Cargando…
Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United States
PURPOSE: There are no nationally representative data on oncologists’ use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate how oncologists in the United States use NGS tests to evaluate patients with cancer and to inform treatment recommendations....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society of Clinical Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00169 |
_version_ | 1784860651719491584 |
---|---|
author | Freedman, Andrew N. Klabunde, Carrie N. Wiant, Kristine Enewold, Lindsey Gray, Stacy W. Filipski, Kelly K. Keating, Nancy L. Leonard, Debra G.B. Lively, Tracy McNeel, Timothy S. Minasian, Lori Potosky, Arnold L. Rivera, Donna R. Schilsky, Richard L. Schrag, Deborah Simonds, Naoko I. Sineshaw, Helmneh M. Struewing, Jeffery P. Willis, Gordon de Moor, Janet S. |
author_facet | Freedman, Andrew N. Klabunde, Carrie N. Wiant, Kristine Enewold, Lindsey Gray, Stacy W. Filipski, Kelly K. Keating, Nancy L. Leonard, Debra G.B. Lively, Tracy McNeel, Timothy S. Minasian, Lori Potosky, Arnold L. Rivera, Donna R. Schilsky, Richard L. Schrag, Deborah Simonds, Naoko I. Sineshaw, Helmneh M. Struewing, Jeffery P. Willis, Gordon de Moor, Janet S. |
author_sort | Freedman, Andrew N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: There are no nationally representative data on oncologists’ use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate how oncologists in the United States use NGS tests to evaluate patients with cancer and to inform treatment recommendations. METHODS: The study used data from the National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment, which was mailed to a nationally representative sample of oncologists in 2017 (N = 1,281; cooperation rate = 38%). Weighted percentages were calculated to describe NGS test use. Multivariable modeling was conducted to assess the association of test use with oncologist practice characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 75.6% of oncologists reported using NGS tests to guide treatment decisions. Of these oncologists, 34.0% used them often to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced refractory disease, 29.1% to determine eligibility for clinical trials, and 17.5% to decide on off-label use of Food and Drug Administration–approved drugs. NGS test results informed treatment recommendations often for 26.8%, sometimes for 52.4%, and never or rarely for 20.8% of oncologists. Oncologists younger than 50 years of age, holding a faculty appointment, having genomics training, seeing more than 50 unique patients per month, and having access to a molecular tumor board were more likely to use NGS tests. CONCLUSION: In 2017, most oncologists in the United States were using NGS tests to guide treatment decisions for their patients. More research is needed to establish the clinical usefulness of these tests, to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for their use in practice, and to ensure that patients who can benefit from these new technologies receive appropriate testing and treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Society of Clinical Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97972412022-12-29 Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United States Freedman, Andrew N. Klabunde, Carrie N. Wiant, Kristine Enewold, Lindsey Gray, Stacy W. Filipski, Kelly K. Keating, Nancy L. Leonard, Debra G.B. Lively, Tracy McNeel, Timothy S. Minasian, Lori Potosky, Arnold L. Rivera, Donna R. Schilsky, Richard L. Schrag, Deborah Simonds, Naoko I. Sineshaw, Helmneh M. Struewing, Jeffery P. Willis, Gordon de Moor, Janet S. JCO Precis Oncol Original Report PURPOSE: There are no nationally representative data on oncologists’ use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in practice. The purpose of this study was to investigate how oncologists in the United States use NGS tests to evaluate patients with cancer and to inform treatment recommendations. METHODS: The study used data from the National Survey of Precision Medicine in Cancer Treatment, which was mailed to a nationally representative sample of oncologists in 2017 (N = 1,281; cooperation rate = 38%). Weighted percentages were calculated to describe NGS test use. Multivariable modeling was conducted to assess the association of test use with oncologist practice characteristics. RESULTS: Overall, 75.6% of oncologists reported using NGS tests to guide treatment decisions. Of these oncologists, 34.0% used them often to guide treatment decisions for patients with advanced refractory disease, 29.1% to determine eligibility for clinical trials, and 17.5% to decide on off-label use of Food and Drug Administration–approved drugs. NGS test results informed treatment recommendations often for 26.8%, sometimes for 52.4%, and never or rarely for 20.8% of oncologists. Oncologists younger than 50 years of age, holding a faculty appointment, having genomics training, seeing more than 50 unique patients per month, and having access to a molecular tumor board were more likely to use NGS tests. CONCLUSION: In 2017, most oncologists in the United States were using NGS tests to guide treatment decisions for their patients. More research is needed to establish the clinical usefulness of these tests, to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines for their use in practice, and to ensure that patients who can benefit from these new technologies receive appropriate testing and treatment. American Society of Clinical Oncology 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9797241/ /pubmed/35135159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00169 Text en © 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Report Freedman, Andrew N. Klabunde, Carrie N. Wiant, Kristine Enewold, Lindsey Gray, Stacy W. Filipski, Kelly K. Keating, Nancy L. Leonard, Debra G.B. Lively, Tracy McNeel, Timothy S. Minasian, Lori Potosky, Arnold L. Rivera, Donna R. Schilsky, Richard L. Schrag, Deborah Simonds, Naoko I. Sineshaw, Helmneh M. Struewing, Jeffery P. Willis, Gordon de Moor, Janet S. Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment: Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United States |
title | Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment:
Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United
States |
title_full | Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment:
Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United
States |
title_fullStr | Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment:
Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United
States |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment:
Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United
States |
title_short | Use of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests to Guide Cancer Treatment:
Results From a Nationally Representative Survey of Oncologists in the United
States |
title_sort | use of next-generation sequencing tests to guide cancer treatment:
results from a nationally representative survey of oncologists in the united
states |
topic | Original Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.18.00169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freedmanandrewn useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT klabundecarrien useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT wiantkristine useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT enewoldlindsey useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT graystacyw useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT filipskikellyk useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT keatingnancyl useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT leonarddebragb useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT livelytracy useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT mcneeltimothys useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT minasianlori useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT potoskyarnoldl useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT riveradonnar useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT schilskyrichardl useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT schragdeborah useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT simondsnaokoi useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT sineshawhelmnehm useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT struewingjefferyp useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT willisgordon useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates AT demoorjanets useofnextgenerationsequencingteststoguidecancertreatmentresultsfromanationallyrepresentativesurveyofoncologistsintheunitedstates |