Cargando…
Outcomes of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of endoscopic and open resection of sinonasal malignancies. METHODS: The search was performed using PubMed (1950–2020), Embase (1974–2020), the Cochrane library, and the website clinicaltrials.gov. The hazard ratio, HR, 95% confidence interval, CI, of the rates of...
Autores principales: | Jiang, Sijie, Fan, Ruohao, Zhang, Hua, Jiang, Weihong, Xie, Zhihai |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34348855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.06.004 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for the management of sinonasal malignancies
por: Rajendran, Balamurugan
Publicado: (2020) -
Sinonasal malignancies: Endoscopic treatment outcomes
por: Carlton, Daniel A., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Preliminary Efficacy Report and Prognosis Analysis of Endoscopic Endonasal Nasopharyngectomy for Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
por: Peng, Zhouying, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Minimally invasive endoscopic resection for the treatment of sinonasal malignancy: the outcomes and risk factors for recurrence
por: He, Ning, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours
por: López, Fernando, et al.
Publicado: (2022)