Cargando…

Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study

BACKGROUND: Current regulations of anaesthesiology training programmes may affect gender equity, female representation and leadership. OBJECTIVE: To describe the work regulations of anaesthesiology training programs and working conditions during the early period of child-rearing in European countrie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berger-Estilita, Joana, Leitl, Jacqueline, Vacas, Susana, Neskovic, Vojislava, Stüber, Frank, Zdravkovic, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36503934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001787
_version_ 1784861034621698048
author Berger-Estilita, Joana
Leitl, Jacqueline
Vacas, Susana
Neskovic, Vojislava
Stüber, Frank
Zdravkovic, Marko
author_facet Berger-Estilita, Joana
Leitl, Jacqueline
Vacas, Susana
Neskovic, Vojislava
Stüber, Frank
Zdravkovic, Marko
author_sort Berger-Estilita, Joana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current regulations of anaesthesiology training programmes may affect gender equity, female representation and leadership. OBJECTIVE: To describe the work regulations of anaesthesiology training programs and working conditions during the early period of child-rearing in European countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: National Anesthesiologists Societies Committee (NASC) representatives of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight NASC representatives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Basic specialist training working conditions, gender-related data, return to work after childbirth and workplace policies against discrimination during anaesthesiology specialist training. INTERVENTION(S): A 48-item questionnaire to explore the work patterns and conditions for trainees especially for new parents, professional development opportunities and work discrimination regulations in each representative country was distributed to NASC representatives of 44 European countries. RESULTS: We collected the replies of each representative (38 representatives from 44 invited countries’ representatives, 86% response rate). The median [IQR] proportion of female trainees was 60% [50 to 68]. There were no reported pay differences between sexes. In eight European countries, pregnant trainees worked fewer hours and were excused from night shifts. Women could not be laid off during pregnancy in all 38 countries (100%). The countries offered a median of 18 weeks of paid (total or partial) maternity leave (range, 13 to 60 weeks). Most countries (89%) accommodate paid paternity leaves. A significant proportion of parental leave was unpaid (n=18, 42%). Twenty-one (55%) countries allowed part-time work after delivery. The UK was the only country with clear recommendations to formally complain after harassment. CONCLUSION: European countries have a wide variety of regulations. On paper, numerous countries have various paid maternal, paternal and parental leave; however, it remains to be determined if such leave takes place in practice. The practical consequences of these regulations on female trainees during the child-rearing period need to be explored further. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9799042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97990422023-01-04 Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study Berger-Estilita, Joana Leitl, Jacqueline Vacas, Susana Neskovic, Vojislava Stüber, Frank Zdravkovic, Marko Eur J Anaesthesiol Patient Safety-Education BACKGROUND: Current regulations of anaesthesiology training programmes may affect gender equity, female representation and leadership. OBJECTIVE: To describe the work regulations of anaesthesiology training programs and working conditions during the early period of child-rearing in European countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: National Anesthesiologists Societies Committee (NASC) representatives of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight NASC representatives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Basic specialist training working conditions, gender-related data, return to work after childbirth and workplace policies against discrimination during anaesthesiology specialist training. INTERVENTION(S): A 48-item questionnaire to explore the work patterns and conditions for trainees especially for new parents, professional development opportunities and work discrimination regulations in each representative country was distributed to NASC representatives of 44 European countries. RESULTS: We collected the replies of each representative (38 representatives from 44 invited countries’ representatives, 86% response rate). The median [IQR] proportion of female trainees was 60% [50 to 68]. There were no reported pay differences between sexes. In eight European countries, pregnant trainees worked fewer hours and were excused from night shifts. Women could not be laid off during pregnancy in all 38 countries (100%). The countries offered a median of 18 weeks of paid (total or partial) maternity leave (range, 13 to 60 weeks). Most countries (89%) accommodate paid paternity leaves. A significant proportion of parental leave was unpaid (n=18, 42%). Twenty-one (55%) countries allowed part-time work after delivery. The UK was the only country with clear recommendations to formally complain after harassment. CONCLUSION: European countries have a wide variety of regulations. On paper, numerous countries have various paid maternal, paternal and parental leave; however, it remains to be determined if such leave takes place in practice. The practical consequences of these regulations on female trainees during the child-rearing period need to be explored further. TRIAL REGISTRATION: None Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-02 2022-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9799042/ /pubmed/36503934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001787 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Patient Safety-Education
Berger-Estilita, Joana
Leitl, Jacqueline
Vacas, Susana
Neskovic, Vojislava
Stüber, Frank
Zdravkovic, Marko
Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title_full Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title_fullStr Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title_full_unstemmed Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title_short Welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in Europe: A descriptive cross-sectional survey study
title_sort welfare practices for anaesthesiology trainees in europe: a descriptive cross-sectional survey study
topic Patient Safety-Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36503934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001787
work_keys_str_mv AT bergerestilitajoana welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT leitljacqueline welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT vacassusana welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT neskovicvojislava welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT stuberfrank welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy
AT zdravkovicmarko welfarepracticesforanaesthesiologytraineesineuropeadescriptivecrosssectionalsurveystudy