Cargando…
Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who und...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796 |
_version_ | 1784860635989803008 |
---|---|
author | Tian, Qian Li, Xinyu Li, Jianying Cheng, Yannan Niu, Xinyi Zhu, Shumeng Xu, Wenting Guo, Jianxin |
author_facet | Tian, Qian Li, Xinyu Li, Jianying Cheng, Yannan Niu, Xinyi Zhu, Shumeng Xu, Wenting Guo, Jianxin |
author_sort | Tian, Qian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent low‐dose CT for lung cancer screening. Images were reconstructed with ASiR‐V40% and DLIR at low (DLIR‐L), medium (DLIR‐M), and high (DLIR‐H) levels. CT value and standard deviation of lung tissue, erector spinae muscles, aorta, and fat were measured and compared across the four reconstructions. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blind readers from three aspects: image noise, artifact, and visualization of small structures. RESULTS: The effective dose was 1.03 ± 0.36 mSv. There was no significant difference in CT values of erector spinae muscles and aorta, whereas the maximum difference for lung tissue and fat was less than 5 HU among the four reconstructions. Compared with ASiR‐V40%, the DLIR‐L, DLIR‐M, and DLIR‐H reconstructions reduced the noise in aorta by 11.44%, 33.03%, and 56.1%, respectively, and had significantly higher subjective quality scores in image artifacts (all p < 0.001). ASiR‐V40%, DLIR‐L, and DLIR‐M had equivalent score in visualizing small structures (all p > 0.05), whereas DLIR‐H had slightly lower score. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASiR‐V40%, DLIR significantly reduces image noise in low‐dose chest CT. DLIR strength is important and should be adjusted for different diagnostic needs in clinical application. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797160 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97971602022-12-30 Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction Tian, Qian Li, Xinyu Li, Jianying Cheng, Yannan Niu, Xinyi Zhu, Shumeng Xu, Wenting Guo, Jianxin J Appl Clin Med Phys Medical Imaging OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) for improving image quality in low‐dose chest CT in comparison with 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction‐Veo (ASiR‐V40%) algorithm. METHODS: This retrospective study included 86 patients who underwent low‐dose CT for lung cancer screening. Images were reconstructed with ASiR‐V40% and DLIR at low (DLIR‐L), medium (DLIR‐M), and high (DLIR‐H) levels. CT value and standard deviation of lung tissue, erector spinae muscles, aorta, and fat were measured and compared across the four reconstructions. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two blind readers from three aspects: image noise, artifact, and visualization of small structures. RESULTS: The effective dose was 1.03 ± 0.36 mSv. There was no significant difference in CT values of erector spinae muscles and aorta, whereas the maximum difference for lung tissue and fat was less than 5 HU among the four reconstructions. Compared with ASiR‐V40%, the DLIR‐L, DLIR‐M, and DLIR‐H reconstructions reduced the noise in aorta by 11.44%, 33.03%, and 56.1%, respectively, and had significantly higher subjective quality scores in image artifacts (all p < 0.001). ASiR‐V40%, DLIR‐L, and DLIR‐M had equivalent score in visualizing small structures (all p > 0.05), whereas DLIR‐H had slightly lower score. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ASiR‐V40%, DLIR significantly reduces image noise in low‐dose chest CT. DLIR strength is important and should be adjusted for different diagnostic needs in clinical application. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9797160/ /pubmed/36210060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medical Imaging Tian, Qian Li, Xinyu Li, Jianying Cheng, Yannan Niu, Xinyi Zhu, Shumeng Xu, Wenting Guo, Jianxin Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title | Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title_full | Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title_short | Image quality improvement in low‐dose chest CT with deep learning image reconstruction |
title_sort | image quality improvement in low‐dose chest ct with deep learning image reconstruction |
topic | Medical Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797160/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tianqian imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT lixinyu imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT lijianying imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT chengyannan imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT niuxinyi imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT zhushumeng imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT xuwenting imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction AT guojianxin imagequalityimprovementinlowdosechestctwithdeeplearningimagereconstruction |