Cargando…

Quantitative Assessment of Apically Extruded Debris after Single-Files Supplemental Retreatment considering Apical Patency Influence: In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of re-establishing apical patency on the quantity of debris extruded through the apex after three supplementary retreatment files (TruNatomy (TRN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and XP endo Finisher R (XPFR)). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty single-rooted mandibul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shaheen, Neveen Ali, Elhelbawy, Nahla Gamaleldin, Sherif, Dalia Abdelhamid
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Hindawi 2022
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7544813

Ejemplares similares

Impact of different file systems on the amount of apically extruded debris during endodontic retreatment
por: Uzunoglu, Emel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris During Retreatment Procedures Using Various File Systems in Teeth With Simulated Apical Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study
por: Gayatri, Sasti, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Apical extrusion of debris by supplementary files used for retreatment: An ex vivo comparative study
por: Pawar, Ajinkya M., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris
por: Altunbas, Demet, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Comparison of the amount of apical debris extrusion associated with different retreatment systems and supplementary file application during retreatment process
por: Çiçek, Ersan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Cleaning Efficiency of the Pediatric Rotary File System and the Manual Nickel-Titanium File System
por: Habib, Abrar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Regaining Apical Patency with Manual and Reciprocating Instrumentation during Retreatment
por: Trierveiler Paiva, Rafaela Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris with V-Taper, ProTaper Next, and the Self-adjusting File systems
por: Vyavahare, Nishant K., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Debris Apically Extruded by Two Reciprocating Systems: A Comparative Quantitative Study
por: Amaral, Andressa Pinho, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Retreatment Using ProTaper Next and Reciproc in Severely Curved Canals
por: Nevares, Giselle, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris in Root Canals prepared by Single-file Reciprocating and Single File Rotary Instrumentation Systems: A Comparative In vitro Study
por: Sinha, Sonal, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Quantitative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Biomechanical Preparation using Hand K-File, Protaper Next, and Waveone – An In Vitro Study
por: Maheswari, Diksha, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

In vitro evaluation of filling material removal and apical debris extrusion after retreatment using Reciproc blue, Hyflex EDM and ProTaper retreatment files
por: Abdelnaby, Passent, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A Comparative Evaluation of the Apically Extruded Debris from Root Canals Prepared by R-Motion NiTi File System
por: Al-Saffar, Farah B., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Influence of Different Irrigation Solutions and Instrumentation Techniques on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris
por: Silveira, Camila Maia Maggi, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Effect of different chelating agents and their surface tension on the amount of apically extruded debris
por: Gokturk, Hakan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Effect of Patency Files on Apical Canal Anatomy Using SEM Imaging
por: Cavender, Michael S., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparison of full rotation and reciprocating movements in regaining apical patency during endodontic retreatment
por: Nouri, Hadi, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
por: UEZU, Mary Kinue Nakamune, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris using three different thermomechanically heat treated file systems with two different motions: An in vitro study
por: Sowjanya, Thangi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system
por: Al Omari, Taher M. N., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation using two Ni-Ti single file rotary systems: An in vitro study
por: Singbal, Kiran, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris using TRUShape, TruNatomy, and WaveOne Gold in curved canals
por: Roshdy, Nehal Nabil, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems
por: Ozsu, Damla, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Shaping Ability and Buckling Resistance of TruNatomy, WaveOne gold, and XP-Endo Shaper Single-File Systems
por: Shaheen, Neveen Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study
por: Nanavati, Komal, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The influence of ProTaper and WaveOne on apically extruded debris: A systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Zhang, Chen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Influence of File Motion on Shaping, Apical Debris Extrusion and Dentinal Defects: A Critical Review
por: Pedrinha, Victor Feliz, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of Apical Extrusion of Debris by Using Single-File, Full-Sequence Rotary and Reciprocating Systems
por: Ehsani, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments
por: Soi, Sonal, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

An In vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris Using Reciproc, ProTaper Universal, Neolix and Hyflex in Curved Canals
por: Labbaf, Hossein, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Apically Extruded Debris following Programmed Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments
por: Yammine, Salwa Daoud, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Influence of pecking frequency at working length on the volume of apically extruded debris: A micro-computed tomography analysis
por: Wang, Li-Xiao, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comparison of apically extruded debris associated with several nickel-titanium systems after determining working length by apex locator
por: Çiçek, Ersan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
por: Yılmaz Çırakoglu, Neslihan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of root canal curvature and instrument type on the amount of extruded debris during retreatment
por: Serefoglu, Burcu, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Jody Rosenblatt: To extrude apically or basally, that is the question
por: Sedwick, Caitlin
Publicado: (2013)

Comparative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation using ProTaper™, Hyflex™ and Waveone™ rotary systems
por: Surakanti, Jayaprada Reddy, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Influence of maintaining apical patency in post-endodontic pain
por: Shubham, Snigdha, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Apical Debris Extrusion with Conventional Rotary and Reciprocating Instruments
por: Eshagh Saberi, Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_9qrl3p84hj7hn5gdtnhslfl6ed