Cargando…

Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass

Currently, comparisons between biochar and activated carbon in terms of performance, environmental impacts as well as financial implications are limited. In this study, biochar sourced from date palm waste were analysed using gate-to-grave life cycle assessment approach and results were compared to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaheen, Jamal, Fseha, Yohanna Haile, Sizirici, Banu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12388
_version_ 1784861429185118208
author Shaheen, Jamal
Fseha, Yohanna Haile
Sizirici, Banu
author_facet Shaheen, Jamal
Fseha, Yohanna Haile
Sizirici, Banu
author_sort Shaheen, Jamal
collection PubMed
description Currently, comparisons between biochar and activated carbon in terms of performance, environmental impacts as well as financial implications are limited. In this study, biochar sourced from date palm waste were analysed using gate-to-grave life cycle assessment approach and results were compared to activated carbon derived from woody biomass. Simapro 8.5 software was used to quantitatively simulate the environmental impacts of both adsorbents. Date palm waste biochar and activated carbon global warming potentials (GWPs) were found to be 1.53 and 8.96 kg CO(2eq)/kg respectively. The cumulative energy demand (CED) for producing date palm waste biochar was found to be 20.3 MJ/kg, whereas, activated carbon resulted in 119.5 MJ/kg. Both adsorbents’ performance in terms of adsorption capacity were compared, and it was found that biochar is comparable with activated carbon. The economic performance demonstrated that the average cost of production of date palm waste biochar and activated carbon were $1.06/kg and $1.34/kg, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that when the source of energy was changed to renewable energy, a CED dropped to 105.2 MJ/kg and 7.68 MJ/kg, a GWP dropped to 7.29 kg CO(2) eq. and 0.665 kg CO(2) eq. and production costs dropped to $1.30 and to $1.04 for producing activated carbon and biochar respectively. Based on the results of the study, date palm waste biochar is more cost-effective, shows less environmental impact, and has comparable adsorption efficiency as compared to activated carbon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9801108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98011082022-12-31 Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass Shaheen, Jamal Fseha, Yohanna Haile Sizirici, Banu Heliyon Research Article Currently, comparisons between biochar and activated carbon in terms of performance, environmental impacts as well as financial implications are limited. In this study, biochar sourced from date palm waste were analysed using gate-to-grave life cycle assessment approach and results were compared to activated carbon derived from woody biomass. Simapro 8.5 software was used to quantitatively simulate the environmental impacts of both adsorbents. Date palm waste biochar and activated carbon global warming potentials (GWPs) were found to be 1.53 and 8.96 kg CO(2eq)/kg respectively. The cumulative energy demand (CED) for producing date palm waste biochar was found to be 20.3 MJ/kg, whereas, activated carbon resulted in 119.5 MJ/kg. Both adsorbents’ performance in terms of adsorption capacity were compared, and it was found that biochar is comparable with activated carbon. The economic performance demonstrated that the average cost of production of date palm waste biochar and activated carbon were $1.06/kg and $1.34/kg, respectively. Sensitivity analysis showed that when the source of energy was changed to renewable energy, a CED dropped to 105.2 MJ/kg and 7.68 MJ/kg, a GWP dropped to 7.29 kg CO(2) eq. and 0.665 kg CO(2) eq. and production costs dropped to $1.30 and to $1.04 for producing activated carbon and biochar respectively. Based on the results of the study, date palm waste biochar is more cost-effective, shows less environmental impact, and has comparable adsorption efficiency as compared to activated carbon. Elsevier 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9801108/ /pubmed/36590480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12388 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Shaheen, Jamal
Fseha, Yohanna Haile
Sizirici, Banu
Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title_full Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title_fullStr Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title_full_unstemmed Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title_short Performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
title_sort performance, life cycle assessment, and economic comparison between date palm waste biochar and activated carbon derived from woody biomass
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590480
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12388
work_keys_str_mv AT shaheenjamal performancelifecycleassessmentandeconomiccomparisonbetweendatepalmwastebiocharandactivatedcarbonderivedfromwoodybiomass
AT fsehayohannahaile performancelifecycleassessmentandeconomiccomparisonbetweendatepalmwastebiocharandactivatedcarbonderivedfromwoodybiomass
AT siziricibanu performancelifecycleassessmentandeconomiccomparisonbetweendatepalmwastebiocharandactivatedcarbonderivedfromwoodybiomass