Cargando…

Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who und...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Qian, Li, Xinyu, Li, Jianying, Cheng, Yannan, Niu, Xinyi, Zhu, Shumeng, Xu, Wenting, Guo, Jianxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796
_version_ 1784860635989803008
author Tian, Qian
Li, Xinyu
Li, Jianying
Cheng, Yannan
Niu, Xinyi
Zhu, Shumeng
Xu, Wenting
Guo, Jianxin
author_facet Tian, Qian
Li, Xinyu
Li, Jianying
Cheng, Yannan
Niu, Xinyi
Zhu, Shumeng
Xu, Wenting
Guo, Jianxin
author_sort Tian, Qian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent low‐dose CT for lung cancer screening. Images were reconstructed with ASiR‐V40% and DLIR at low (DLIR‐L), medium (DLIR‐M), and high (DLIR‐H) levels. CT value and standard deviation of lung tissue, erector spinae muscles, aorta, and fat were measured and compared across the four reconstructions. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blind readers from three aspects: image noise, artifact, and visualization of small structures. RESULTS: The effective dose was 1.03 ± 0.36 mSv. There was no significant difference in CT values of erector spinae muscles and aorta, whereas the maximum difference for lung tissue and fat was less than 5 HU among the four reconstructions. Compared with ASiR‐V40%, the DLIR‐L, DLIR‐M, and DLIR‐H reconstructions reduced the noise in aorta by 11.44%, 33.03%, and 56.1%, respectively, and had significantly higher subjective quality scores in image artifacts (all p < 0.001). ASiR‐V40%, DLIR‐L, and DLIR‐M had equivalent score in visualizing small structures (all p > 0.05), whereas DLIR‐H had slightly lower score. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASiR‐V40%, DLIR significantly reduces image noise in low‐dose chest CT. DLIR strength is important and should be adjusted for different diagnostic needs in clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97971602022-12-30 Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction Tian, Qian Li, Xinyu Li, Jianying Cheng, Yannan Niu, Xinyi Zhu, Shumeng Xu, Wenting Guo, Jianxin J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent low‐dose CT for lung cancer screening. Images were reconstructed with ASiR‐V40% and DLIR at low (DLIR‐L), medium (DLIR‐M), and high (DLIR‐H) levels. CT value and standard deviation of lung tissue, erector spinae muscles, aorta, and fat were measured and compared across the four reconstructions. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blind readers from three aspects: image noise, artifact, and visualization of small structures. RESULTS: The effective dose was 1.03 ± 0.36 mSv. There was no significant difference in CT values of erector spinae muscles and aorta, whereas the maximum difference for lung tissue and fat was less than 5 HU among the four reconstructions. Compared with ASiR‐V40%, the DLIR‐L, DLIR‐M, and DLIR‐H reconstructions reduced the noise in aorta by 11.44%, 33.03%, and 56.1%, respectively, and had significantly higher subjective quality scores in image artifacts (all p < 0.001). ASiR‐V40%, DLIR‐L, and DLIR‐M had equivalent score in visualizing small structures (all p > 0.05), whereas DLIR‐H had slightly lower score. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASiR‐V40%, DLIR significantly reduces image noise in low‐dose chest CT. DLIR strength is important and should be adjusted for different diagnostic needs in clinical application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9797160/ /pubmed/36210060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Medical Imaging
Tian, Qian
Li, Xinyu
Li, Jianying
Cheng, Yannan
Niu, Xinyi
Zhu, Shumeng
Xu, Wenting
Guo, Jianxin
Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title_full Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title_fullStr Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title_short Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
title_sort image quality improvement in low‐dose chest ct with deep learning image reconstruction
topic Medical Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796
work_keys_str_mv AT tianqian imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT lixinyu imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT lijianying imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT chengyannan imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT niuxinyi imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT zhushumeng imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT xuwenting imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction
AT guojianxin imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction