Cargando…

Myositis in Germany: epidemiological insights over 15 years from 2005 to 2019

BACKGROUND: The medical care of patients with myositis is a great challenge in clinical practice. This is due to the rarity of these disease, the complexity of diagnosis and management as well as the lack of systematic analyses. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the aim of this project was to obtain an overvie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawlitzki, Marc, Acar, Laura, Masanneck, Lars, Willison, Alice, Regner-Nelke, Liesa, Nelke, Christopher, L’hoest, Helmut, Marschall, Ursula, Schmidt, Jens, Meuth, Sven G., Ruck, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00226-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The medical care of patients with myositis is a great challenge in clinical practice. This is due to the rarity of these disease, the complexity of diagnosis and management as well as the lack of systematic analyses. OBJECTIVES: Therefore, the aim of this project was to obtain an overview of the current care of myositis patients in Germany and to evaluate epidemiological trends in recent years. METHODS: In collaboration with BARMER Insurance, retrospective analysis of outpatient and inpatient data from an average of approximately 8.7 million insured patients between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed using ICD-10 codes for myositis for identification of relevant data. In addition, a comparative analysis was performed between myositis patients and an age-matched comparison group from other populations insured by BARMER. RESULTS: 45,800 BARMER-insured individuals received a diagnosis of myositis during the observation period, with a relatively stable prevalence throughout. With regard to comorbidities, a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular disease as well as neoplasm was observed compared to the control group within the BARMER-insured population. In addition, myositis patients suffer more frequently from psychiatric disorders, such as depression and somatoform disorders. However, the ICD-10 catalogue only includes the specific coding of “dermatomyositis” and “polymyositis” and thus does not allow for a sufficient analysis of all idiopathic inflammatory myopathies subtypes. CONCLUSION: The current data provide a comprehensive epidemiological analysis of myositis in Germany, highlighting the multimorbidity of myositis patients. This underlines the need for multidisciplinary management. However, the ICD-10 codes currently still in use do not allow for specific analysis of the subtypes of myositis. The upcoming ICD-11 coding may improve future analyses in this regard.