Cargando…
Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy
PURPOSE: The shallow depth of maximum dose and higher dose fall‐off gradient of a 2.5 MV beam along the central axis that is available for imaging on linear accelerators is investigated for treatment of shallow tumors and sparing the organs at risk (OARs) beyond it. In addition, the 2.5 MV beam has...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13811 |
_version_ | 1784860640403259392 |
---|---|
author | Khaledi, Navid Hayes, Chris Belshaw, Louise Grattan, Mark Khan, Rao Gräfe, James L. |
author_facet | Khaledi, Navid Hayes, Chris Belshaw, Louise Grattan, Mark Khan, Rao Gräfe, James L. |
author_sort | Khaledi, Navid |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The shallow depth of maximum dose and higher dose fall‐off gradient of a 2.5 MV beam along the central axis that is available for imaging on linear accelerators is investigated for treatment of shallow tumors and sparing the organs at risk (OARs) beyond it. In addition, the 2.5 MV beam has an energy bridging the gap between kilo‐voltage (kV) and mega‐voltage (MV) beams for applications of dose enhancement with high atomic number (Z) nanoparticles. METHODS: We have commissioned and utilized a MATLAB‐based, open‐source treatment planning software (TPS), matRad, for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. Treatment plans for prostate, liver, and head and neck (H&N), nasal cavity, two orbit cases, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were performed and compared to a conventional 6 MV beam. Additional Monte Carlo calculations were also used for benchmarking the central axis dose. RESULTS: Both beams had similar planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage for all cases. However, the 2.5 MV beam deposited 6%–19% less integral doses to the nasal cavity, orbit, and GBM cases than 6 MV photons. The mean dose to the heart in the liver plan was 10.5% lower for 2.5 MV beam. The difference between the doses to OARs of H&N for two beams was under 3%. Brain mean dose, brainstem, and optic chiasm max doses were, respectively, 7.5%–14.9%, 2.2%–8.1%, and 2.5%–19.0% lower for the 2.5 MV beam in the nasal cavity, orbit, and GBM plans. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the 2.5 MV beam can produce clinically relevant treatment plans, motivating future efforts for design of single‐energy LINACs. Such a machine will be capable of producing beams at this energy beneficial for low‐ and middle‐income countries, and investigations on dose enhancement from high‐Z nanoparticles. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797178 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97971782022-12-30 Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy Khaledi, Navid Hayes, Chris Belshaw, Louise Grattan, Mark Khan, Rao Gräfe, James L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: The shallow depth of maximum dose and higher dose fall‐off gradient of a 2.5 MV beam along the central axis that is available for imaging on linear accelerators is investigated for treatment of shallow tumors and sparing the organs at risk (OARs) beyond it. In addition, the 2.5 MV beam has an energy bridging the gap between kilo‐voltage (kV) and mega‐voltage (MV) beams for applications of dose enhancement with high atomic number (Z) nanoparticles. METHODS: We have commissioned and utilized a MATLAB‐based, open‐source treatment planning software (TPS), matRad, for intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose calculations. Treatment plans for prostate, liver, and head and neck (H&N), nasal cavity, two orbit cases, and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were performed and compared to a conventional 6 MV beam. Additional Monte Carlo calculations were also used for benchmarking the central axis dose. RESULTS: Both beams had similar planning target volume (PTV) dose coverage for all cases. However, the 2.5 MV beam deposited 6%–19% less integral doses to the nasal cavity, orbit, and GBM cases than 6 MV photons. The mean dose to the heart in the liver plan was 10.5% lower for 2.5 MV beam. The difference between the doses to OARs of H&N for two beams was under 3%. Brain mean dose, brainstem, and optic chiasm max doses were, respectively, 7.5%–14.9%, 2.2%–8.1%, and 2.5%–19.0% lower for the 2.5 MV beam in the nasal cavity, orbit, and GBM plans. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the 2.5 MV beam can produce clinically relevant treatment plans, motivating future efforts for design of single‐energy LINACs. Such a machine will be capable of producing beams at this energy beneficial for low‐ and middle‐income countries, and investigations on dose enhancement from high‐Z nanoparticles. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9797178/ /pubmed/36300870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13811 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Khaledi, Navid Hayes, Chris Belshaw, Louise Grattan, Mark Khan, Rao Gräfe, James L. Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title | Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title_full | Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title_short | Treatment planning with a 2.5 MV photon beam for radiation therapy |
title_sort | treatment planning with a 2.5 mv photon beam for radiation therapy |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797178/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36300870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khaledinavid treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy AT hayeschris treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy AT belshawlouise treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy AT grattanmark treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy AT khanrao treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy AT grafejamesl treatmentplanningwitha25mvphotonbeamforradiationtherapy |