Cargando…
The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Con: Biosimilars Should Not Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and Not Switched From Reference Biologics
The costs associated with biologic therapy in immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease has steadily increased since their introduction over 2 decades ago. The introduction of biosimilars has the promise of cost savings and putting reimbursement pressure on future market entries...
Autor principal: | Panaccione, Remo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9802193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36776671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otab038 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Great Debate With IBD Biosimilars: Pro: Biosimilars Should Be Routinely Used as a First Line Biologic and May Be Switched From Reference Biologics
por: Limdi, Jimmy K, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies
por: Cohen, Hillel P., et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Biosimilar infliximab use in paediatric IBD
por: Richmond, Lisa, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The Clinical Implications of Nocebo Effects for Biosimilar Therapy
por: Colloca, Luana, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
The Law and Ethics of Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar in Canada
por: Murdoch, Blake, et al.
Publicado: (2020)