Cargando…
Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4
One of the main goals of the teacher and the school system as a whole is to close learning gaps and support children with difficulties in learning. The identification of those children as well as the monitoring of their progress in learning is crucial for this task. The derivation of comparative sta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943581 |
_version_ | 1784861406952161280 |
---|---|
author | Schurig, Michael Blumenthal, Stefan Gebhardt, Markus |
author_facet | Schurig, Michael Blumenthal, Stefan Gebhardt, Markus |
author_sort | Schurig, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | One of the main goals of the teacher and the school system as a whole is to close learning gaps and support children with difficulties in learning. The identification of those children as well as the monitoring of their progress in learning is crucial for this task. The derivation of comparative standards that can be applied well in practice is a relevant quality criterion in this context. Continuous normalization is particularly useful for progress monitoring tests that can be conducted at different points in time. Areas that were not available in the normalization sample are extrapolated, closing gaps in applicability due to discontinuity. In Germany, teachers participated in a state-funded research project to formatively measure their children's spelling performance in primary school. Data (N = 3000) from grade two to four were scaled, linked and translated into comparative values that can be used in classrooms independently from specific times. The tests meet the requirements of item response models and can be transferred well to continuous norms. However, we recommend using the 10th or 20th percentile as cut-off points for educational measures, as the 5th percentile is not discriminating enough. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9800992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-98009922022-12-31 Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 Schurig, Michael Blumenthal, Stefan Gebhardt, Markus Front Psychol Psychology One of the main goals of the teacher and the school system as a whole is to close learning gaps and support children with difficulties in learning. The identification of those children as well as the monitoring of their progress in learning is crucial for this task. The derivation of comparative standards that can be applied well in practice is a relevant quality criterion in this context. Continuous normalization is particularly useful for progress monitoring tests that can be conducted at different points in time. Areas that were not available in the normalization sample are extrapolated, closing gaps in applicability due to discontinuity. In Germany, teachers participated in a state-funded research project to formatively measure their children's spelling performance in primary school. Data (N = 3000) from grade two to four were scaled, linked and translated into comparative values that can be used in classrooms independently from specific times. The tests meet the requirements of item response models and can be transferred well to continuous norms. However, we recommend using the 10th or 20th percentile as cut-off points for educational measures, as the 5th percentile is not discriminating enough. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9800992/ /pubmed/36591089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943581 Text en Copyright © 2022 Schurig, Blumenthal and Gebhardt. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Schurig, Michael Blumenthal, Stefan Gebhardt, Markus Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title | Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title_full | Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title_fullStr | Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title_short | Continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—An example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
title_sort | continuous norming in learning progress monitoring—an example for a test in spelling from grade 2–4 |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9800992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36591089 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.943581 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schurigmichael continuousnorminginlearningprogressmonitoringanexampleforatestinspellingfromgrade24 AT blumenthalstefan continuousnorminginlearningprogressmonitoringanexampleforatestinspellingfromgrade24 AT gebhardtmarkus continuousnorminginlearningprogressmonitoringanexampleforatestinspellingfromgrade24 |