayna Saint-Cyr, Neielle Glaser, Wade Cramer, Robert J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer Mennicke, Annelise |
author_facet | Bowling, Jessamyn Montanaro, Erika Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero McCabe, Sean Farris, Shayna Saint-Cyr, Neielle Glaser, Wade Cramer, Robert J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer Mennicke, Annelise |
author_sort | Bowling, Jessamyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of violence affects the immediate community and the larger public. These responses may reflect either content (e.g. context-specific) or emotions (e.g. humor). Aims Using Twitter data, we analyzed the emotional responses as well as the nature of non-affective short-term reactions, in response to the April 2019 shooting at UNC Charlotte. Methods Drawn from a pool of tweets between 4/30/19-5/7/19, we analyzed 16,749 tweets using keywords related to the mass shooting (e.g. “shooting,” “gun violence,” “UNC Charlotte”). A coding team manually coded the tweets using content and sentiment analyses. Results Overall, 7,148 (42.67%) tweets contained negative emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, disgust, anxiety), 5,088 (30.38%) contained positive emotions (e.g. humor, hope, appreciation), 14,892 (88.91%) were communal responses to the shooting (e.g. prayers, healing, victim remembrance), 8,329 (49.73%) were action-oriented (e.g. action taken, policy advocacy), and 15,498 (92.53%) included information (e.g. death/injury, news). All tweets except positive emotions peaked one day following the incident. Conclusions Our findings point to peaks in most emotions in the 24 hours following the event, with the exception of positive emotions which peaked one day later. Social media responses to a campus shooting suggest college preparedness for immediate deployment of supportive responses in the case of campus violence is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97970862022-12-29 Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting Bowling, Jessamyn Montanaro, Erika Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero McCabe, Sean Farris, Shayna Saint-Cyr, Neielle Glaser, Wade Cramer, Robert J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer Mennicke, Annelise PLoS One Research Article Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of violence affects the immediate community and the larger public. These responses may reflect either content (e.g. context-specific) or emotions (e.g. humor). Aims Using Twitter data, we analyzed the emotional responses as well as the nature of non-affective short-term reactions, in response to the April 2019 shooting at UNC Charlotte. Methods Drawn from a pool of tweets between 4/30/19-5/7/19, we analyzed 16,749 tweets using keywords related to the mass shooting (e.g. “shooting,” “gun violence,” “UNC Charlotte”). A coding team manually coded the tweets using content and sentiment analyses. Results Overall, 7,148 (42.67%) tweets contained negative emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, disgust, anxiety), 5,088 (30.38%) contained positive emotions (e.g. humor, hope, appreciation), 14,892 (88.91%) were communal responses to the shooting (e.g. prayers, healing, victim remembrance), 8,329 (49.73%) were action-oriented (e.g. action taken, policy advocacy), and 15,498 (92.53%) included information (e.g. death/injury, news). All tweets except positive emotions peaked one day following the incident. Conclusions Our findings point to peaks in most emotions in the 24 hours following the event, with the exception of positive emotions which peaked one day later. Social media responses to a campus shooting suggest college preparedness for immediate deployment of supportive responses in the case of campus violence is needed. Public Library of Science 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9797086/ /pubmed/36576914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569 Text en © 2022 Bowling et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bowling, Jessamyn Montanaro, Erika Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero McCabe, Sean Farris, Shayna Saint-Cyr, Neielle Glaser, Wade Cramer, Robert J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer Mennicke, Annelise Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title | Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title_full | Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title_fullStr | Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title_full_unstemmed | Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title_short | Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
title_sort | coming together in a digital age: community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bowlingjessamyn comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT montanaroerika comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT ordonezsaraiguerrero comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT mccabesean comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT farrisshayna comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT saintcyrneielle comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT glaserwade comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT cramerrobertj comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT langhinrichsenrohlingjennifer comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting AT mennickeannelise comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting |