Cargando…

Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus

BACKGROUND: Long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) such as entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) favorably affects the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the basis of data from randomized or matched control studies. Recent data suggest a lower HCC incidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Soo Ki, Fujii, Takako, Kim, Soo Ryang, Nakai, Atsushi, Lim, Young-Suk, Hagiwara, Satoru, Kudo, Masatoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525518
_version_ 1784861445986451456
author Kim, Soo Ki
Fujii, Takako
Kim, Soo Ryang
Nakai, Atsushi
Lim, Young-Suk
Hagiwara, Satoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
author_facet Kim, Soo Ki
Fujii, Takako
Kim, Soo Ryang
Nakai, Atsushi
Lim, Young-Suk
Hagiwara, Satoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
author_sort Kim, Soo Ki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) such as entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) favorably affects the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the basis of data from randomized or matched control studies. Recent data suggest a lower HCC incidence after 5 years of ETV or TDF therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, especially those with baseline cirrhosis. SUMMARY: Three controversial issues remain to be resolved regarding hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment and HCC. (1) The efficacy of antiviral treatment for the prevention of HCC is not established. The guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) for the management of HBV infection state that antiviral treatment of HBV with interferon and NAs prevents the development of HCC. Among experts in CHB treatment, however, there is disagreement on the HCC prevention effects of antiviral treatment. (2) The rationale for antiviral management in patients with high HBV DNA and normal levels of alanine aminotransferase is unclear. The AASLD, EASL, and APASL guidelines do not recommend antiviral treatment for immune-tolerant CHB patients, and the terms and methods of treating such patients remain to be clarified. (3) The efficacy of first-line treatment with NAs, including ETV, TDF, and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF), to prevent HCC in CHB patients remains unknown. Several studies have produced controversial results regarding the effects of NAs on the risk and prevention of HCC. In the present review, we discuss these 3 issues, citing recent studies and clinical management guidelines from major international associations. KEY MESSAGES: Suggested approaches for reaching a consensus including applying the propensity score matching method, performing randomized controlled studies, and performing clinical studies with larger numbers of subjects and longer follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9801176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98011762022-12-31 Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus Kim, Soo Ki Fujii, Takako Kim, Soo Ryang Nakai, Atsushi Lim, Young-Suk Hagiwara, Satoru Kudo, Masatoshi Liver Cancer Review Article BACKGROUND: Long-term therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) such as entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) favorably affects the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the basis of data from randomized or matched control studies. Recent data suggest a lower HCC incidence after 5 years of ETV or TDF therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, especially those with baseline cirrhosis. SUMMARY: Three controversial issues remain to be resolved regarding hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment and HCC. (1) The efficacy of antiviral treatment for the prevention of HCC is not established. The guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) for the management of HBV infection state that antiviral treatment of HBV with interferon and NAs prevents the development of HCC. Among experts in CHB treatment, however, there is disagreement on the HCC prevention effects of antiviral treatment. (2) The rationale for antiviral management in patients with high HBV DNA and normal levels of alanine aminotransferase is unclear. The AASLD, EASL, and APASL guidelines do not recommend antiviral treatment for immune-tolerant CHB patients, and the terms and methods of treating such patients remain to be clarified. (3) The efficacy of first-line treatment with NAs, including ETV, TDF, and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF), to prevent HCC in CHB patients remains unknown. Several studies have produced controversial results regarding the effects of NAs on the risk and prevention of HCC. In the present review, we discuss these 3 issues, citing recent studies and clinical management guidelines from major international associations. KEY MESSAGES: Suggested approaches for reaching a consensus including applying the propensity score matching method, performing randomized controlled studies, and performing clinical studies with larger numbers of subjects and longer follow-up. S. Karger AG 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9801176/ /pubmed/36589728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525518 Text en Copyright © 2022 by The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kim, Soo Ki
Fujii, Takako
Kim, Soo Ryang
Nakai, Atsushi
Lim, Young-Suk
Hagiwara, Satoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title_full Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title_fullStr Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title_full_unstemmed Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title_short Hepatitis B Virus Treatment and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Controversies and Approaches to Consensus
title_sort hepatitis b virus treatment and hepatocellular carcinoma: controversies and approaches to consensus
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36589728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000525518
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsooki hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT fujiitakako hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT kimsooryang hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT nakaiatsushi hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT limyoungsuk hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT hagiwarasatoru hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus
AT kudomasatoshi hepatitisbvirustreatmentandhepatocellularcarcinomacontroversiesandapproachestoconsensus