Cargando…

Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development

The present study investigated the differential effects of explicit corrections, meta-linguistic corrective feedback (CF), and analogy-based CF on L2 learners' acquisition of English third-person singular form -s and whether and how individual differences in working memory (WM) mediate such eff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liao, Yi, Zhang, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591080
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811748
_version_ 1784861263272083456
author Liao, Yi
Zhang, Wei
author_facet Liao, Yi
Zhang, Wei
author_sort Liao, Yi
collection PubMed
description The present study investigated the differential effects of explicit corrections, meta-linguistic corrective feedback (CF), and analogy-based CF on L2 learners' acquisition of English third-person singular form -s and whether and how individual differences in working memory (WM) mediate such effects. One hundred secondary school English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners at a junior middle school in inland China were randomly assigned to the explicit correction group (EG), the meta-linguistic CF group (MG), the analogy-based CF group (AG), and the control group (CG). Learners performed both an information-gap activity and a picture-description activity where their errors on target structure were treated according to their group assignment. The Untimed Grammatical Judgement Test (UGJT) and the Elicited Oral Production Test (EOPT) were used to measure learners' resulting performance. Learners' WM was measured with operation span test. Results revealed that (1) compared to the control group, all the CF groups significantly improved their performance of English third-person singular form -s over time; (2) explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF displayed superior advantages over analogy-based CF on the immediate posttest. However, the three CF groups demonstrated no significant difference in their performance of English third-person singular form -s on the delayed posttest; (3) WM was only able to predict the effects of analogy-based CF but not explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF; and (4) analogy-based CF was more favorable to learners with higher WM who can regulate their limited attentional resources more efficiently, whereas explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF equalize learning opportunities for all learners with different levels of WM. The findings of this study suggest optimal, profile-matched pedagogical options for L2 learning through identifying CF conditions that cater to the needs of young learners with different levels of WM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9800285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98002852022-12-31 Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development Liao, Yi Zhang, Wei Front Psychol Psychology The present study investigated the differential effects of explicit corrections, meta-linguistic corrective feedback (CF), and analogy-based CF on L2 learners' acquisition of English third-person singular form -s and whether and how individual differences in working memory (WM) mediate such effects. One hundred secondary school English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners at a junior middle school in inland China were randomly assigned to the explicit correction group (EG), the meta-linguistic CF group (MG), the analogy-based CF group (AG), and the control group (CG). Learners performed both an information-gap activity and a picture-description activity where their errors on target structure were treated according to their group assignment. The Untimed Grammatical Judgement Test (UGJT) and the Elicited Oral Production Test (EOPT) were used to measure learners' resulting performance. Learners' WM was measured with operation span test. Results revealed that (1) compared to the control group, all the CF groups significantly improved their performance of English third-person singular form -s over time; (2) explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF displayed superior advantages over analogy-based CF on the immediate posttest. However, the three CF groups demonstrated no significant difference in their performance of English third-person singular form -s on the delayed posttest; (3) WM was only able to predict the effects of analogy-based CF but not explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF; and (4) analogy-based CF was more favorable to learners with higher WM who can regulate their limited attentional resources more efficiently, whereas explicit corrections and meta-linguistic CF equalize learning opportunities for all learners with different levels of WM. The findings of this study suggest optimal, profile-matched pedagogical options for L2 learning through identifying CF conditions that cater to the needs of young learners with different levels of WM. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9800285/ /pubmed/36591080 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811748 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liao and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Liao, Yi
Zhang, Wei
Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title_full Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title_fullStr Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title_full_unstemmed Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title_short Corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and L2 development
title_sort corrective feedback, individual differences in working memory, and l2 development
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591080
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811748
work_keys_str_mv AT liaoyi correctivefeedbackindividualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandl2development
AT zhangwei correctivefeedbackindividualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandl2development