Cargando…

Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?

Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Esfandiari, Jahangir, Razavizadeh, Seyedsina, Stenner, Max-Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Physiological Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021
_version_ 1784861050833731584
author Esfandiari, Jahangir
Razavizadeh, Seyedsina
Stenner, Max-Philipp
author_facet Esfandiari, Jahangir
Razavizadeh, Seyedsina
Stenner, Max-Philipp
author_sort Esfandiari, Jahangir
collection PubMed
description Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here, we examined whether permitting versus constraining movement variability via target shape alters motor learning rate in one and the same individual. Healthy young subjects made reaching movements to visual targets in two-dimensional space with their unseen hand. During an initial priming phase, the shape of targets allowed for movement variability either in direction (arc-shaped targets), or, in a separate session, in extent (radially oriented line-shaped targets), while requiring highly precise movements in the other spatial dimension, respectively. In subsequent test phases in each session, we quantified the rate of (single-trial) motor adaptation to visuomotor perturbations along these two spatial dimensions (rotation and gain). During priming, we observed higher variability in movement direction for arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for variability in movement extent. As predicted, participants adapted more to a visuomotor rotation following priming with arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for adaptation to a change in visuomotor gain. This effect was prominent in the part of the examined workspace where variability in initial movement trajectories was highest, suggesting high planning noise. Our results suggest that workspace redundancy can modulate motor adaptation in a spatially specific manner, however, this modulation may depend on the level of planning noise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Interindividual differences in motor adaptation are partly explained by differences in movement variability. Movement variability is higher in a redundant workspace. Can workspace redundancy increase adaptation? In a within-subject experiment, we show that moving in a workspace that permits versus constrains movement variability in a given spatial dimension modulates adaptation rate in that dimension, at least in part of the workspace where initial movement trajectories vary most, indicating planning noise. Redundant workspaces might aid rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9799134
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Physiological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97991342023-01-09 Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation? Esfandiari, Jahangir Razavizadeh, Seyedsina Stenner, Max-Philipp J Neurophysiol Research Article Variability in behavior can be a manifestation of unwanted noise. However, variability can also reflect exploration and benefit learning. For example, it has been shown that interindividual differences in motor learning can be partly explained by differences in movement variability at baseline. Here, we examined whether permitting versus constraining movement variability via target shape alters motor learning rate in one and the same individual. Healthy young subjects made reaching movements to visual targets in two-dimensional space with their unseen hand. During an initial priming phase, the shape of targets allowed for movement variability either in direction (arc-shaped targets), or, in a separate session, in extent (radially oriented line-shaped targets), while requiring highly precise movements in the other spatial dimension, respectively. In subsequent test phases in each session, we quantified the rate of (single-trial) motor adaptation to visuomotor perturbations along these two spatial dimensions (rotation and gain). During priming, we observed higher variability in movement direction for arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for variability in movement extent. As predicted, participants adapted more to a visuomotor rotation following priming with arc-shaped targets, compared with radial line-shaped targets, and vice versa for adaptation to a change in visuomotor gain. This effect was prominent in the part of the examined workspace where variability in initial movement trajectories was highest, suggesting high planning noise. Our results suggest that workspace redundancy can modulate motor adaptation in a spatially specific manner, however, this modulation may depend on the level of planning noise. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Interindividual differences in motor adaptation are partly explained by differences in movement variability. Movement variability is higher in a redundant workspace. Can workspace redundancy increase adaptation? In a within-subject experiment, we show that moving in a workspace that permits versus constrains movement variability in a given spatial dimension modulates adaptation rate in that dimension, at least in part of the workspace where initial movement trajectories vary most, indicating planning noise. Redundant workspaces might aid rehabilitation. American Physiological Society 2022-12-01 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9799134/ /pubmed/36416444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution CC-BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Published by the American Physiological Society.
spellingShingle Research Article
Esfandiari, Jahangir
Razavizadeh, Seyedsina
Stenner, Max-Philipp
Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title_full Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title_fullStr Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title_full_unstemmed Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title_short Can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
title_sort can moving in a redundant workspace accelerate motor adaptation?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799134/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36416444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00458.2021
work_keys_str_mv AT esfandiarijahangir canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation
AT razavizadehseyedsina canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation
AT stennermaxphilipp canmovinginaredundantworkspaceacceleratemotoradaptation