Cargando…

The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic

Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moshofsky, Kaycee, Aripov, Anastacia, Chang, Eric, Bednar, Michelle, Bennett, Peter, Hedlund, Susan, Cook, Kiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0
_version_ 1784861281104166912
author Moshofsky, Kaycee
Aripov, Anastacia
Chang, Eric
Bednar, Michelle
Bennett, Peter
Hedlund, Susan
Cook, Kiri
author_facet Moshofsky, Kaycee
Aripov, Anastacia
Chang, Eric
Bednar, Michelle
Bennett, Peter
Hedlund, Susan
Cook, Kiri
author_sort Moshofsky, Kaycee
collection PubMed
description Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade for patients following the implementation of a psychosocial needs screening tool. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital radiation oncology clinic. Participants who were 18 years or older and presenting for their initial radiation oncology appointment were asked to complete a screening survey. From December 2019 to January 2021, 242 patients completed the survey. 70% of patients were seen for consideration of definitive therapy. 62% of patients checked “yes” to at least one item, most commonly supportive/palliative care (33%), exercise/PT (26%) and advance care planning (26%). Among definitive patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (33%) and exercise/PT (26%). Among palliative patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (42%) and advance care planning (32%). Participants were followed for 6 months after taking the survey. 74% of patients with a positive screening survey were contacted by a social worker and/or had a new referral placed with 47% of those patients ultimately attending a new appointment. Screening tools are commonly implemented to quickly identify needs in oncology patients. This study tracked patients following this type of intervention to determine what proportion of patients ultimately received care related to the identified need. Despite the majority of patients being referred to a relevant provider, fewer than half ultimately attended appointments. The combination of a screening tool with social work triage may be an effective way to distribute resources and properly route patients to supportive care providers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9800361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98003612022-12-31 The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic Moshofsky, Kaycee Aripov, Anastacia Chang, Eric Bednar, Michelle Bennett, Peter Hedlund, Susan Cook, Kiri Sci Rep Article Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade for patients following the implementation of a psychosocial needs screening tool. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital radiation oncology clinic. Participants who were 18 years or older and presenting for their initial radiation oncology appointment were asked to complete a screening survey. From December 2019 to January 2021, 242 patients completed the survey. 70% of patients were seen for consideration of definitive therapy. 62% of patients checked “yes” to at least one item, most commonly supportive/palliative care (33%), exercise/PT (26%) and advance care planning (26%). Among definitive patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (33%) and exercise/PT (26%). Among palliative patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (42%) and advance care planning (32%). Participants were followed for 6 months after taking the survey. 74% of patients with a positive screening survey were contacted by a social worker and/or had a new referral placed with 47% of those patients ultimately attending a new appointment. Screening tools are commonly implemented to quickly identify needs in oncology patients. This study tracked patients following this type of intervention to determine what proportion of patients ultimately received care related to the identified need. Despite the majority of patients being referred to a relevant provider, fewer than half ultimately attended appointments. The combination of a screening tool with social work triage may be an effective way to distribute resources and properly route patients to supportive care providers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9800361/ /pubmed/36581767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Moshofsky, Kaycee
Aripov, Anastacia
Chang, Eric
Bednar, Michelle
Bennett, Peter
Hedlund, Susan
Cook, Kiri
The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title_full The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title_fullStr The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title_full_unstemmed The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title_short The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
title_sort care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581767
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0
work_keys_str_mv AT moshofskykaycee thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT aripovanastacia thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT changeric thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT bednarmichelle thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT bennettpeter thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT hedlundsusan thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT cookkiri thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT moshofskykaycee carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT aripovanastacia carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT changeric carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT bednarmichelle carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT bennettpeter carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT hedlundsusan carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic
AT cookkiri carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic