Cargando…
The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic
Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0 |
_version_ | 1784861281104166912 |
---|---|
author | Moshofsky, Kaycee Aripov, Anastacia Chang, Eric Bednar, Michelle Bennett, Peter Hedlund, Susan Cook, Kiri |
author_facet | Moshofsky, Kaycee Aripov, Anastacia Chang, Eric Bednar, Michelle Bennett, Peter Hedlund, Susan Cook, Kiri |
author_sort | Moshofsky, Kaycee |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade for patients following the implementation of a psychosocial needs screening tool. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital radiation oncology clinic. Participants who were 18 years or older and presenting for their initial radiation oncology appointment were asked to complete a screening survey. From December 2019 to January 2021, 242 patients completed the survey. 70% of patients were seen for consideration of definitive therapy. 62% of patients checked “yes” to at least one item, most commonly supportive/palliative care (33%), exercise/PT (26%) and advance care planning (26%). Among definitive patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (33%) and exercise/PT (26%). Among palliative patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (42%) and advance care planning (32%). Participants were followed for 6 months after taking the survey. 74% of patients with a positive screening survey were contacted by a social worker and/or had a new referral placed with 47% of those patients ultimately attending a new appointment. Screening tools are commonly implemented to quickly identify needs in oncology patients. This study tracked patients following this type of intervention to determine what proportion of patients ultimately received care related to the identified need. Despite the majority of patients being referred to a relevant provider, fewer than half ultimately attended appointments. The combination of a screening tool with social work triage may be an effective way to distribute resources and properly route patients to supportive care providers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9800361 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98003612022-12-31 The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic Moshofsky, Kaycee Aripov, Anastacia Chang, Eric Bednar, Michelle Bennett, Peter Hedlund, Susan Cook, Kiri Sci Rep Article Patients with cancer have many psychosocial needs, some of which may be addressed by implementation of a screening tool. However, it is unknown what ultimately happens (i.e., the “care cascade”) to patients following these interventions. The objective of this study was to evaluate the care cascade for patients following the implementation of a psychosocial needs screening tool. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a university hospital radiation oncology clinic. Participants who were 18 years or older and presenting for their initial radiation oncology appointment were asked to complete a screening survey. From December 2019 to January 2021, 242 patients completed the survey. 70% of patients were seen for consideration of definitive therapy. 62% of patients checked “yes” to at least one item, most commonly supportive/palliative care (33%), exercise/PT (26%) and advance care planning (26%). Among definitive patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (33%) and exercise/PT (26%). Among palliative patients, the most common were supportive/palliative care (42%) and advance care planning (32%). Participants were followed for 6 months after taking the survey. 74% of patients with a positive screening survey were contacted by a social worker and/or had a new referral placed with 47% of those patients ultimately attending a new appointment. Screening tools are commonly implemented to quickly identify needs in oncology patients. This study tracked patients following this type of intervention to determine what proportion of patients ultimately received care related to the identified need. Despite the majority of patients being referred to a relevant provider, fewer than half ultimately attended appointments. The combination of a screening tool with social work triage may be an effective way to distribute resources and properly route patients to supportive care providers. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9800361/ /pubmed/36581767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Moshofsky, Kaycee Aripov, Anastacia Chang, Eric Bednar, Michelle Bennett, Peter Hedlund, Susan Cook, Kiri The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title | The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title_full | The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title_fullStr | The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title_full_unstemmed | The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title_short | The care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
title_sort | care cascade following a supportive management intervention for patients presenting to a radiation oncology clinic |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800361/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581767 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27005-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moshofskykaycee thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT aripovanastacia thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT changeric thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT bednarmichelle thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT bennettpeter thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT hedlundsusan thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT cookkiri thecarecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT moshofskykaycee carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT aripovanastacia carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT changeric carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT bednarmichelle carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT bennettpeter carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT hedlundsusan carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic AT cookkiri carecascadefollowingasupportivemanagementinterventionforpatientspresentingtoaradiationoncologyclinic |