Cargando…
Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569 |
_version_ | 1784861255171833856 |
---|---|
author | Iori, Federico Cappelli, Anna D'Angelo, Elisa Cozzi, Salvatore Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi De Felice, Francesca Ciammella, Patrizia Bruni, Alessio Iotti, Cinzia |
author_facet | Iori, Federico Cappelli, Anna D'Angelo, Elisa Cozzi, Salvatore Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi De Felice, Francesca Ciammella, Patrizia Bruni, Alessio Iotti, Cinzia |
author_sort | Iori, Federico |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. METHOD: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. RESULTS: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3–6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. CONCLUSION: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9800252 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98002522022-12-31 Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review Iori, Federico Cappelli, Anna D'Angelo, Elisa Cozzi, Salvatore Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi De Felice, Francesca Ciammella, Patrizia Bruni, Alessio Iotti, Cinzia Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. METHOD: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. RESULTS: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3–6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. CONCLUSION: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described. Elsevier 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9800252/ /pubmed/36590825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Iori, Federico Cappelli, Anna D'Angelo, Elisa Cozzi, Salvatore Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi De Felice, Francesca Ciammella, Patrizia Bruni, Alessio Iotti, Cinzia Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title | Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title_full | Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title_short | Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review |
title_sort | lattice radiation therapy in clinical practice: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800252/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iorifederico latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT cappellianna latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT dangeloelisa latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT cozzisalvatore latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT ghersisebastianofinocchi latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT defelicefrancesca latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT ciammellapatrizia latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT brunialessio latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview AT iotticinzia latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview |