Cargando…

Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts

OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence rates and symptomatic relief in symptomatic maxillary sinus Retention Cysts (RCs) between Middle Meatus Antrostomy (MMA) alone and Inferior Meatus Antrostomy (IMA) with basal mucosa electrocoagulation. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic unilateral maxillary RCs were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lou, Zhengcai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.006
_version_ 1784861413008736256
author Lou, Zhengcai
author_facet Lou, Zhengcai
author_sort Lou, Zhengcai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence rates and symptomatic relief in symptomatic maxillary sinus Retention Cysts (RCs) between Middle Meatus Antrostomy (MMA) alone and Inferior Meatus Antrostomy (IMA) with basal mucosa electrocoagulation. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic unilateral maxillary RCs were randomly allocated to MMA (n = 54) and IMA combined with mucosa electrocoagulation (n = 53) groups. Symptomatic relief, cyst recurrence, and closure of the antrostomy opening were compared at 12-months postoperatively. RESULTS: Symptomatic failure occurred in 13 (12.1%) patients, including 9 (16.7%) MMA and 4 (7.5%) IMA patients; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.251). Postoperative cyst recurrence occurred in 16 (29.7%) and 1 (1.9%) patient in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Closure of the opening occurred in 7 (13.0%) and 17 (32.1%) patients in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p = 0.032). However, there were no significant pairwise correlations between closure of the opening and symptomatic failure or cyst recurrence. CONCLUSION: IMA combined with basal mucosa electrocoagulation and MMA alone provided similar symptomatic relief for symptomatic maxillary RCs, but IMA had shorter operation times and lower postoperative recurrence rates of RCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9801031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98010312022-12-31 Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts Lou, Zhengcai Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare recurrence rates and symptomatic relief in symptomatic maxillary sinus Retention Cysts (RCs) between Middle Meatus Antrostomy (MMA) alone and Inferior Meatus Antrostomy (IMA) with basal mucosa electrocoagulation. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic unilateral maxillary RCs were randomly allocated to MMA (n = 54) and IMA combined with mucosa electrocoagulation (n = 53) groups. Symptomatic relief, cyst recurrence, and closure of the antrostomy opening were compared at 12-months postoperatively. RESULTS: Symptomatic failure occurred in 13 (12.1%) patients, including 9 (16.7%) MMA and 4 (7.5%) IMA patients; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.251). Postoperative cyst recurrence occurred in 16 (29.7%) and 1 (1.9%) patient in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Closure of the opening occurred in 7 (13.0%) and 17 (32.1%) patients in the MMA and IMA groups, respectively (p = 0.032). However, there were no significant pairwise correlations between closure of the opening and symptomatic failure or cyst recurrence. CONCLUSION: IMA combined with basal mucosa electrocoagulation and MMA alone provided similar symptomatic relief for symptomatic maxillary RCs, but IMA had shorter operation times and lower postoperative recurrence rates of RCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1b. Elsevier 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9801031/ /pubmed/35725950 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.006 Text en © 2022 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lou, Zhengcai
Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title_full Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title_fullStr Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title_full_unstemmed Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title_short Surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
title_sort surgical outcomes between two endoscopic approaches for maxillary cysts
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35725950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT louzhengcai surgicaloutcomesbetweentwoendoscopicapproachesformaxillarycysts