Cargando…

Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community

BACKGROUND: Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)–vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community‐based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spetko, Nicholas, Rong, Jian, Larson, Martin G., Haidar, Michael, Raber, Inbar, Peters, Kevin, Benjamin, Emelia J., O'Donnell, Christopher J., Manning, Warren J., Vasan, Ramachandran S., Mitchell, Gary F., Tsao, Connie W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027230
_version_ 1784860983150247936
author Spetko, Nicholas
Rong, Jian
Larson, Martin G.
Haidar, Michael
Raber, Inbar
Peters, Kevin
Benjamin, Emelia J.
O'Donnell, Christopher J.
Manning, Warren J.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Mitchell, Gary F.
Tsao, Connie W.
author_facet Spetko, Nicholas
Rong, Jian
Larson, Martin G.
Haidar, Michael
Raber, Inbar
Peters, Kevin
Benjamin, Emelia J.
O'Donnell, Christopher J.
Manning, Warren J.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Mitchell, Gary F.
Tsao, Connie W.
author_sort Spetko, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)–vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community‐based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and several clinical measures of LV diastolic mechanics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Framingham Heart Study Offspring adults (n=1502 participants, mean 67±9 years, 54% women) with available 1.5T CMR and transthoracic echocardiographic measures were included. Measures included proximal descending aortic strain and aortic arch pulse wave velocity by CMR (2002–2006) and diastolic function (mitral Doppler E and A wave velocity, E wave area, and LV tissue Doppler e' velocity) by echocardiography (2005–2008). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to relate CMR aortic stiffness measures to measures of echocardiographic LV diastolic function. All continuous variables were standardized. In multivariable‐adjusted regression analyses, aortic strain was inversely associated with E wave deceleration time (estimated β=−0.10±0.032, P=0.001), whereas aortic arch pulse wave velocity was inversely associated with E/A ratio (estimated β=−0.094±0.027, P=0.0006), E wave area (estimated β=−0.070±0.027, P=0.010), and e' (estimated β=−0.061±0.027, P=0.022), all indicating associations of higher aortic stiffness by CMR with less favorable LV diastolic function. Compared with men, women had a larger inverse relationship between pulse wave velocity and E/A ratio (interaction β=−0.085±0.031, P=0.0064). There was no significant effect modification by age or a U‐shaped (quadratic) relation between aortic stiffness and LV diastolic function measures. CONCLUSIONS: Higher proximal aortic stiffness is associated with less favorable LV diastolic function. Future studies may clarify temporal relations of aortic stiffness with varying patterns and progression of LV diastolic dysfunction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9798804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97988042023-01-05 Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community Spetko, Nicholas Rong, Jian Larson, Martin G. Haidar, Michael Raber, Inbar Peters, Kevin Benjamin, Emelia J. O'Donnell, Christopher J. Manning, Warren J. Vasan, Ramachandran S. Mitchell, Gary F. Tsao, Connie W. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Stiffness of the proximal aorta may play a critical role in adverse left ventricular (LV)–vascular interactions and associated LV diastolic dysfunction. In a community‐based sample, we sought to determine the association between proximal aortic stiffness measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and several clinical measures of LV diastolic mechanics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Framingham Heart Study Offspring adults (n=1502 participants, mean 67±9 years, 54% women) with available 1.5T CMR and transthoracic echocardiographic measures were included. Measures included proximal descending aortic strain and aortic arch pulse wave velocity by CMR (2002–2006) and diastolic function (mitral Doppler E and A wave velocity, E wave area, and LV tissue Doppler e' velocity) by echocardiography (2005–2008). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to relate CMR aortic stiffness measures to measures of echocardiographic LV diastolic function. All continuous variables were standardized. In multivariable‐adjusted regression analyses, aortic strain was inversely associated with E wave deceleration time (estimated β=−0.10±0.032, P=0.001), whereas aortic arch pulse wave velocity was inversely associated with E/A ratio (estimated β=−0.094±0.027, P=0.0006), E wave area (estimated β=−0.070±0.027, P=0.010), and e' (estimated β=−0.061±0.027, P=0.022), all indicating associations of higher aortic stiffness by CMR with less favorable LV diastolic function. Compared with men, women had a larger inverse relationship between pulse wave velocity and E/A ratio (interaction β=−0.085±0.031, P=0.0064). There was no significant effect modification by age or a U‐shaped (quadratic) relation between aortic stiffness and LV diastolic function measures. CONCLUSIONS: Higher proximal aortic stiffness is associated with less favorable LV diastolic function. Future studies may clarify temporal relations of aortic stiffness with varying patterns and progression of LV diastolic dysfunction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9798804/ /pubmed/36533620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027230 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Spetko, Nicholas
Rong, Jian
Larson, Martin G.
Haidar, Michael
Raber, Inbar
Peters, Kevin
Benjamin, Emelia J.
O'Donnell, Christopher J.
Manning, Warren J.
Vasan, Ramachandran S.
Mitchell, Gary F.
Tsao, Connie W.
Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title_full Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title_fullStr Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title_full_unstemmed Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title_short Cross‐Sectional Relationships of Proximal Aortic Stiffness and Left Ventricular Diastolic Function in Adults in the Community
title_sort cross‐sectional relationships of proximal aortic stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function in adults in the community
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9798804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36533620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.027230
work_keys_str_mv AT spetkonicholas crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT rongjian crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT larsonmarting crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT haidarmichael crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT raberinbar crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT peterskevin crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT benjaminemeliaj crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT odonnellchristopherj crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT manningwarrenj crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT vasanramachandrans crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT mitchellgaryf crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity
AT tsaoconniew crosssectionalrelationshipsofproximalaorticstiffnessandleftventriculardiastolicfunctioninadultsinthecommunity