Cargando…

Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?

INTRODUCTION: Previous articles reported on the tip–apex distance, lag screw placement, fracture pattern, reduction quality, osteoporosis and other factors associated with second surgery. The current study focused on investigating the association of the matching degree between proximal femoral intra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fei, Zou, Ji-Long, Shang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03476-9
_version_ 1784861524930592768
author Wang, Fei
Zou, Ji-Long
Shang, Jian
author_facet Wang, Fei
Zou, Ji-Long
Shang, Jian
author_sort Wang, Fei
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Previous articles reported on the tip–apex distance, lag screw placement, fracture pattern, reduction quality, osteoporosis and other factors associated with second surgery. The current study focused on investigating the association of the matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity on reoperation rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. It included patients with intertrochanteric fracture who were treated with proximal femoral anti-rotatory intramedullary nail (PFNA) between January 2016 and April 2021. The gap between the intramedullary nail and the femoral medullary cavity was equal to the difference in diameter between the two. According to the gap size, all patients were divided into three groups, as follows: high-matching group: gap ≤ 2 mm; middle-matching group: 2 < gap < 4 mm; and low-matching group: gap ≥ 4 mm. The mean gap was measured through standard images. The primary observational index was whether the reoperation was needed, and secondary observational indexes included operative time, length of hospital stay. Patient characteristics were recorded, as follows: age, sex, follow-up time, fracture pattern, reduction grade and length of intramedullary nail. RESULTS: A total of 203 eligible patients were recorded, including 78 males (38.4%) and 125 females (61.6%). They had a mean age of 77.8 ± 9.9 years old and an average follow-up time of 58.1 ± 24.0 weeks. Twenty-seven patients (13.3%) needed a second operation. Coxa varus combined with screw cutting was the most common reason for reoperation (11 cases). Unstable fracture pattern with poor reduction grade tended to contribute to reoperation, whose odds ratio (OR) was 6.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98–22.09; P = 0.002). The three groups had 11 cases (13.7%), 12 cases (13.8%) and 4 cases (11.1%) of reoperation, respectively, and logistic regression showed no significant association was noted between matching degree of intramedullary nail and reoperation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity did not seem to be an important factor for reoperation, which offered more options of intramedullary nail size intraoperatively and reduced implants stock from inventory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9801600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98016002022-12-31 Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures? Wang, Fei Zou, Ji-Long Shang, Jian J Orthop Surg Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Previous articles reported on the tip–apex distance, lag screw placement, fracture pattern, reduction quality, osteoporosis and other factors associated with second surgery. The current study focused on investigating the association of the matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity on reoperation rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. It included patients with intertrochanteric fracture who were treated with proximal femoral anti-rotatory intramedullary nail (PFNA) between January 2016 and April 2021. The gap between the intramedullary nail and the femoral medullary cavity was equal to the difference in diameter between the two. According to the gap size, all patients were divided into three groups, as follows: high-matching group: gap ≤ 2 mm; middle-matching group: 2 < gap < 4 mm; and low-matching group: gap ≥ 4 mm. The mean gap was measured through standard images. The primary observational index was whether the reoperation was needed, and secondary observational indexes included operative time, length of hospital stay. Patient characteristics were recorded, as follows: age, sex, follow-up time, fracture pattern, reduction grade and length of intramedullary nail. RESULTS: A total of 203 eligible patients were recorded, including 78 males (38.4%) and 125 females (61.6%). They had a mean age of 77.8 ± 9.9 years old and an average follow-up time of 58.1 ± 24.0 weeks. Twenty-seven patients (13.3%) needed a second operation. Coxa varus combined with screw cutting was the most common reason for reoperation (11 cases). Unstable fracture pattern with poor reduction grade tended to contribute to reoperation, whose odds ratio (OR) was 6.61 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.98–22.09; P = 0.002). The three groups had 11 cases (13.7%), 12 cases (13.8%) and 4 cases (11.1%) of reoperation, respectively, and logistic regression showed no significant association was noted between matching degree of intramedullary nail and reoperation rate. CONCLUSIONS: The matching degree between proximal femoral intramedullary nail and femoral medullary cavity did not seem to be an important factor for reoperation, which offered more options of intramedullary nail size intraoperatively and reduced implants stock from inventory. BioMed Central 2022-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9801600/ /pubmed/36581940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03476-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Fei
Zou, Ji-Long
Shang, Jian
Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title_full Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title_fullStr Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title_full_unstemmed Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title_short Does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
title_sort does matching degree matter for proximal femoral intramedullary nail on reoperation rate in intertrochanteric fractures?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9801600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36581940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-022-03476-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfei doesmatchingdegreematterforproximalfemoralintramedullarynailonreoperationrateinintertrochantericfractures
AT zoujilong doesmatchingdegreematterforproximalfemoralintramedullarynailonreoperationrateinintertrochantericfractures
AT shangjian doesmatchingdegreematterforproximalfemoralintramedullarynailonreoperationrateinintertrochantericfractures