Cargando…
Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls
INTRODUCTION: Many studies have attempted to link multifidus (MF) fat infiltration with muscle quality and chronic low back pain (cLBP), but there is no consensus on these relationships. METHODS: In this cross‐sectional cohort study, 39 cLBP patients and 18 asymptomatic controls were included. The M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1217 |
_version_ | 1784861040620601344 |
---|---|
author | Ballatori, Alexander M. Shahrestani, Shane Nyayapati, Priya Agarwal, Vibhu Krug, Roland Han, Misung Fields, Aaron J. O'Neill, Conor Demir‐Deviren, Sibel Lotz, Jeffrey C. Bailey, Jeannie F. |
author_facet | Ballatori, Alexander M. Shahrestani, Shane Nyayapati, Priya Agarwal, Vibhu Krug, Roland Han, Misung Fields, Aaron J. O'Neill, Conor Demir‐Deviren, Sibel Lotz, Jeffrey C. Bailey, Jeannie F. |
author_sort | Ballatori, Alexander M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Many studies have attempted to link multifidus (MF) fat infiltration with muscle quality and chronic low back pain (cLBP), but there is no consensus on these relationships. METHODS: In this cross‐sectional cohort study, 39 cLBP patients and 18 asymptomatic controls were included. The MF muscle was manually segmented at each lumbar disc level and fat fraction (FF) measurements were taken from the corresponding advanced imaging water‐fat images. We assessed the distribution patterns of MF fat from L1L2 to L5S1 and compared these patterns between groups. The sample was stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), subject‐reported pain intensity (VAS), and subject‐reported low back pain disability (oswestry disability index, ODI). RESULTS: Older patients had significantly different MF FF distribution patterns compared to older controls (p < 0.0001). Male patients had 34.8% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to male controls (p = 0.0006), significantly different MF FF distribution patterns (p = 0.028), 53.7% higher mean MF FF measurements at L2L3 (p = 0.037), and 50.6% higher mean MF FF measurements at L3L4 (p = 0.041). Low BMI patients had 29.7% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to low BMI controls (p = 0.0077). High BMI patients only had 4% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to high BMI controls (p = 0.7933). However, high BMI patients had significantly different MF FF distribution patterns compared to high BMI controls (p = 0.0324). Low VAS patients did not significantly differ from the control cohort for any of our outcomes of interest; however, high VAS patients had 24.3% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF values (p = 0.0011), significantly different MF FF distribution patterns (p < 0.0001), 34.7% higher mean MF FF at L2L3 (p = 0.040), and 34.6% higher mean MF FF at L3L4 (p = 0.040) compared to the control cohort. Similar trends were observed for ODI. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that when the presence of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration is not characteristic of an individual's age, sex, and BMI, it may be associated with lower back pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9799081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97990812023-01-03 Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls Ballatori, Alexander M. Shahrestani, Shane Nyayapati, Priya Agarwal, Vibhu Krug, Roland Han, Misung Fields, Aaron J. O'Neill, Conor Demir‐Deviren, Sibel Lotz, Jeffrey C. Bailey, Jeannie F. JOR Spine Research Articles INTRODUCTION: Many studies have attempted to link multifidus (MF) fat infiltration with muscle quality and chronic low back pain (cLBP), but there is no consensus on these relationships. METHODS: In this cross‐sectional cohort study, 39 cLBP patients and 18 asymptomatic controls were included. The MF muscle was manually segmented at each lumbar disc level and fat fraction (FF) measurements were taken from the corresponding advanced imaging water‐fat images. We assessed the distribution patterns of MF fat from L1L2 to L5S1 and compared these patterns between groups. The sample was stratified by age, sex, body mass index (BMI), subject‐reported pain intensity (VAS), and subject‐reported low back pain disability (oswestry disability index, ODI). RESULTS: Older patients had significantly different MF FF distribution patterns compared to older controls (p < 0.0001). Male patients had 34.8% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to male controls (p = 0.0006), significantly different MF FF distribution patterns (p = 0.028), 53.7% higher mean MF FF measurements at L2L3 (p = 0.037), and 50.6% higher mean MF FF measurements at L3L4 (p = 0.041). Low BMI patients had 29.7% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to low BMI controls (p = 0.0077). High BMI patients only had 4% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF compared to high BMI controls (p = 0.7933). However, high BMI patients had significantly different MF FF distribution patterns compared to high BMI controls (p = 0.0324). Low VAS patients did not significantly differ from the control cohort for any of our outcomes of interest; however, high VAS patients had 24.3% higher mean lumbar spine MF FF values (p = 0.0011), significantly different MF FF distribution patterns (p < 0.0001), 34.7% higher mean MF FF at L2L3 (p = 0.040), and 34.6% higher mean MF FF at L3L4 (p = 0.040) compared to the control cohort. Similar trends were observed for ODI. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that when the presence of paraspinal muscle fat infiltration is not characteristic of an individual's age, sex, and BMI, it may be associated with lower back pain. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9799081/ /pubmed/36601370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1217 Text en © 2022 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Ballatori, Alexander M. Shahrestani, Shane Nyayapati, Priya Agarwal, Vibhu Krug, Roland Han, Misung Fields, Aaron J. O'Neill, Conor Demir‐Deviren, Sibel Lotz, Jeffrey C. Bailey, Jeannie F. Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title | Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title_full | Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title_fullStr | Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title_short | Influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
title_sort | influence of patient‐specific factors when comparing multifidus fat infiltration between chronic low back pain patients and asymptomatic controls |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36601370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1217 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballatorialexanderm influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT shahrestanishane influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT nyayapatipriya influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT agarwalvibhu influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT krugroland influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT hanmisung influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT fieldsaaronj influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT oneillconor influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT demirdevirensibel influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT lotzjeffreyc influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols AT baileyjeannief influenceofpatientspecificfactorswhencomparingmultifidusfatinfiltrationbetweenchroniclowbackpainpatientsandasymptomaticcontrols |