Cargando…

The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics

The costs associated with biologic therapy in immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease has steadily increased since their introduction over 2 decades ago. The introduction of biosimilars has the promise of cost savings and putting reimbursement pressure on future market entries...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Panaccione, Remo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab038
_version_ 1784861633288339456
author Panaccione, Remo
author_facet Panaccione, Remo
author_sort Panaccione, Remo
collection PubMed
description The costs associated with biologic therapy in immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease has steadily increased since their introduction over 2 decades ago. The introduction of biosimilars has the promise of cost savings and putting reimbursement pressure on future market entries. However, the interpretation of evidence to support the use of biosimilars either as first line or as part of a nonmedical switch strategy is not straight forward due to low to very low-quality evidence. In particular, switching to a biosimilar is associated with both clinical, ethical, and possibly medicolegal issues. Due to these factors, solutions to address cost efficiency should involve an open, transparent, and collaborative dialogue among the various stakeholders and if at all possible involve strategies that allow patients to remain on originator biologics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9802193
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-98021932023-02-10 The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics Panaccione, Remo Crohns Colitis 360 Invited Review The costs associated with biologic therapy in immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease has steadily increased since their introduction over 2 decades ago. The introduction of biosimilars has the promise of cost savings and putting reimbursement pressure on future market entries. However, the interpretation of evidence to support the use of biosimilars either as first line or as part of a nonmedical switch strategy is not straight forward due to low to very low-quality evidence. In particular, switching to a biosimilar is associated with both clinical, ethical, and possibly medicolegal issues. Due to these factors, solutions to address cost efficiency should involve an open, transparent, and collaborative dialogue among the various stakeholders and if at all possible involve strategies that allow patients to remain on originator biologics. Oxford University Press 2021-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9802193/ /pubmed/36776671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab038 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Invited Review
Panaccione, Remo
The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title_full The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title_fullStr The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title_full_unstemmed The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title_short The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
title_sort great debate with ibd biosimilars: con: biosimilars should not be routinely used as a first line biologic and not switched from reference biologics
topic Invited Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802193/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab038
work_keys_str_mv AT panaccioneremo thegreatdebatewithibdbiosimilarsconbiosimilarsshouldnotberoutinelyusedasafirstlinebiologicandnotswitchedfromreferencebiologics
AT panaccioneremo greatdebatewithibdbiosimilarsconbiosimilarsshouldnotberoutinelyusedasafirstlinebiologicandnotswitchedfromreferencebiologics