Cargando…

Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of maternal pertussis vaccination based on randomized clinical trials. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan Fang Database were searched from inception up to the 8th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simayi, Aidibai, Zhu, Liguo, Jin, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4857872
_version_ 1784860665594249216
author Simayi, Aidibai
Zhu, Liguo
Jin, Hui
author_facet Simayi, Aidibai
Zhu, Liguo
Jin, Hui
author_sort Simayi, Aidibai
collection PubMed
description The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of maternal pertussis vaccination based on randomized clinical trials. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan Fang Database were searched from inception up to the 8th of October 2021, using a protocol registered on PROSPERO with no. 42021287717, and a meta-analysis was conducted. We measured pooled geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for IgG antibodies against pertussis and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We identified a total of 522 publications, and after a strict screening, we found that 6 RCTs were eligible for our meta-analysis. GMCs were determined with a standardized mean difference (SMD), and the pooled SMD of anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRN IgG from cord blood were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.24), 1.03 (95% CI: (0.70, 1.35)), and 1.55(95% CI: 1.22, 1.88), respectively. The pooled OR of SAEs of women and infants did not show a statistical difference; the pooled ORs were 1.26 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.05); P = 0.35) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.01); p = 0.053), respectively. Infants of immunized women have significantly higher transplacental antibodies for protection against pertussis disease during the first 2 months of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97973142022-12-29 Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Simayi, Aidibai Zhu, Liguo Jin, Hui J Trop Med Review Article The objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of maternal pertussis vaccination based on randomized clinical trials. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Internet, and Wan Fang Database were searched from inception up to the 8th of October 2021, using a protocol registered on PROSPERO with no. 42021287717, and a meta-analysis was conducted. We measured pooled geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for IgG antibodies against pertussis and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs). We identified a total of 522 publications, and after a strict screening, we found that 6 RCTs were eligible for our meta-analysis. GMCs were determined with a standardized mean difference (SMD), and the pooled SMD of anti-PT, anti-FHA, and anti-PRN IgG from cord blood were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.24), 1.03 (95% CI: (0.70, 1.35)), and 1.55(95% CI: 1.22, 1.88), respectively. The pooled OR of SAEs of women and infants did not show a statistical difference; the pooled ORs were 1.26 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.05); P = 0.35) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.37, 1.01); p = 0.053), respectively. Infants of immunized women have significantly higher transplacental antibodies for protection against pertussis disease during the first 2 months of life. Hindawi 2022-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9797314/ /pubmed/36588977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4857872 Text en Copyright © 2022 Aidibai Simayi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Simayi, Aidibai
Zhu, Liguo
Jin, Hui
Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_fullStr Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_short Safety and Immunogenicity of Pertussis Vaccine Immunization during Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
title_sort safety and immunogenicity of pertussis vaccine immunization during pregnancy: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36588977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4857872
work_keys_str_mv AT simayiaidibai safetyandimmunogenicityofpertussisvaccineimmunizationduringpregnancyametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT zhuliguo safetyandimmunogenicityofpertussisvaccineimmunizationduringpregnancyametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials
AT jinhui safetyandimmunogenicityofpertussisvaccineimmunizationduringpregnancyametaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrials