Cargando…

Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents

The dimensional model of adversity proposes that experiences of threat and deprivation have distinct neurodevelopmental consequences. We examined these dimensions, separately and jointly, with brain structure in a sample of 149 youth aged 8–17—half recruited based on exposure to threat-related exper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peverill, Matthew, Rosen, Maya L., Lurie, Lucy A., Sambrook, Kelly A., Sheridan, Margaret A., McLaughlin, Katie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36563460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101180
_version_ 1784861259063099392
author Peverill, Matthew
Rosen, Maya L.
Lurie, Lucy A.
Sambrook, Kelly A.
Sheridan, Margaret A.
McLaughlin, Katie A.
author_facet Peverill, Matthew
Rosen, Maya L.
Lurie, Lucy A.
Sambrook, Kelly A.
Sheridan, Margaret A.
McLaughlin, Katie A.
author_sort Peverill, Matthew
collection PubMed
description The dimensional model of adversity proposes that experiences of threat and deprivation have distinct neurodevelopmental consequences. We examined these dimensions, separately and jointly, with brain structure in a sample of 149 youth aged 8–17—half recruited based on exposure to threat-related experiences. We predicted that greater threat would be uniquely associated with reduced cortical thickness and surface area in brain regions associated with salience processing including ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and insula, and that deprivation experiences would be uniquely associated with reductions in cortical thickness and surface area in frontoparietal areas associated with cognitive control. As predicted, greater threat was associated with thinner cortex in a network including areas involved in salience processing (anterior insula, vmPFC), and smaller amygdala volume (particularly in younger participants), after controlling for deprivation. Contrary to our hypotheses, threat was also associated with thinning in the frontoparietal control network. However, these associations were reduced following control for deprivation. No associations were found between deprivation and brain structure. This examination of deprivation and threat concurrently in the same sample provided further evidence that threat-related experiences influence the structure of the developing brain independent of deprivation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9800267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98002672022-12-31 Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents Peverill, Matthew Rosen, Maya L. Lurie, Lucy A. Sambrook, Kelly A. Sheridan, Margaret A. McLaughlin, Katie A. Dev Cogn Neurosci Original Research The dimensional model of adversity proposes that experiences of threat and deprivation have distinct neurodevelopmental consequences. We examined these dimensions, separately and jointly, with brain structure in a sample of 149 youth aged 8–17—half recruited based on exposure to threat-related experiences. We predicted that greater threat would be uniquely associated with reduced cortical thickness and surface area in brain regions associated with salience processing including ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and insula, and that deprivation experiences would be uniquely associated with reductions in cortical thickness and surface area in frontoparietal areas associated with cognitive control. As predicted, greater threat was associated with thinner cortex in a network including areas involved in salience processing (anterior insula, vmPFC), and smaller amygdala volume (particularly in younger participants), after controlling for deprivation. Contrary to our hypotheses, threat was also associated with thinning in the frontoparietal control network. However, these associations were reduced following control for deprivation. No associations were found between deprivation and brain structure. This examination of deprivation and threat concurrently in the same sample provided further evidence that threat-related experiences influence the structure of the developing brain independent of deprivation. Elsevier 2022-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9800267/ /pubmed/36563460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101180 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Peverill, Matthew
Rosen, Maya L.
Lurie, Lucy A.
Sambrook, Kelly A.
Sheridan, Margaret A.
McLaughlin, Katie A.
Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title_full Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title_fullStr Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title_short Childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
title_sort childhood trauma and brain structure in children and adolescents
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36563460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2022.101180
work_keys_str_mv AT peverillmatthew childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents
AT rosenmayal childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents
AT lurielucya childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents
AT sambrookkellya childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents
AT sheridanmargareta childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents
AT mclaughlinkatiea childhoodtraumaandbrainstructureinchildrenandadolescents