Cargando…
Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports
We aimed to identify the causes of inconsistent results between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive testing methods for trisomy 21. In the first case, NIPT was performed at 11 weeks of pregnancy, and the result showed a high risk of trisomy 21 [fetal fraction (FF) = 6.98%, 21 chromosom...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1063480 |
_version_ | 1784860805783617536 |
---|---|
author | Kang, Kyung Min Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyunjin Jang, Hee Yeon Go, Minyeon Yang, So Hyun Ryu, Sang Woo Bae, Sung Mi Cha, Dong Hyun Shim, Sung Han |
author_facet | Kang, Kyung Min Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyunjin Jang, Hee Yeon Go, Minyeon Yang, So Hyun Ryu, Sang Woo Bae, Sung Mi Cha, Dong Hyun Shim, Sung Han |
author_sort | Kang, Kyung Min |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to identify the causes of inconsistent results between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive testing methods for trisomy 21. In the first case, NIPT was performed at 11 weeks of pregnancy, and the result showed a high risk of trisomy 21 [fetal fraction (FF) = 6.98%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 3.6]. The patient underwent quantitative fluorescent (QF)-PCR and karyotyping at 14 + 0 weeks of pregnancy through CVS showing mosaicism of 47, XX, + 21[11] and 46, XX [39] in karyotyping. The patient underwent amniocentesis at 15 + 6 weeks, showing a normal pattern in QF-PCR and 46, XX karyotyping in long term culture. The second case underwent NIPT at 16 + 5 weeks of pregnancy (FF = 7.52%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 2.503). She underwent an invasive test at 19 weeks through amniotic fluid sampling. As a result, trisomy 21 was detected by QF-PCR, and mosaicism of XX, +21[22]/46, XX [4] was identified by karyotyping. Despite significant advances in fetal chromosome analysis using NIPT, invasive testing is still needed as placenta-derived DNA does not reflect 100% fetal genetic information. Placental mosaicism can be detected by NIPT, but more research is needed to increase its sensitivity. Therefore, if the NIPT result is positive, an invasive test can confirm the result, and continuous monitoring is required even if the NIPT result is negative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9797983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97979832022-12-30 Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports Kang, Kyung Min Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyunjin Jang, Hee Yeon Go, Minyeon Yang, So Hyun Ryu, Sang Woo Bae, Sung Mi Cha, Dong Hyun Shim, Sung Han Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine We aimed to identify the causes of inconsistent results between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive testing methods for trisomy 21. In the first case, NIPT was performed at 11 weeks of pregnancy, and the result showed a high risk of trisomy 21 [fetal fraction (FF) = 6.98%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 3.6]. The patient underwent quantitative fluorescent (QF)-PCR and karyotyping at 14 + 0 weeks of pregnancy through CVS showing mosaicism of 47, XX, + 21[11] and 46, XX [39] in karyotyping. The patient underwent amniocentesis at 15 + 6 weeks, showing a normal pattern in QF-PCR and 46, XX karyotyping in long term culture. The second case underwent NIPT at 16 + 5 weeks of pregnancy (FF = 7.52%, 21 chromosome Z-score = 2.503). She underwent an invasive test at 19 weeks through amniotic fluid sampling. As a result, trisomy 21 was detected by QF-PCR, and mosaicism of XX, +21[22]/46, XX [4] was identified by karyotyping. Despite significant advances in fetal chromosome analysis using NIPT, invasive testing is still needed as placenta-derived DNA does not reflect 100% fetal genetic information. Placental mosaicism can be detected by NIPT, but more research is needed to increase its sensitivity. Therefore, if the NIPT result is positive, an invasive test can confirm the result, and continuous monitoring is required even if the NIPT result is negative. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9797983/ /pubmed/36590946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1063480 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kang, Kim, Park, Kim, Jang, Go, Yang, Ryu, Bae, Cha and Shim. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Kang, Kyung Min Kim, Soo Hyun Park, Ji Eun Kim, Hyunjin Jang, Hee Yeon Go, Minyeon Yang, So Hyun Ryu, Sang Woo Bae, Sung Mi Cha, Dong Hyun Shim, Sung Han Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title | Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title_full | Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title_fullStr | Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title_full_unstemmed | Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title_short | Inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: Two case reports |
title_sort | inconsistency between non-invasive prenatal testing (nipt) and conventional prenatal diagnosis due to confined placental and fetal mosaicism: two case reports |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9797983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.1063480 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kangkyungmin inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT kimsoohyun inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT parkjieun inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT kimhyunjin inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT jangheeyeon inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT gominyeon inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT yangsohyun inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT ryusangwoo inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT baesungmi inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT chadonghyun inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports AT shimsunghan inconsistencybetweennoninvasiveprenataltestingniptandconventionalprenataldiagnosisduetoconfinedplacentalandfetalmosaicismtwocasereports |