Cargando…

Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) had a considerable impact on intensive care utilization and resource optimization. Multiple modalities for respiratory support were implemented d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alamami, Ans, Imaduddeen, Tahir, Ibrahim, Ezzedi A, Ibrahim, Abdusalam S, Raza, Tasleem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31991
_version_ 1784860750522613760
author Alamami, Ans
Imaduddeen, Tahir
Ibrahim, Ezzedi A
Ibrahim, Abdusalam S
Raza, Tasleem
author_facet Alamami, Ans
Imaduddeen, Tahir
Ibrahim, Ezzedi A
Ibrahim, Abdusalam S
Raza, Tasleem
author_sort Alamami, Ans
collection PubMed
description Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) had a considerable impact on intensive care utilization and resource optimization. Multiple modalities for respiratory support were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic with the main concern of being able to identify those patients at high risk of rapidly progressive respiratory failure, whom the early initiation of invasive respiratory support would, in particular, affect the outcome in comparison to the noninvasive management strategy. Objectives In our cohort study, we describe demographic characteristics, respiratory support modalities, and their relation to patient outcomes. Method Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to a tertiary center COVID-19-dedicated medical intensive care unit (MICU) in Qatar between March 2020 and May 2020 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia were included in this study. Patients were divided into invasive or noninvasive, and those who required invasive strategy were subdivided into the early intubation group (patients who were intubated within 72 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission) and the late intubation group (patients who were intubated after 72 hours from ICU admission). The primary outcome was ICU and hospital mortality, and the secondary effects were the length of stay and mortality determinants. Results A total of 686 patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) during the study period. There were 222 (32.4%), 131 (19.1%), and 333 (48.5%) patients in the early, late, and not intubated groups, respectively. Compared to the late intubated group, the early intubated group had a higher proportion of males. Diabetes (39.8%) was the most common comorbidity, followed by hypertension (HTN) (36%) and heart disease (9.8%). The 30-day ICU and hospital mortality were significantly higher in the late intubated group compared to the early intubated group (30.5% versus 15.8%, and 30% versus 16.2%). The median ICU and hospital stay days in the total sample were 8 (interquartile range (IQR): 5-14) and 19 (IQR: 14-25), respectively. The mean estimates of 30-day ICU survival times for early intubated, late intubated, and not intubated groups were 25.14 (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.71, 26.57), 23.35 (95% CI: 21.63, 25.07), and 29.91 (95% CI: 29.74, 30.09) respectively. Conclusions In our study, the COVID-19 ARDS patients who required early invasive ventilatory support and in whom the physiological parameter was more severe (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores) had a better outcome than the late intubation group. Age more than 60 years old, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic liver disease (CLD) were the main predictor of mortality in total.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9797753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97977532022-12-29 Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study Alamami, Ans Imaduddeen, Tahir Ibrahim, Ezzedi A Ibrahim, Abdusalam S Raza, Tasleem Cureus Anesthesiology Introduction Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-induced acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) had a considerable impact on intensive care utilization and resource optimization. Multiple modalities for respiratory support were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic with the main concern of being able to identify those patients at high risk of rapidly progressive respiratory failure, whom the early initiation of invasive respiratory support would, in particular, affect the outcome in comparison to the noninvasive management strategy. Objectives In our cohort study, we describe demographic characteristics, respiratory support modalities, and their relation to patient outcomes. Method Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to a tertiary center COVID-19-dedicated medical intensive care unit (MICU) in Qatar between March 2020 and May 2020 with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia were included in this study. Patients were divided into invasive or noninvasive, and those who required invasive strategy were subdivided into the early intubation group (patients who were intubated within 72 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) admission) and the late intubation group (patients who were intubated after 72 hours from ICU admission). The primary outcome was ICU and hospital mortality, and the secondary effects were the length of stay and mortality determinants. Results A total of 686 patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) during the study period. There were 222 (32.4%), 131 (19.1%), and 333 (48.5%) patients in the early, late, and not intubated groups, respectively. Compared to the late intubated group, the early intubated group had a higher proportion of males. Diabetes (39.8%) was the most common comorbidity, followed by hypertension (HTN) (36%) and heart disease (9.8%). The 30-day ICU and hospital mortality were significantly higher in the late intubated group compared to the early intubated group (30.5% versus 15.8%, and 30% versus 16.2%). The median ICU and hospital stay days in the total sample were 8 (interquartile range (IQR): 5-14) and 19 (IQR: 14-25), respectively. The mean estimates of 30-day ICU survival times for early intubated, late intubated, and not intubated groups were 25.14 (95% confidence interval (CI): 23.71, 26.57), 23.35 (95% CI: 21.63, 25.07), and 29.91 (95% CI: 29.74, 30.09) respectively. Conclusions In our study, the COVID-19 ARDS patients who required early invasive ventilatory support and in whom the physiological parameter was more severe (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores) had a better outcome than the late intubation group. Age more than 60 years old, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and chronic liver disease (CLD) were the main predictor of mortality in total. Cureus 2022-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9797753/ /pubmed/36589198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31991 Text en Copyright © 2022, Alamami et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Alamami, Ans
Imaduddeen, Tahir
Ibrahim, Ezzedi A
Ibrahim, Abdusalam S
Raza, Tasleem
Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Three Different Respiratory Support Modalities: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort clinical outcomes of covid-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with three different respiratory support modalities: a retrospective cohort study
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31991
work_keys_str_mv AT alamamians clinicaloutcomesofcovid19inducedacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinpatientswiththreedifferentrespiratorysupportmodalitiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT imaduddeentahir clinicaloutcomesofcovid19inducedacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinpatientswiththreedifferentrespiratorysupportmodalitiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ibrahimezzedia clinicaloutcomesofcovid19inducedacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinpatientswiththreedifferentrespiratorysupportmodalitiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT ibrahimabdusalams clinicaloutcomesofcovid19inducedacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinpatientswiththreedifferentrespiratorysupportmodalitiesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT razatasleem clinicaloutcomesofcovid19inducedacuterespiratorydistresssyndromeinpatientswiththreedifferentrespiratorysupportmodalitiesaretrospectivecohortstudy