Cargando…

Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cub...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tominaga, Yuki, Sakurai, Yusuke, Miyata, Junya, Harada, Shuichi, Akagi, Takashi, Oita, Masataka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13817
_version_ 1784860637456760832
author Tominaga, Yuki
Sakurai, Yusuke
Miyata, Junya
Harada, Shuichi
Akagi, Takashi
Oita, Masataka
author_facet Tominaga, Yuki
Sakurai, Yusuke
Miyata, Junya
Harada, Shuichi
Akagi, Takashi
Oita, Masataka
author_sort Tominaga, Yuki
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cubic targets were optimized by the RayStation 9A treatment planning system (TPS), varying scan area, modulation widths, measurement depths, and collimator angles. To test the patient‐specific measurements, we also created and verified five clinically realistic PBS plans with the MLC, such as the liver, prostate, base‐of‐skull, C‐shape, and head‐and‐neck. The verification measurements consist of the depth dose (DD), lateral profile (LP), and absolute dose (AD). We compared the LPs and ADs between the calculation and measurements. For the cubic plans, the gamma index pass rates (γ‐passing) were on average 96.5% ± 4.0% at 3%/3 mm for the DD and 95.2% ± 7.6% at 2%/2 mm for the LP. In several LP measurements less than 75 mm depths, the γ‐passing deteriorated (increased the measured doses) by less than 90% with the scattering such as the MLC edge and range shifter. The deteriorated γ‐passing was satisfied by more than 90% at 2%/2 mm using uncollimated beams instead of collimated beams except for three planes. The AD differences and the lateral penumbra width (80%–20% distance) were within ±1.9% and ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the clinical plan measurements, the γ‐passing of LP at 2%/2 mm and the AD differences were 97.7% ± 4.2% on average and within ±1.8%, respectively. The measurements were in good agreement with the calculations of both the cubic and clinical plans inserted in the MLC except for LPs less than 75 mm regions of some cubic and clinical plans. The calculation errors in collimated beams can be mitigated by substituting uncollimated beams.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97971662022-12-30 Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine Tominaga, Yuki Sakurai, Yusuke Miyata, Junya Harada, Shuichi Akagi, Takashi Oita, Masataka J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to evaluate the clinical beam commissioning results and lateral penumbra characteristics of our new pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy using a multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) calculated by use of a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine. Eighteen collimated uniform dose plans for cubic targets were optimized by the RayStation 9A treatment planning system (TPS), varying scan area, modulation widths, measurement depths, and collimator angles. To test the patient‐specific measurements, we also created and verified five clinically realistic PBS plans with the MLC, such as the liver, prostate, base‐of‐skull, C‐shape, and head‐and‐neck. The verification measurements consist of the depth dose (DD), lateral profile (LP), and absolute dose (AD). We compared the LPs and ADs between the calculation and measurements. For the cubic plans, the gamma index pass rates (γ‐passing) were on average 96.5% ± 4.0% at 3%/3 mm for the DD and 95.2% ± 7.6% at 2%/2 mm for the LP. In several LP measurements less than 75 mm depths, the γ‐passing deteriorated (increased the measured doses) by less than 90% with the scattering such as the MLC edge and range shifter. The deteriorated γ‐passing was satisfied by more than 90% at 2%/2 mm using uncollimated beams instead of collimated beams except for three planes. The AD differences and the lateral penumbra width (80%–20% distance) were within ±1.9% and ± 1.1 mm, respectively. For the clinical plan measurements, the γ‐passing of LP at 2%/2 mm and the AD differences were 97.7% ± 4.2% on average and within ±1.8%, respectively. The measurements were in good agreement with the calculations of both the cubic and clinical plans inserted in the MLC except for LPs less than 75 mm regions of some cubic and clinical plans. The calculation errors in collimated beams can be mitigated by substituting uncollimated beams. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9797166/ /pubmed/36420959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13817 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Tominaga, Yuki
Sakurai, Yusuke
Miyata, Junya
Harada, Shuichi
Akagi, Takashi
Oita, Masataka
Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title_full Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title_fullStr Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title_full_unstemmed Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title_short Validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial Monte Carlo dose engine
title_sort validation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy with multi‐leaf collimator calculated by a commercial monte carlo dose engine
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13817
work_keys_str_mv AT tominagayuki validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine
AT sakuraiyusuke validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine
AT miyatajunya validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine
AT haradashuichi validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine
AT akagitakashi validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine
AT oitamasataka validationofpencilbeamscanningprotontherapywithmultileafcollimatorcalculatedbyacommercialmontecarlodoseengine