Cargando…

Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. METHODS: Hospital admissions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alwatari, Yahya, Khoraki, Jad, Wolfe, Luke G., Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya, Wall, Natalie, Liu, Christopher, Julliard, Walker, Puig, Carlos A., Shah, Rachit D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014
_version_ 1784861470276714496
author Alwatari, Yahya
Khoraki, Jad
Wolfe, Luke G.
Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya
Wall, Natalie
Liu, Christopher
Julliard, Walker
Puig, Carlos A.
Shah, Rachit D.
author_facet Alwatari, Yahya
Khoraki, Jad
Wolfe, Luke G.
Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya
Wall, Natalie
Liu, Christopher
Julliard, Walker
Puig, Carlos A.
Shah, Rachit D.
author_sort Alwatari, Yahya
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. METHODS: Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P <.01). Multivariate analyses showed comparable RATS and VATS complications with no independent association between the minimally invasive surgery approach used and adverse surgical outcomes, except for a decreased risk of pneumonia with RATS, relative to VATS sublobar resection (P <.01). Thoracic complication rates and LOS decreased after RATS lobectomy in 2018, compared with previous years (P <.005). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of robotic-assisted lung resection for cancer has increased in the United States between 2015 and 2018 for sublobar resection and lobectomy. In adjusted regression analysis, compared with VATS, patients who underwent RATS had similar complication rates and LOS. The robotic approach was associated with increased total hospital cost. LOS and thoracic complication rates trended down after RATS lobectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9801282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98012822022-12-31 Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States Alwatari, Yahya Khoraki, Jad Wolfe, Luke G. Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya Wall, Natalie Liu, Christopher Julliard, Walker Puig, Carlos A. Shah, Rachit D. JTCVS Open Thoracic: Lung Cancer OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate utilization and perioperative outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for lung cancer in the United States using a nationally representative database. METHODS: Hospital admissions for lobectomy or sublobar resection (segmentectomy or wedge resection) using VATS or RATS in patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer from October 2015 through December 2018 in the National Inpatient Sample were studied. Patient and hospital characteristics, perioperative complications and mortality, length of stay (LOS), and total hospital cost were compared. Logistic regression was used to assess whether the surgical approach was independently associated with adverse outcomes. RESULTS: There were 83,105 patients who had VATS (n = 65,375) or RATS (n = 17,710) for lobectomy (72.7% VATS) or sublobar resection (84.2% VATS). Utilization of RATS for lobectomy and sublobar resection increased from 19.2% to 34% and 7.3% to 22%, respectively. Mortality, LOS, and conversion rates were comparable. The cost was higher for RATS (P <.01). Multivariate analyses showed comparable RATS and VATS complications with no independent association between the minimally invasive surgery approach used and adverse surgical outcomes, except for a decreased risk of pneumonia with RATS, relative to VATS sublobar resection (P <.01). Thoracic complication rates and LOS decreased after RATS lobectomy in 2018, compared with previous years (P <.005). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of robotic-assisted lung resection for cancer has increased in the United States between 2015 and 2018 for sublobar resection and lobectomy. In adjusted regression analysis, compared with VATS, patients who underwent RATS had similar complication rates and LOS. The robotic approach was associated with increased total hospital cost. LOS and thoracic complication rates trended down after RATS lobectomy. Elsevier 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9801282/ /pubmed/36590738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Thoracic: Lung Cancer
Alwatari, Yahya
Khoraki, Jad
Wolfe, Luke G.
Ramamoorthy, Bhavishya
Wall, Natalie
Liu, Christopher
Julliard, Walker
Puig, Carlos A.
Shah, Rachit D.
Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title_full Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title_fullStr Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title_short Trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the United States
title_sort trends of utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in patients with lung cancer undergoing minimally invasive resection in the united states
topic Thoracic: Lung Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36590738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2022.07.014
work_keys_str_mv AT alwatariyahya trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT khorakijad trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT wolfelukeg trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT ramamoorthybhavishya trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT wallnatalie trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT liuchristopher trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT julliardwalker trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT puigcarlosa trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates
AT shahrachitd trendsofutilizationandperioperativeoutcomesofroboticandvideoassistedthoracoscopicsurgeryinpatientswithlungcancerundergoingminimallyinvasiveresectionintheunitedstates