Cargando…
Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Physiological Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021 |
_version_ | 1784861050833731584 |
---|---|
author | Esfandiari, Jahangir Razavizadeh, Seyedsina Stenner, Max-Philipp |
author_facet | Esfandiari, Jahangir Razavizadeh, Seyedsina Stenner, Max-Philipp |
author_sort | Esfandiari, Jahangir |
collection | PubMed |
description | Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here, we examined whether permitting versus constraining movement variability via target shape alters motor learning rate in one and the same individual. Healthy young subjects made reaching movements to visual targets in two-dimensional space with their unseen hand. During an initial priming phase, the shape of targets allowed for movement variability either in direction (arc-shaped targets), or, in a separate session, in extent (radially oriented line-shaped targets), while requiring highly precise movements in the other spatial dimension, respectively. In subsequent test phases in each session, we quantified the rate of (single-trial) motor adaptation to visuomotor perturbations along these two spatial dimensions (rotation and gain). During priming, we observed higher variability in movement direction for arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for variability in movement extent. As predicted, participants adapted more to a visuomotor rotation following priming with arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for adaptation to a change in visuomotor gain. This effect was prominent in the part of the examined workspace where variability in initial movement trajectories was highest, suggesting high planning noise. Our results suggest that workspace redundancy can modulate motor adaptation in a spatially specific manner, however, this modulation may depend on the level of planning noise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Interindividual differences in motor adaptation are partly explained by differences in movement variability. Movement variability is higher in a redundant workspace. Can workspace redundancy increase adaptation? In a within-subject experiment, we show that moving in a workspace that permits versus constrains movement variability in a given spatial dimension modulates adaptation rate in that dimension, at least in part of the workspace where initial movement trajectories vary most, indicating planning noise. Redundant workspaces might aid rehabilitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9799134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Physiological Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-97991342023-01-09 Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? Esfandiari, Jahangir Razavizadeh, Seyedsina Stenner, Max-Philipp J Neurophysiol Research Article Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here, we examined whether permitting versus constraining movement variability via target shape alters motor learning rate in one and the same individual. Healthy young subjects made reaching movements to visual targets in two-dimensional space with their unseen hand. During an initial priming phase, the shape of targets allowed for movement variability either in direction (arc-shaped targets), or, in a separate session, in extent (radially oriented line-shaped targets), while requiring highly precise movements in the other spatial dimension, respectively. In subsequent test phases in each session, we quantified the rate of (single-trial) motor adaptation to visuomotor perturbations along these two spatial dimensions (rotation and gain). During priming, we observed higher variability in movement direction for arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for variability in movement extent. As predicted, participants adapted more to a visuomotor rotation following priming with arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for adaptation to a change in visuomotor gain. This effect was prominent in the part of the examined workspace where variability in initial movement trajectories was highest, suggesting high planning noise. Our results suggest that workspace redundancy can modulate motor adaptation in a spatially specific manner, however, this modulation may depend on the level of planning noise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Interindividual differences in motor adaptation are partly explained by differences in movement variability. Movement variability is higher in a redundant workspace. Can workspace redundancy increase adaptation? In a within-subject experiment, we show that moving in a workspace that permits versus constrains movement variability in a given spatial dimension modulates adaptation rate in that dimension, at least in part of the workspace where initial movement trajectories vary most, indicating planning noise. Redundant workspaces might aid rehabilitation. American Physiological Society 2022-12-01 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9799134/ /pubmed/36416444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Esfandiari, Jahangir Razavizadeh, Seyedsina Stenner, Max-Philipp Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title | Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title_full | Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title_fullStr | Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title_short | Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
title_sort | can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT esfandiarijahangir canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation AT razavizadehseyedsina canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation AT stennermaxphilipp canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation |