Cargando…

Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting

Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of viole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowling, Jessamyn, Montanaro, Erika, Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero, McCabe, Sean, Farris, Shayna, Saint-Cyr, Neielle, Glaser, Wade, Cramer, Robert J., Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer, Mennicke, Annelise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569
_version_ 1784860626605047808
author Bowling, Jessamyn
Montanaro, Erika
Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero
McCabe, Sean
Farris, Shayna
Saint-Cyr, Neielle
Glaser, Wade
Cramer, Robert J.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer
Mennicke, Annelise
author_facet Bowling, Jessamyn
Montanaro, Erika
Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero
McCabe, Sean
Farris, Shayna
Saint-Cyr, Neielle
Glaser, Wade
Cramer, Robert J.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer
Mennicke, Annelise
author_sort Bowling, Jessamyn
collection PubMed
description Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of violence affects the immediate community and the larger public. These responses may reflect either content (e.g. context-specific) or emotions (e.g. humor). Aims Using Twitter data, we analyzed the emotional responses as well as the nature of non-affective short-term reactions, in response to the April 2019 shooting at UNC Charlotte. Methods Drawn from a pool of tweets between 4/30/19-5/7/19, we analyzed 16,749 tweets using keywords related to the mass shooting (e.g. “shooting,” “gun violence,” “UNC Charlotte”). A coding team manually coded the tweets using content and sentiment analyses. Results Overall, 7,148 (42.67%) tweets contained negative emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, disgust, anxiety), 5,088 (30.38%) contained positive emotions (e.g. humor, hope, appreciation), 14,892 (88.91%) were communal responses to the shooting (e.g. prayers, healing, victim remembrance), 8,329 (49.73%) were action-oriented (e.g. action taken, policy advocacy), and 15,498 (92.53%) included information (e.g. death/injury, news). All tweets except positive emotions peaked one day following the incident. Conclusions Our findings point to peaks in most emotions in the 24 hours following the event, with the exception of positive emotions which peaked one day later. Social media responses to a campus shooting suggest college preparedness for immediate deployment of supportive responses in the case of campus violence is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97970862022-12-29 Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting Bowling, Jessamyn Montanaro, Erika Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero McCabe, Sean Farris, Shayna Saint-Cyr, Neielle Glaser, Wade Cramer, Robert J. Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer Mennicke, Annelise PLoS One Research Article Campus mass shootings have become a pressing policy and public health matter. Twitter is a platform used for processing events among interested community members. Examining the responses of invested community members to a mass shooting on a college campus provides evidence for how this type of violence affects the immediate community and the larger public. These responses may reflect either content (e.g. context-specific) or emotions (e.g. humor). Aims Using Twitter data, we analyzed the emotional responses as well as the nature of non-affective short-term reactions, in response to the April 2019 shooting at UNC Charlotte. Methods Drawn from a pool of tweets between 4/30/19-5/7/19, we analyzed 16,749 tweets using keywords related to the mass shooting (e.g. “shooting,” “gun violence,” “UNC Charlotte”). A coding team manually coded the tweets using content and sentiment analyses. Results Overall, 7,148 (42.67%) tweets contained negative emotions (e.g. anger, sadness, disgust, anxiety), 5,088 (30.38%) contained positive emotions (e.g. humor, hope, appreciation), 14,892 (88.91%) were communal responses to the shooting (e.g. prayers, healing, victim remembrance), 8,329 (49.73%) were action-oriented (e.g. action taken, policy advocacy), and 15,498 (92.53%) included information (e.g. death/injury, news). All tweets except positive emotions peaked one day following the incident. Conclusions Our findings point to peaks in most emotions in the 24 hours following the event, with the exception of positive emotions which peaked one day later. Social media responses to a campus shooting suggest college preparedness for immediate deployment of supportive responses in the case of campus violence is needed. Public Library of Science 2022-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9797086/ /pubmed/36576914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569 Text en © 2022 Bowling et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowling, Jessamyn
Montanaro, Erika
Ordonez, Sarai Guerrero
McCabe, Sean
Farris, Shayna
Saint-Cyr, Neielle
Glaser, Wade
Cramer, Robert J.
Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Jennifer
Mennicke, Annelise
Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title_full Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title_fullStr Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title_full_unstemmed Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title_short Coming together in a digital age: Community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
title_sort coming together in a digital age: community twitter responses in the wake of a campus shooting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36576914
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279569
work_keys_str_mv AT bowlingjessamyn comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT montanaroerika comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT ordonezsaraiguerrero comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT mccabesean comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT farrisshayna comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT saintcyrneielle comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT glaserwade comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT cramerrobertj comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT langhinrichsenrohlingjennifer comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting
AT mennickeannelise comingtogetherinadigitalagecommunitytwitterresponsesinthewakeofacampusshooting