Cargando…

Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence

BACKGROUND: High levels of loneliness are associated with negative health outcomes and there are several different types of interventions targeted at reducing feelings of loneliness. It is therefore important to accurately measure loneliness. A key unresolved debate in the conceptualisation and meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollet, Thomas V., Thompson, Alexandra, Malcolm, Connor, McCarty, Kristofor, Saxton, Tamsin K., Roberts, Sam G. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266167
_version_ 1784861072269770752
author Pollet, Thomas V.
Thompson, Alexandra
Malcolm, Connor
McCarty, Kristofor
Saxton, Tamsin K.
Roberts, Sam G. B.
author_facet Pollet, Thomas V.
Thompson, Alexandra
Malcolm, Connor
McCarty, Kristofor
Saxton, Tamsin K.
Roberts, Sam G. B.
author_sort Pollet, Thomas V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High levels of loneliness are associated with negative health outcomes and there are several different types of interventions targeted at reducing feelings of loneliness. It is therefore important to accurately measure loneliness. A key unresolved debate in the conceptualisation and measurement of loneliness is whether it has a unidimensional or multidimensional structure. The aim of this study was to examine the dimensional structure of the widely used UCLA Loneliness Scale and establish whether this factorial structure is equivalent in men and women. METHODS AND SAMPLE: Two online UK-based samples were recruited using Prolific. The participants in Study 1 were 492 adults, selected to be nationally representative by age and gender, whilst the participants in Study 2 were 290 older adults aged over 64. In both studies, participants completed the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) as part of a larger project. RESULTS: In both studies, the best fitting model was one with three factors corresponding to ‘Isolation,’ ‘Relational Connectedness,’ and ‘Collective Connectedness.’ A unidimensional single factor model was a substantially worse fit in both studies. In both studies, there were no meaningful differences between men and women in any of the three factors, suggesting measurement invariance across genders. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with previous research in supporting a multidimensional, three factor structure to the UCLA scale, rather than a unidimensional structure. Further, the measurement invariance across genders suggests that the UCLA scale can be used to compare levels of loneliness across men and women. Overall the results suggest that loneliness has different facets and thus future research should consider treating the UCLA loneliness scale as a multidimensional scale, or using other scales which are designed to measure the different aspects of loneliness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9799294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-97992942022-12-30 Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence Pollet, Thomas V. Thompson, Alexandra Malcolm, Connor McCarty, Kristofor Saxton, Tamsin K. Roberts, Sam G. B. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: High levels of loneliness are associated with negative health outcomes and there are several different types of interventions targeted at reducing feelings of loneliness. It is therefore important to accurately measure loneliness. A key unresolved debate in the conceptualisation and measurement of loneliness is whether it has a unidimensional or multidimensional structure. The aim of this study was to examine the dimensional structure of the widely used UCLA Loneliness Scale and establish whether this factorial structure is equivalent in men and women. METHODS AND SAMPLE: Two online UK-based samples were recruited using Prolific. The participants in Study 1 were 492 adults, selected to be nationally representative by age and gender, whilst the participants in Study 2 were 290 older adults aged over 64. In both studies, participants completed the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) as part of a larger project. RESULTS: In both studies, the best fitting model was one with three factors corresponding to ‘Isolation,’ ‘Relational Connectedness,’ and ‘Collective Connectedness.’ A unidimensional single factor model was a substantially worse fit in both studies. In both studies, there were no meaningful differences between men and women in any of the three factors, suggesting measurement invariance across genders. CONCLUSION: These results are consistent with previous research in supporting a multidimensional, three factor structure to the UCLA scale, rather than a unidimensional structure. Further, the measurement invariance across genders suggests that the UCLA scale can be used to compare levels of loneliness across men and women. Overall the results suggest that loneliness has different facets and thus future research should consider treating the UCLA loneliness scale as a multidimensional scale, or using other scales which are designed to measure the different aspects of loneliness. Public Library of Science 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9799294/ /pubmed/36580475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266167 Text en © 2022 Pollet et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pollet, Thomas V.
Thompson, Alexandra
Malcolm, Connor
McCarty, Kristofor
Saxton, Tamsin K.
Roberts, Sam G. B.
Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title_full Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title_fullStr Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title_full_unstemmed Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title_short Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence
title_sort are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? two studies of measurement equivalence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9799294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266167
work_keys_str_mv AT polletthomasv arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence
AT thompsonalexandra arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence
AT malcolmconnor arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence
AT mccartykristofor arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence
AT saxtontamsink arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence
AT robertssamgb arewemeasuringlonelinessinthesamewayinmenandwomeninthegeneralpopulationandintheolderpopulationtwostudiesofmeasurementequivalence