Cargando…

Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review

PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iori, Federico, Cappelli, Anna, D'Angelo, Elisa, Cozzi, Salvatore, Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi, De Felice, Francesca, Ciammella, Patrizia, Bruni, Alessio, Iotti, Cinzia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569
_version_ 1784861255171833856
author Iori, Federico
Cappelli, Anna
D'Angelo, Elisa
Cozzi, Salvatore
Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi
De Felice, Francesca
Ciammella, Patrizia
Bruni, Alessio
Iotti, Cinzia
author_facet Iori, Federico
Cappelli, Anna
D'Angelo, Elisa
Cozzi, Salvatore
Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi
De Felice, Francesca
Ciammella, Patrizia
Bruni, Alessio
Iotti, Cinzia
author_sort Iori, Federico
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. METHOD: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. RESULTS: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3–6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. CONCLUSION: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9800252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98002522022-12-31 Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review Iori, Federico Cappelli, Anna D'Angelo, Elisa Cozzi, Salvatore Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi De Felice, Francesca Ciammella, Patrizia Bruni, Alessio Iotti, Cinzia Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Review Article PURPOSE: Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy. METHOD: Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed. RESULTS: Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3–6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered. CONCLUSION: This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described. Elsevier 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9800252/ /pubmed/36590825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Iori, Federico
Cappelli, Anna
D'Angelo, Elisa
Cozzi, Salvatore
Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi
De Felice, Francesca
Ciammella, Patrizia
Bruni, Alessio
Iotti, Cinzia
Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title_full Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title_fullStr Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title_short Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review
title_sort lattice radiation therapy in clinical practice: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2022.100569
work_keys_str_mv AT iorifederico latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT cappellianna latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT dangeloelisa latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT cozzisalvatore latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT ghersisebastianofinocchi latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT defelicefrancesca latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT ciammellapatrizia latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT brunialessio latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview
AT iotticinzia latticeradiationtherapyinclinicalpracticeasystematicreview