Cargando…

Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements

PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the SunCHECK PerFRACTION, the software for in vivo monitoring using EPID images. MATERIALS/METHODS: First, the PerFRACTION ability to detect errors was investigated simulating two situations: (1) variation of LINAC output and (2) variation of the phantom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Avelino, Samuel Ramalho, Dias, Juliana Rosada, Peron, Taís Marques, Vidal, Gabriel Souza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36356260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13822
_version_ 1784860639898894336
author Avelino, Samuel Ramalho
Dias, Juliana Rosada
Peron, Taís Marques
Vidal, Gabriel Souza
author_facet Avelino, Samuel Ramalho
Dias, Juliana Rosada
Peron, Taís Marques
Vidal, Gabriel Souza
author_sort Avelino, Samuel Ramalho
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the SunCHECK PerFRACTION, the software for in vivo monitoring using EPID images. MATERIALS/METHODS: First, the PerFRACTION ability to detect errors was investigated simulating two situations: (1) variation of LINAC output and (2) variation of the phantom thickness. An ionization chamber was used as reference to measure the introduced dose variations. Both tests used EPID in integrated mode (absolute dose). Second, EPID measurements in integrated mode were carried out during an independent Brazilian governmental audit that provided four phantoms and TLDs. PerFRACTION calculated the absolute dose on EPID plane, and it compared with predicted calculated dose for every delivered plan. The dose deviations reported using PerFRACTION were compared with dose deviations reported by the independent audit. Third, an end‐to‐end test using a heterogeneous phantom was performed. A VMAT plan with EPID in cine mode was delivered. PerFRACTION calculated the mean dose on CBCT using EPID information and log files. The calculated doses at four different points were compared with ionization chambers measurements. RESULTS: About the first test, the largest difference found was 1.2%. Considering the audit results, the variations detected by TLD measurements and by PerFRACTION dose calculation on EPID plane were close: 12 points had variations less than 2%, 2 points with variation between 2% and 3%, and 2 points with deviations greater than 3% (max 3.7%). The end‐to‐end tests using a heterogeneous phantom achieved dose deviation less than 1.0% in the water‐equivalent region. In the mimicking lung region, the deviations were higher (max 7.3%), but in accordance with what is expected for complex situations. CONCLUSION: The tests results indicate that PerFRACTION dose calculations in different situations have good agreement with standard measurements. Action levels were suggested for absolute dose on EPID plane as well as 3D dose calculation on CBCT using PerFRACTION.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97971762022-12-30 Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements Avelino, Samuel Ramalho Dias, Juliana Rosada Peron, Taís Marques Vidal, Gabriel Souza J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the SunCHECK PerFRACTION, the software for in vivo monitoring using EPID images. MATERIALS/METHODS: First, the PerFRACTION ability to detect errors was investigated simulating two situations: (1) variation of LINAC output and (2) variation of the phantom thickness. An ionization chamber was used as reference to measure the introduced dose variations. Both tests used EPID in integrated mode (absolute dose). Second, EPID measurements in integrated mode were carried out during an independent Brazilian governmental audit that provided four phantoms and TLDs. PerFRACTION calculated the absolute dose on EPID plane, and it compared with predicted calculated dose for every delivered plan. The dose deviations reported using PerFRACTION were compared with dose deviations reported by the independent audit. Third, an end‐to‐end test using a heterogeneous phantom was performed. A VMAT plan with EPID in cine mode was delivered. PerFRACTION calculated the mean dose on CBCT using EPID information and log files. The calculated doses at four different points were compared with ionization chambers measurements. RESULTS: About the first test, the largest difference found was 1.2%. Considering the audit results, the variations detected by TLD measurements and by PerFRACTION dose calculation on EPID plane were close: 12 points had variations less than 2%, 2 points with variation between 2% and 3%, and 2 points with deviations greater than 3% (max 3.7%). The end‐to‐end tests using a heterogeneous phantom achieved dose deviation less than 1.0% in the water‐equivalent region. In the mimicking lung region, the deviations were higher (max 7.3%), but in accordance with what is expected for complex situations. CONCLUSION: The tests results indicate that PerFRACTION dose calculations in different situations have good agreement with standard measurements. Action levels were suggested for absolute dose on EPID plane as well as 3D dose calculation on CBCT using PerFRACTION. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9797176/ /pubmed/36356260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13822 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Avelino, Samuel Ramalho
Dias, Juliana Rosada
Peron, Taís Marques
Vidal, Gabriel Souza
Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title_full Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title_fullStr Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title_short Evaluation of an EPID in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
title_sort evaluation of an epid in vivo monitoring system using local and external independent audit measurements
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36356260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13822
work_keys_str_mv AT avelinosamuelramalho evaluationofanepidinvivomonitoringsystemusinglocalandexternalindependentauditmeasurements
AT diasjulianarosada evaluationofanepidinvivomonitoringsystemusinglocalandexternalindependentauditmeasurements
AT perontaismarques evaluationofanepidinvivomonitoringsystemusinglocalandexternalindependentauditmeasurements
AT vidalgabrielsouza evaluationofanepidinvivomonitoringsystemusinglocalandexternalindependentauditmeasurements