Cargando…

Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review

Background  Perioperative stroke, delirium, and cognitive impairment could be related to management and to variations in blood pressure control, cerebral hypoperfusion and raised blood volume. Cerebral autoregulation (CAR) is a mechanism to maintain cerebral perfusion through the control of the vasc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos, Thirumala, Parthasarathy Deenadayalan, Reddy, Gautama, Barros, Daniel Ferreira de, Faria, Vinicius Naves Rezende, Shandal, Varun, Kurtz, Pedro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758648
_version_ 1784861232734404608
author Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos
Thirumala, Parthasarathy Deenadayalan
Reddy, Gautama
Barros, Daniel Ferreira de
Faria, Vinicius Naves Rezende
Shandal, Varun
Kurtz, Pedro
author_facet Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos
Thirumala, Parthasarathy Deenadayalan
Reddy, Gautama
Barros, Daniel Ferreira de
Faria, Vinicius Naves Rezende
Shandal, Varun
Kurtz, Pedro
author_sort Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos
collection PubMed
description Background  Perioperative stroke, delirium, and cognitive impairment could be related to management and to variations in blood pressure control, cerebral hypoperfusion and raised blood volume. Cerebral autoregulation (CAR) is a mechanism to maintain cerebral perfusion through the control of the vascular tone and hemodynamic reactions in the circulation. Objective  The present systematic review addresses the relationship between impaired CAR and perioperative stroke by evaluating the rate of neurological complications after surgery in studies in which perioperative CAR was tested or monitored. Methods  We included randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies. All studies had adjusted the relative risk, hazard ratio or 95% confidence interval (95%CI) values. These estimation effects were tested using random-effects models. Heterogeneity among the selected studies was assessed using the Higgins and Thompson I (2) statistics. Results  The Web of Science, PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases were searched to retrieve articles. A total of 4,476 studies published between 1983 and 2019 were analyzed, but only 5 qualified for the data extraction and were included in the final analysis. The combined study cohort comprised 941 patients who underwent CAR monitoring during surgical procedures. All studies provided information about perioperative stroke, which equated to 16% (158 of 941) of the overall patient population. Conclusion  The present meta-analysis showed evidence of the impact of CAR impairment in the risk of perioperative stroke. On the pooled analysis, blood fluctuations or other brain insults large enough to compromise CAR were associated with the outcome of stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 2.26; 95%CI: 1.54–2.98; p  < 0.0001).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9800166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98001662023-01-09 Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos Thirumala, Parthasarathy Deenadayalan Reddy, Gautama Barros, Daniel Ferreira de Faria, Vinicius Naves Rezende Shandal, Varun Kurtz, Pedro Arq Neuropsiquiatr Background  Perioperative stroke, delirium, and cognitive impairment could be related to management and to variations in blood pressure control, cerebral hypoperfusion and raised blood volume. Cerebral autoregulation (CAR) is a mechanism to maintain cerebral perfusion through the control of the vascular tone and hemodynamic reactions in the circulation. Objective  The present systematic review addresses the relationship between impaired CAR and perioperative stroke by evaluating the rate of neurological complications after surgery in studies in which perioperative CAR was tested or monitored. Methods  We included randomized clinical trials and prospective observational studies. All studies had adjusted the relative risk, hazard ratio or 95% confidence interval (95%CI) values. These estimation effects were tested using random-effects models. Heterogeneity among the selected studies was assessed using the Higgins and Thompson I (2) statistics. Results  The Web of Science, PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases were searched to retrieve articles. A total of 4,476 studies published between 1983 and 2019 were analyzed, but only 5 qualified for the data extraction and were included in the final analysis. The combined study cohort comprised 941 patients who underwent CAR monitoring during surgical procedures. All studies provided information about perioperative stroke, which equated to 16% (158 of 941) of the overall patient population. Conclusion  The present meta-analysis showed evidence of the impact of CAR impairment in the risk of perioperative stroke. On the pooled analysis, blood fluctuations or other brain insults large enough to compromise CAR were associated with the outcome of stroke (odds ratio [OR]: 2.26; 95%CI: 1.54–2.98; p  < 0.0001). Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9800166/ /pubmed/36580956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758648 Text en Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Santos, Daniel Paes de Almeida dos
Thirumala, Parthasarathy Deenadayalan
Reddy, Gautama
Barros, Daniel Ferreira de
Faria, Vinicius Naves Rezende
Shandal, Varun
Kurtz, Pedro
Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title_full Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title_fullStr Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title_short Risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
title_sort risk of perioperative stroke and cerebral autoregulation monitoring: a systematic review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36580956
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1758648
work_keys_str_mv AT santosdanielpaesdealmeidados riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT thirumalaparthasarathydeenadayalan riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT reddygautama riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT barrosdanielferreirade riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT fariaviniciusnavesrezende riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT shandalvarun riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview
AT kurtzpedro riskofperioperativestrokeandcerebralautoregulationmonitoringasystematicreview